Synth-DIY Yahoo! Groups Archives

Re: [Digital BW] True resolution of Epson 2450

2003-03-14 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service

J Vee wrote:

>I note that someone said that the scan results from the 3200 were exactly
>the same as the 2450.  Using Silverfast for the 2450 and the option (Mac)
>key one can check the actual "hardware resolution".  It shows a maximum
>hardware resolution of 3200 on my machine.  Does this mean that, indeed,
>they are really the same machine?
>
>  
>
Perhaps not EXACTLY the same..

The firmware may be different..

But I'd bet they use the same engine..

Didn't you notice how quickly EPSON pulled the 2450 from the lineup 
after it became apparent it was under priced in comparison to its 
Expression series..  I do know I heard some pros bitch about 
unjustifiably having paid so much more for an Expression
Keith

"Just some guy," and caretaker of the Multiverse's largest EPSON printer 
User Community (highly recommended by Vogon Poets and MegaDodo 
Publications), at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EPSONx7x_Printers/

"For the rest of you out there, the secret is to bang the rocks together 
guys"

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] True resolution of Epson 2450

2003-03-14 by Martin Wesley

----- Original Message -----

Show quoted textHide quoted text

From: "J Vee" <j.vee@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:17 AM
Subject: [Digital BW] True resolution of Epson 2450

> I note that someone said that the scan results from the 3200 were exactly
> the same as the 2450.  Using Silverfast for the 2450 and the option (Mac)
> key one can check the actual "hardware resolution".  It shows a maximum
> hardware resolution of 3200 on my machine.  Does this mean that, indeed,
> they are really the same machine?
>

J,

I am sure that is the correct "hardware resolution" but that is not the same
as real usable optical resolution. Optical resolution can be determined by
scanning a resolution target and observing how many lines per inch, lpi, can
be clearly seen in the scan. From this you can calculate the optical
resolution which is all that matters for our purposes.

Since the optical resolution is a combination of the "hardware resolution",
optical path of the scanner and the electronics it will be something less
than the "hardware resolution".  However, I would hope that the results of
the 3200 would be better than the 2450, but I would not be surprised if the
improvement is less than the increase in "hardware resolution" suggests.

Since there is so much interest in these scanners, I hope someone with a
resolution target and access to the scanners will check the two out
sometime.

Martin Wesley

Digital BW, The Print

Re: [Digital BW] True resolution of Epson 2450

Re: [Digital BW] True resolution of Epson 2450

Re: [Digital BW] True resolution of Epson 2450

Move to quarantaine