Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: [Digital BW] Re: the definition of a Giclee print.

Re: [Digital BW] Re: the definition of a Giclee print.

2003-08-03 by Julian Thomas

> Since it's a French word, why not call them "Freedom Prints? (sorry,
> had to do that.)
>
why did you have to do that? as inkjet is an american word maybe we should
call them human rights abuse and invasion prints? does my comment make you
realise how innapropriate your comment was to the billions of people not
living in the US?

Julian

[Digital BW] Re: the definition of a Giclee print.

2003-08-03 by markroth61

I was being facitious.


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Julian Thomas" 
<julianthomas@t...> wrote:
> > Since it's a French word, why not call them "Freedom Prints? 
(sorry,
> > had to do that.)
> >
> why did you have to do that? as inkjet is an american word maybe we 
should
> call them human rights abuse and invasion prints? does my comment 
make you
> realise how innapropriate your comment was to the billions of 
people not
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> living in the US?
> 
> Julian

Re: [Digital BW] Re: the definition of a Giclee print.

2003-08-03 by Bill Morse

Well done Julian!

Bill, ROTFL!

on 8/3/03 11:42 AM, Julian Thomas wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>> Since it's a French word, why not call them "Freedom Prints? (sorry,
>> had to do that.)
>> 
> why did you have to do that? as inkjet is an american word maybe we should
> call them human rights abuse and invasion prints? does my comment make you
> realise how innapropriate your comment was to the billions of people not
> living in the US?
> 
> Julian
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other
> resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
> page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
> them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
> resources on the homepage.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> 
>

Re: [Digital BW] Re: the definition of a Giclee print.

2003-08-03 by Anthony Atkielski

Julian writes:

> why did you have to do that? as inkjet is an american word
> maybe we should call them human rights abuse and invasion
> prints? does my comment make you realise how innapropriate
> your comment was to the billions of people not living
> in the US?

A cool soda pop by the beach might make you feel better, although I'm not
sure how much of an effect it has on testosterone levels.

Re: [Digital BW] Re: the definition of a Giclee print.

2003-08-03 by Steven Schaefer

Thanks I am definitely open to suggestions. I have heard them called
Carbon-Based Pigment Print, also.

Steve

markroth61 wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> If we print with archival inks on archival paper, then why not call
> them "archival prints". If they're handcolored, then
> they're "handcolored archival prints". I've done custom framing for
> artists who took their oil paintings down to Kinkos, ran off color
> copies, then called them "Giclee prints" in their literature and on
> their print racks. Giclee has become a pretentious, meaningless term.
> Since it's a French word, why not call them "Freedom Prints? (sorry,
> had to do that.)
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steven Schaefer
> <stevenr@m...> wrote:
> > What is the definition of a Giclee print.
> >
> >
> > I am participating in my first art show next Saturday and am trying
> to
> > determine what to say about the prints.
> >
> > If you live in Atlanta come on by and see me. It will be in Grant
> Park
> > Saturday August 9th. My space will be #18.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Steve Schaefer
> 
>                    Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>                        ADVERTISEMENT
>                         [click here]
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls
> and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish
> to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting
> this same page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to
> keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject
> header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the
> various resources on the homepage.
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Coating dye inks on matt paper

2003-08-04 by Ed Mathews

Hi,
     I'm using standard Epson Inks on my 1280.  I bought a can of
Lumijet Imageseal ($20.00!).  It turned my BO print a weird shade of
green and darkened everything to the point of being totally
unacceptable.  But the ugly print was indeed waterproof after that.
     So as another experiment, today I went to a local craft store and
bought a water-based PUR varnish, brushed it on, and all the ink ran and
bled into the white parts of the print.  Although again the ugly print
was waterproofed after that.
     Will using a rod to apply this stuff not affect the inks, or is it
a matter of needing to use a carbon based ink to begin with?  What am I
missing here?

Thanks,
Ed
http://lightandsilver.com

Re: [Digital BW] Coating dye inks on matt paper

2003-08-04 by Robert Morrison

Get rid of the dyes, they aren't water fast and will only lead to  
agrivation with the coatings.  You could try spraying with Krylon  
UV-resistant spray first to seal them, then use a PUR to seal from  
water...but why go to all that trouble with dyes...they are only  
temporary anyway.  A rod won't make any difference, your problem is  
that the dyes aren't water-fast to begin with. You would be much better  
off using a 2200 with the Ultrachromes...if you are trying to get water  
fastness.

Robert
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Sunday, August 3, 2003, at 06:09  PM, Ed Mathews wrote:

> Hi,
>      I'm using standard Epson Inks on my 1280.  I bought a can of
> Lumijet Imageseal ($20.00!).  It turned my BO print a weird shade of
> green and darkened everything to the point of being totally
> unacceptable.  But the ugly print was indeed waterproof after that.
>      So as another experiment, today I went to a local craft store and
> bought a water-based PUR varnish, brushed it on, and all the ink ran  
> and
> bled into the white parts of the print.  Although again the ugly print
> was waterproofed after that.
>      Will using a rod to apply this stuff not affect the inks, or is it
> a matter of needing to use a carbon based ink to begin with?  What am I
> missing here?
>
> Thanks,
> Ed
> http://lightandsilver.com
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor  
> ---------------------~-->
> Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for Your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
> Printer at Myinks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US &  
> Canada. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/sO0ANB/LIdGAA/ySSFAA/ucIolB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ~->
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls  
> and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish  
> to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting  
> this same page.
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to  
> keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject  
> header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the  
> various resources on the homepage.
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to  
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

RE: [Digital BW] Coating dye inks on matt paper

2003-08-04 by Ed Mathews

Thanks for the info.  Unfortunately, I just got a decent 1280 (third one
under warranty - this one appears to work OK), and another new printer
is not in my plans at this time.  So should I use the MIS aftermarket
carbon inks?  Will that accept the coatings without ruining the print?

Thanks,
Ed Mathews X3025.
Douron, Inc. 410-363-2600.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Morrison [mailto:rmorrison@...] 
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 12:04 PM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Coating dye inks on matt paper
> 
> 
> Get rid of the dyes, they aren't water fast and will only lead to  
> agrivation with the coatings.  You could try spraying with Krylon  
> UV-resistant spray first to seal them, then use a PUR to seal from  
> water...but why go to all that trouble with dyes...they are only  
> temporary anyway.  A rod won't make any difference, your problem is  
> that the dyes aren't water-fast to begin with. You would be 
> much better  
> off using a 2200 with the Ultrachromes...if you are trying to 
> get water  
> fastness.
> 
> Robert
> 
> 
> On Sunday, August 3, 2003, at 06:09  PM, Ed Mathews wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >      I'm using standard Epson Inks on my 1280.  I bought a can of
> > Lumijet Imageseal ($20.00!).  It turned my BO print a weird shade of
> > green and darkened everything to the point of being totally
> > unacceptable.  But the ugly print was indeed waterproof after that.
> >      So as another experiment, today I went to a local 
> craft store and
> > bought a water-based PUR varnish, brushed it on, and all 
> the ink ran  
> > and
> > bled into the white parts of the print.  Although again the 
> ugly print
> > was waterproofed after that.
> >      Will using a rod to apply this stuff not affect the 
> inks, or is it
> > a matter of needing to use a carbon based ink to begin 
> with?  What am I
> > missing here?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ed
> > http://lightandsilver.com

Re: [Digital BW] Coating dye inks on matt paper

2003-08-04 by Robert Morrison

You could try them...I know that the old MIS Perpetuals were ok with  
coatings.  I was never able to get profiles that I was happy with for  
any of the 3rd party color inks...but this would solve your water  
resistance problem.  May want to ask this question on the archival  
color list.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/archivalcolor

Robert
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Monday, August 4, 2003, at 09:22  AM, Ed Mathews wrote:

> Thanks for the info.  Unfortunately, I just got a decent 1280 (third  
> one
> under warranty - this one appears to work OK), and another new printer
> is not in my plans at this time.  So should I use the MIS aftermarket
> carbon inks?  Will that accept the coatings without ruining the print?
>
> Thanks,
> Ed Mathews X3025.
> Douron, Inc. 410-363-2600.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Robert Morrison [mailto:rmorrison@...]
>> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 12:04 PM
>> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Coating dye inks on matt paper
>>
>>
>> Get rid of the dyes, they aren't water fast and will only lead to
>> agrivation with the coatings.  You could try spraying with Krylon
>> UV-resistant spray first to seal them, then use a PUR to seal from
>> water...but why go to all that trouble with dyes...they are only
>> temporary anyway.  A rod won't make any difference, your problem is
>> that the dyes aren't water-fast to begin with. You would be
>> much better
>> off using a 2200 with the Ultrachromes...if you are trying to
>> get water
>> fastness.
>>
>> Robert
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, August 3, 2003, at 06:09  PM, Ed Mathews wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>      I'm using standard Epson Inks on my 1280.  I bought a can of
>>> Lumijet Imageseal ($20.00!).  It turned my BO print a weird shade of
>>> green and darkened everything to the point of being totally
>>> unacceptable.  But the ugly print was indeed waterproof after that.
>>>      So as another experiment, today I went to a local
>> craft store and
>>> bought a water-based PUR varnish, brushed it on, and all
>> the ink ran
>>> and
>>> bled into the white parts of the print.  Although again the
>> ugly print
>>> was waterproofed after that.
>>>      Will using a rod to apply this stuff not affect the
>> inks, or is it
>>> a matter of needing to use a carbon based ink to begin
>> with?  What am I
>>> missing here?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ed
>>> http://lightandsilver.com
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor  
> ---------------------~-->
> Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for Your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
> Printer at Myinks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US &  
> Canada. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/sO0ANB/LIdGAA/ySSFAA/ucIolB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ~->
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls  
> and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish  
> to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting  
> this same page.
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to  
> keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject  
> header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the  
> various resources on the homepage.
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to  
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

Re: [Digital BW] Coating dye inks on matt paper

2003-08-04 by Ron Norman

> > 
> > On Sunday, August 3, 2003, at 06:09  PM, Ed Mathews wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > >      I'm using standard Epson Inks on my 1280.  I bought a 
can of
> > > Lumijet Imageseal ($20.00!).  It turned my BO print a weird 
shade of
> > > green and darkened everything to the point of being totally
> > > unacceptable.  But the ugly print was indeed waterproof 
after that.
> > >      So as another experiment, today I went to a local 
> > craft store and
> > > bought a water-based PUR varnish, brushed it on, and all 
> > the ink ran  
> > > and
> > > bled into the white parts of the print.  Although again the 
> > ugly print
> > > was waterproofed after that.
> > >      Will using a rod to apply this stuff not affect the 
> > inks, or is it
> > > a matter of needing to use a carbon based ink to begin 
> > with?  What am I
> > > missing here?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ed
> > > http://lightandsilver.com

I use Krylon "Crystal Clear" #1303 and give it 3 light coats and 
never have any problems.   I use the MIS dye based inks and MIS 
quad black archival.

Re: [Digital BW] Coating dye inks on matt paper

2003-08-04 by Robert Morrison

On Monday, August 4, 2003, at 09:52  AM, Ron Norman wrote:

> I use Krylon "Crystal Clear" #1303 and give it 3 light coats and
> never have any problems.   I use the MIS dye based inks and MIS
> quad black archival.
>
Never had problems with what?

Robert

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.