Digital BW, The Print

I often create sheets of many small images (6 5x5's on a 11x17 sheet) but I need a 
good idiot proof paper cutter so I can get good even cuts.  I've been using a ruler and 
xacto knife but I can't say that the results have been great.  All the local places don't 
have a good selection of paper cutters and I'm not sure what to look for.

Should I get a guillotine type or another type (the kind with the blade that you move 
back and forth... not sure what they are called though)

Any recommendations on quality brands and things to look for would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Jeff

Peel off the label and tighten the screws.  Replace label.  

Helene
I just bought a 15" Rotatrim from B&H and am having problems with 
some of my photos "slipping" under the stopping metal ruler (what you 
push the paper up against, to square it up).  It slips under at the 
end closest to the cutting edge, right by the "0" on the cutting 
board.  Is this happening with anyone else?  It's really annoying as 
after cutting, I realize part of the photo slipped under and turned 
the photo, making my cut crooked!  Plus this thing wasn't cheap..


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Beautiful!! That worked perfectly! Thank you so much. I didn't even 
know those screws were there.. I was about to march down to B&H and 
raise some hell.

Thanks again,
  -daniel perez

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, grdglass@a... 
wrote:
> Peel off the label and tighten the screws.  Replace label.  
> 
> Helene


> I just bought a 15" Rotatrim from B&H and am having problems with 
> some of my photos "slipping" under the stopping metal ruler (what 
you 
> push the paper up against, to square it up).  It slips under at the 
> end closest to the cutting edge, right by the "0" on the cutting 
> board.  Is this happening with anyone else?  It's really annoying 
as 

> after cutting, I realize part of the photo slipped under and turned 
> the photo, making my cut crooked!  Plus this thing wasn't cheap..
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]