Re: [Digital BW] Re: More Easy B&W Questions
2003-12-04 by Bob Frost
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC
Thread
2003-12-04 by Bob Frost
Why not refill with Ultrachromes from 7600 carts; about 1/4 of the price per ml or ounce, as compared with the 2200 carts. Bob Frost. ----- Original Message ----- From: "flyfishingusa2002" <tflyfish@...> The only problem that I have with the 2200 is the costs of inks. I'm about to try refilling myself with the MIS compatible product.
2003-12-04 by flyfishingusa2002
Bob, Simple, Epson, along with all the printer companies rip all of us off with their consumable prices. I would rather give the money to a company like MIS who have helped to make DigitalBlackand WhiteThePrint much easier to achieve. If they have a compatible product, as they usually do, then I will purchase from them. Sierra Gold --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Frost" <bobfrost@b...> wrote: > Why not refill with Ultrachromes from 7600 carts; about 1/4 of the price per
> ml or ounce, as compared with the 2200 carts. > > Bob Frost. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "flyfishingusa2002" <tflyfish@c...> > > The only problem that I have with the > 2200 is the costs of inks. I'm about to try refilling myself with > the MIS compatible product.
2003-12-04 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
flyfishingusa2002 wrote: >Bob, >Simple, Epson, along with all the printer companies rip all of us >off with their consumable prices. > Sierra, I've, in the past been, one of the most vocal critics of the cost-shifting to consumables (particularly inks). However, I think I need to bring something I'm hearing through the grapevine on this note to the attention of list members. More than one source in the industry (none of them from EPSON btw) has told me that EPSON has apparently decided to alter its pricing model a bit.. Apparently, given the European Union law on recyclable/reusable cartridges and pressure on other quarters, as well as the maturing and change in the market itself, they are moving from a model in which inks were the prime cost recouping/profit item to one where papers and consumable media are... IF this IS true, I have no problem with EPSON building profiles into their software for all the new media they introduce (which would keep most consumers from using much other media) - that bar to changing media is not that high, but should be more than enough for the average consumer to choose to use EPSON branded media, while at the same time, they aren't imprisoned by high inks prices.. Of course, this is potentially a double edged sword for those of us here. The profitability of alternative inks has been a driving force in the development of and sustainability of 3rd party inks (especially the innovative B&W quadsets etc.). Yet, I think the market is now mature enough and broad enough that those consumers/prosumers like us in these niche markets will still be willing to pay a premium for the niche products even if the cost of OEM inks drops... With more people entering these niches all the time, and the continuing expansion of inkjets into every home, I think that both parts of the biz can remain quite profitable: EPSON, and others, as OEM manufacturers and the 3rd party people serving specific target markets.. Thoughts? One last comment, IF the rumored changes are true EPSON deserves kudos for taking a more environmentally friendly tack (making recycling/reuse more viable), and for leading the OEMs in that direction... As an aside, Sierra, I think "rip all of us off" is a bit too strong a way to characterize the cost-shifting to inks - it may be anti-competitive or a less than popular business model, but "ripping us off" implies outright theft and I really don't think that's a fair way to categorize it - this isn't anywhere near the level of after hours mutual funds trades or cooking the books - it's simply, to me, a business model I abhorred and couldn't support.. Not to mention that, in the case of those of us on the list we often have the best of both worlds, cheap initial printer costs and the availability of low-cost and/or specialty inks from other manufacturers (who see profit in those products)... Keith Krebs "Just some guy," and caretaker of the Multiverse's largest EPSON printer User Community (highly recommended by Vogon Poets and MegaDodo Publications), at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EPSON_Printers/ "For the rest of you out there, the secret is to bang the rocks together guys" [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2003-12-04 by Bob Frost
Fair enough; that's your opinion. I tried MIS VM with my 1270 and 1290 and got the first lot of clogs I've ever experienced. I'm not paying to spend my time and money going thro' endless cleaning cycles, and putting even more ink down the drain. Epson have sorted that out, so they get my money. bob Frost.
----- Original Message ----- From: "flyfishingusa2002" <tflyfish@...> Bob, Simple, Epson, along with all the printer companies rip all of us off with their consumable prices. I would rather give the money to a company like MIS who have helped to make DigitalBlackand WhiteThePrint much easier to achieve. If they have a compatible product, as they usually do, then I will purchase from them.
2003-12-04 by flyfishingusa2002
I had the same problem with a 1200 and a 1270, but the 2200 is different in that is uses pigment inks rather than dye based. As a matter of fact both my 1200 and 1270 clogged on a regular basis even using the Epson inks. Great color gamut, but the cloggs made it more than they were worth. Since i purchased a 2200 I have never looked back. I also run a 3000 with MIS inks and dispite letting it sit powered off for weeks sometimes, it never takes more than one cleaning cycle to get it firing on all jets...I assume that you have also first hand experiance with the 2200 and MIS inks? If you have and have had problems with cloggs on the 2200 then I shall steer clear of them and follow you advice and purchase 7600 to refill from. Sierra Gold --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Frost" <bobfrost@b...> wrote: > Fair enough; that's your opinion. I tried MIS VM with my 1270 and 1290 and > got the first lot of clogs I've ever experienced. I'm not paying to spend my > time and money going thro' endless cleaning cycles, and putting even more > ink down the drain. Epson have sorted that out, so they get my money. > > bob Frost. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "flyfishingusa2002" <tflyfish@c...> > > > Bob, > Simple, Epson, along with all the printer companies rip all of us > off with their consumable prices. I would rather give the money to a
> company like MIS who have helped to make DigitalBlackand > WhiteThePrint much easier to achieve. If they have a compatible > product, as they usually do, then I will purchase from them.
2003-12-04 by Glenn Mitchell
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "flyfishingusa2002" <tflyfish@c...> wrote: > I had the same problem with a 1200 and a 1270, but the 2200 is > different in that is uses pigment inks rather than dye based. As a > matter of fact both my 1200 and 1270 clogged on a regular basis even > using the Epson inks. All I ever used was Epson inks and my 1280 clogged every couple of weeks. Great prints, but a PIA when it came to clogs. My 2200 has never yet clogged with Epson inks. Not even with switching back and forth with Matte Black and Photographic Black inks. Whichever is not in use is stored in a Ziploc-type plastic bag. Cheers, Mitch
2003-12-04 by Tom Baker
Me too. I'll grant that the Ultrachrome inks are somewhat on the expensive side. However, I've been printing on my 9600 for a year now, and never had a bad nozzle check or clog. I like that. The ink prices may be high, but certainly not a rip off. Tom Baker Bob Frost <bobfrost@...> wrote: Fair enough; that's your opinion. I tried MIS VM with my 1270 and 1290 and got the first lot of clogs I've ever experienced. I'm not paying to spend my time and money going thro' endless cleaning cycles, and putting even more ink down the drain. Epson have sorted that out, so they get my money. bob Frost.
----- Original Message ----- From: "flyfishingusa2002" <tflyfish@...> Bob, Simple, Epson, along with all the printer companies rip all of us off with their consumable prices. I would rather give the money to a company like MIS who have helped to make DigitalBlackand WhiteThePrint much easier to achieve. If they have a compatible product, as they usually do, then I will purchase from them. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See �Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines� in the Files section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE �OWNER� AND �MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE �OWNER� AND �MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]