Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-10 by Jean-Marc Humbert

Could we expect in a next future that the Epson R800 (or a printer of 
the same family with larger outputs) could replace the Epson 
2200/2100 for B&W prints (associated to dedicated RIP like 
ImagePrint)?

I understand that the new Epson R800 is fully able to print on gloss 
papers but that unlike the Epson 2200/2100 there is no gray 
cartbridge.

JM Humbert
Paris, France

RE: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-10 by Paul D. DeRocco

> From: Jean-Marc Humbert [mailto:humbertjm@...]
>
> Could we expect in a next future that the Epson R800 (or a printer of
> the same family with larger outputs) could replace the Epson
> 2200/2100 for B&W prints (associated to dedicated RIP like
> ImagePrint)?
>
> I understand that the new Epson R800 is fully able to print on gloss
> papers but that unlike the Epson 2200/2100 there is no gray
> cartbridge.

With a 1.5pl drop size, there's probably little need for light black, or
light anything. And that avoids problems calibrating the transitions between
the light and dark inks.

Of course, if you drive it with a RIP, you can in theory put any colors you
want in any position, including C, M, Y, four shades of black, and the
overcoating. I expect someone will do exactly that in time.

I'm a little surprised that Epson hasn't generalized their ink assignments,
allowing a choice of different combinations of colors to be put into the
head positions. The only place they do something like this is in the 4000,
where you can put in dual CMYK for printing graphics at double speed, which
for me is a snoozer.

--

Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
Paul                mailto:pderocco@...

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-10 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service

I'd say that's a big MAYBE.

The new UC HG inks reportedly still have metamerism issues comparable to 
those of the 2100/2200..

I'd bet on a new 13x19 format printer with a new set of inks next year...




 
Keith Krebs

"Just some guy," caretaker of the Multiverse's largest EPSON printer 
User Community (highly recommended by Vogon Poets and MegaDodo 
Publications), at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EPSON_Printers/
and  the Multiverse's largest Canon printer User  Community at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Canon-printers
"For the rest of you out there, the secret is to bang the rocks together 
guys"

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-16 by Martin Sluka

At 12:41 -0500 10.2.2004, Editor P.O.V. Image Service wrote:
*******************************************

>I'd say that's a big MAYBE.
>
>The new UC HG inks reportedly still have metamerism issues comparable to
>those of the 2100/2200..

I have seen the R800 of PaperWorld in Frankfurt (Germany) two weeks ago.

They printed from the same color file Epson's sample picture (the 
owl) the color and BW print outs simply by check the Grayscale in 
driver setup.

There was horrible light conditions - from small pinkish halogens to 
daylight. My BW sample from 2100 printed by IP5.6 - deadly neutral 
under normal light - was pink in light areas there.

The BW printouts from R800 were 99,5 % without ANY metamerism. 
Printed from colors too, as I checked by loupe.

The color check print on Hahnemuehle PhotoRag - the standard Fuji RGB 
test - was amazing - neutral grey wedges, very bright blues without 
any purple posterisation, very bright reds with many details in 
saturated areas too.

Interesting was compare light areas of BW printouts from 9600 (IP5.6) 
and R800 (Epson driver). Both printed from color inks too, but the 
size of drops for R800 is much more smaller than one expected and 
with much more regular shape and distribution.

Martin
--

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-16 by Ernst Dinkla

----- Original Message ----- 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "Martin Sluka" <martinsluka@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 9:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the
2200/2100 for B&W?


At 12:41 -0500 10.2.2004, Editor P.O.V. Image Service wrote:
*******************************************

>I'd say that's a big MAYBE.
>
>The new UC HG inks reportedly still have metamerism issues
comparable to
>those of the 2100/2200..

I have seen the R800 of PaperWorld in Frankfurt (Germany) two
weeks ago.

They printed from the same color file Epson's sample picture (the
owl) the color and BW print outs simply by check the Grayscale in
driver setup.

There was horrible light conditions - from small pinkish halogens
to
daylight. My BW sample from 2100 printed by IP5.6 - deadly
neutral
under normal light - was pink in light areas there.

The BW printouts from R800 were 99,5 % without ANY metamerism.
Printed from colors too, as I checked by loupe.

The color check print on Hahnemuehle PhotoRag - the standard Fuji
RGB
test - was amazing - neutral grey wedges, very bright blues
without
any purple posterisation, very bright reds with many details in
saturated areas too.

Interesting was compare light areas of BW printouts from 9600
(IP5.6)
and R800 (Epson driver). Both printed from color inks too, but
the
size of drops for R800 is much more smaller than one expected and
with much more regular shape and distribution.

Martin
-- 

Martin,

With a droplet size of 1.5 picoliter the black generation can go
very far if not to 0%. Expecting that the black is Ultrachrome
warm there's blue needed to get it neutral. That blue doesn't
have to be Cyan + Magenta on the R800 but just the Blue ink. Any
sign of the dominance of black + blue in that B&W print ?

I still wonder whether it will be easy to make custom profiles
for that printer. An "RGB" printer profile for the Epson driver
will be alright, "CMYK" based RIPs will not get the best possible
from the R800. N-colour RIPs + profile creators are needed for
that task.

Ernst

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-17 by edrudolpho

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Martin Sluka 
<martinsluka@m...> wrote:
> They printed from the same color file Epson's sample picture (the 
> owl) the color and BW print outs simply by check the Grayscale in 
> driver setup.>


Martin, I have just installed the epson software here, in the U>S>, and there is no 
grayscale option.  there is, however, a Black option.  Choosing that, I seem to be 
printing in Color, just as if I'd selected Color.

Ed, in San Francisco

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-17 by Martin Sluka

At 06:59 +0000 17.2.2004, edrudolpho wrote:
*******************************************

>--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Martin Sluka
><martinsluka@m...> wrote:
>>  They printed from the same color file Epson's sample picture (the
>>  owl) the color and BW print outs simply by check the Grayscale in
>>  driver setup.>
>
>
>Martin, I have just installed the epson software here, in the U>S>, 
>and there is no
>grayscale option.  there is, however, a Black option.  Choosing 
>that, I seem to be
>printing in Color, just as if I'd selected Color.
>
>Ed, in San Francisco

I'm sorry, that was prerelease version runnng under WXP. This option 
was somewhere in advanced setups.

Martin
--

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-17 by Steve Kale

Hi

There are a few of us trying to determine whether BO is possible with this
printer.  Are you sure that you seem to be printing in colour?  With the
Epson 2100 printer driver here in the UK the Black Only option is simply
marked as Black.  Can you test for us the following workflow:  a greyscale
image in Grey Gamma 2.2, Same as Source in PS print pane, Black in Epson
driver....

Thanks

Steve
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "edrudolpho" <erudolph@...>
Reply-To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 06:59:17 -0000
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor  of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Martin Sluka
<martinsluka@m...> wrote:
> They printed from the same color file Epson's sample picture (the
> owl) the color and BW print outs simply by check the Grayscale in
> driver setup.>


Martin, I have just installed the epson software here, in the U>S>, and
there is no 
grayscale option.  there is, however, a Black option.  Choosing that, I seem
to be 
printing in Color, just as if I'd selected Color.

Ed, in San Francisco



Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
they are often being updated.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
membership without notice.
- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from
the membership.
- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and
Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines” in the Files section:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/

BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE “OWNER” AND
“MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU
FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY
DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS,
GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  “OWNER” AND
“MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY
TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR
ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY
THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER
MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.




Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
* http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/
*  
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
* DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Uns
ubscribe> 
*  
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-17 by edrudolpho

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale <stevekale@b...> 
wrote:
> Hi
> 
> There are a few of us trying to determine whether BO is possible with this
> printer.  Are you sure that you seem to be printing in colour?  With the
> Epson 2100 printer driver here in the UK the Black Only option is simply
> marked as Black.  Can you test for us the following workflow:  a greyscale
> image in Grey Gamma 2.2, Same as Source in PS print pane, Black in Epson
> driver.... 
> Thanks
> Steve

Hi Steve... I am a newbie to this BO printing but it appears to me that using the above 
workflow, the R800 is printing in color.  

Ed

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-17 by edrudolpho

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "edrudolpho" 
<erudolph@p...> wrote:

> 
> Hi Steve... I am a newbie to this BO printing but it appears to me that using the 
above 
> workflow, the R800 is printing in color.  
> 
> Ed

P.S.   ....I am using a Macintosh with OS X.

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-17 by Steve Kale

Ed, thanks.  What is it that makes you think it is printing in colour?  For
example, if I select Black in the 2100 driver under Print Settings -> Ink
and then go to Colour Management, Colour Control is selected but Colour Sync
and No Colour Adjustment are greyed out.  This is still black ink only
printing.

Steve
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "edrudolpho" <erudolph@...>
Reply-To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:59:58 -0000
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor  of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "edrudolpho"
<erudolph@p...> wrote:

> 
> Hi Steve... I am a newbie to this BO printing but it appears to me that using
the 
above 
> workflow, the R800 is printing in color.
> 
> Ed

P.S.   ....I am using a Macintosh with OS X.



Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
they are often being updated.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
membership without notice.
- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from
the membership.
- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and
Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines” in the Files section:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/

BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE “OWNER” AND
“MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU
FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY
DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS,
GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  “OWNER” AND
“MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY
TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR
ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY
THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER
MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Click Here 
<http://rd.yahoo.com/SIG=12ceqj8gg/M=274551.4550177.5718621.1261774/D=egroup
web/S=1705019182:HM/EXP=1077105604/A=1994230/R=2/*http://ad.doubleclick.net/
jump/N3349.yahoo1/B1282054.22;abr=!ie4;abr=!ie5;sz=300x250;code=18634;dcopt=
rcl;ord=1077019204870237?>


Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
* http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/
*  
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
* DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Uns
ubscribe> 
*  
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-17 by Carl Schofield

Ed,

Could you tell us what paper and driver settings you used?  Also, how 
did you determine that the R800 was printing in color?  Both the photo 
K and matte K inks are quite warm in tone, so a warm brown print tone 
does not necessarily mean that color inks were used.

Carl
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Tuesday, February 17, 2004, at 06:59  AM, edrudolpho wrote:

> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "edrudolpho"
> <erudolph@p...> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Steve... I am a newbie to this BO printing but it appears to me 
>> that using the
> above
>> workflow, the R800 is printing in color.
>>
>> Ed
>
> P.S.   ....I am using a Macintosh with OS X.

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-17 by edrudolpho

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale <stevekale@b...> 
wrote:
> Ed, thanks.  What is it that makes you think it is printing in colour?  For
> example, if I select Black in the 2100 driver under Print Settings -> Ink
> and then go to Colour Management, Colour Control is selected but Colour Sync
> and No Colour Adjustment are greyed out.  This is still black ink only
> printing.
> 
> Steve

Hi Steve.  It's early morning here and there is some daylight.  I believe the R800 is 
printing in color when black printing is selected because the prints have a cast that 
changes depending on the temperature of the light.  Also because on a 21 step gray 
scale print, the midtones have a different cast than the highlight and the shadow 
chips.  And when examined through a loupe, the chips do appear to be composed of 
different color dots.

Ed

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-17 by edrudolpho

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carl Schofield <scho@m...> 
wrote:
> Ed,
> 
> Could you tell us what paper and driver settings you used?  Also, how 
> did you determine that the R800 was printing in color?  Both the photo 
> K and matte K inks are quite warm in tone, so a warm brown print tone 
> does not necessarily mean that color inks were used.
> 
> Carl

Hi Carl.... as I said in an earlier post, I'm pretty new to digital printing, color 
management, etc.  And so I can't really participate int he discussion at the level you 
have been having it on this forum.  But.... here are your answers:

1. Papers used were Epson Premium Glossy and a couple of prints on Epson Enhanced 
Matte.

2. I tried various settings.  At first I simply tried printing in color using the profiles 
supplied with the printer.  I selected the correct paper profile in proof setup.  In the 
printer driver the source profile was the same as that selected in the proof setup and 
no color management was selected.  When I saw that these prints did not appear 
neutral I repeated everything as before except selected Black instead of Color.  When 
this is done, as Steve Kale mentioned, "No Color Management" is not an option.

3.  Finally, after reading steve's post last night, I printed a 21 step file that I 
downloaded.  This was done using the BO workflow specified by Seve, i.e, Assign 
Profile Gray Gamma 2.1, in the Print Preview select "Same as Source," and then in 
Printer driver select Black.

hope this helps and that soon we can be printing black only with this printer :-)
ed

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-17 by Martin Sluka

At 09:16 -0500 17.2.2004, Carl Schofield wrote:
*******************************************

>Could you tell us what paper and driver settings you used?  Also, how
>did you determine that the R800 was printing in color?  Both the photo
>K and matte K inks are quite warm in tone, so a warm brown print tone
>does not necessarily mean that color inks were used.

Carl,

if you see with help of loupe cyan, blue, red, yellow dots, it is 
quite difficult imagine they come from only black ink.

I may scan the sample I have and send it to.

Martin
--

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-17 by Carl Schofield

Ed,

Sounds like you have the correct settings for BO in point 3, but 
strange that the printer is using the color inks.  In the print 
settings where you selected black for ink type did you also click an 
"Advanced" button to select print resolution setting and what did you 
choose?  Also, after moving to the color management tab what were the 
options?  On the 2200 the only choice is "Vivid" if black ink has been 
selected.

Carl
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Tuesday, February 17, 2004, at 10:47  AM, edrudolpho wrote:

> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carl Schofield 
> <scho@m...>
> wrote:
>> Ed,
>>
>> Could you tell us what paper and driver settings you used?  Also, how
>> did you determine that the R800 was printing in color?  Both the photo
>> K and matte K inks are quite warm in tone, so a warm brown print tone
>> does not necessarily mean that color inks were used.
>>
>> Carl
>
> Hi Carl.... as I said in an earlier post, I'm pretty new to digital 
> printing, color
> management, etc.  And so I can't really participate int he discussion 
> at the level you
> have been having it on this forum.  But.... here are your answers:
>
> 1. Papers used were Epson Premium Glossy and a couple of prints on 
> Epson Enhanced
> Matte.
>
> 2. I tried various settings.  At first I simply tried printing in 
> color using the profiles
> supplied with the printer.  I selected the correct paper profile in 
> proof setup.  In the
> printer driver the source profile was the same as that selected in the 
> proof setup and
> no color management was selected.  When I saw that these prints did 
> not appear
> neutral I repeated everything as before except selected Black instead 
> of Color.  When
> this is done, as Steve Kale mentioned, "No Color Management" is not an 
> option.
>
> 3.  Finally, after reading steve's post last night, I printed a 21 
> step file that I
> downloaded.  This was done using the BO workflow specified by Seve, 
> i.e, Assign
> Profile Gray Gamma 2.1, in the Print Preview select "Same as Source," 
> and then in
> Printer driver select Black.
>
> hope this helps and that soon we can be printing black only with this 
> printer :-)
> ed

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-17 by edrudolpho

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carl 
Schofield <scho@m...> wrote:
> Ed,
> 
> Sounds like you have the correct settings for BO in point 3, but 
> strange that the printer is using the color inks.  In the print 
> settings where you selected black for ink type did you also click 
an 
> "Advanced" button to select print resolution setting and what 
did you 
> choose?  Also, after moving to the color management tab what 
were the 
> options?  On the 2200 the only choice is "Vivid" if black ink has 
been 
> selected.
> 
> Carl

tonight, at home, i'll try to make a screen capture of the printer 
driver and tonight i will also make a BO print and scan it.  i don't 
have a scanner at home (where the R800 is) so this may take 
me a couple of days between shuttling back and forth from home 
to work.  can someone direct me to instructions for uploading 
images to the group?

ed

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-17 by sanfo2003

I found a trick that works in trying to figure out what color inks a 
printer is using for BW output is to peek inside the printer while 
it's printing and look at the output as the head is laying down the 
ink. It usually takes several passes of the head to build up full 
density so after the first couple of passes you can see what's going 
on before the ink buildup obscures it.

Another technique is to abort the print job half way thru the job 
then look at the ink buildup zone with a loupe.

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-19 by sanfo2003

Was down at the local CompUSA where they were just putting out their 
first demo R800. Really nice folks there and they gave me total 
access to the printer thru a Mac and even gave me a stack of Epson 
Premium Glossy and Enhanced Matte paper and said, "Tell us what you 
think when you're done." The lighting in the store was awful, seemed 
like mercury vapor lights or something, but fortunately is was 
daylight outside and they said to feel free to take prints outside 
the store to check out -- obviously this place is gonna get my 
business!

The color prints with the glossy clearcoat, in my opinion, were 
nothing short of stunning and set a new standard; but it was BW I was 
most interested in. To summarize BW: not as good as meticulus 
techniques with third party quad inksets but light years ahead of 
anything out of the box by Epson yet. It seems Epson has finally not 
totally ignored BW in a printer. The glossy coating on Premium Glossy 
using "Black" printing gives a cool-toned print and looks very 
similar to conventional 8x10 glossy celebrity publicity photos I've 
seen. Metamerism between the awful store lighting and daylight was 
noticable but just barely. Colored inks are definitely used to print 
BW and I could see at least Cyan and Magenta being used as the ink 
was being laid down. Prints on EAM were smooth and cool-neutral. Also 
no cartridge change from glossy to matte -- nice! As a side note, I'd 
love to see someone do a shootout with ImagePrint on the 2200 vs. the 
R800's stock BW output. 

The retail price was $400. If this same machine could print 13x19 I 
would have bought it in a heartbeat. It blows the 2200 out of the 
water so I guess that's why its not made in the larger size, YET.

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-19 by Martin Sluka

At 06:34 +0000 19.2.2004, sanfo2003 wrote:
*******************************************

>I'd
>love to see someone do a shootout with ImagePrint on the 2200 vs. the
>R800's stock BW output.

Exatly this I did on PaperWorld (Frankfurt) February 3th. See archive 
from this Monday.

I'll scan both pictures and send it to file section.

Martin


--

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-19 by Carl Schofield

When you made the B&W prints with the R800 did you set the driver for 
black only printing?  An earlier post by Ed also indicated that the 
driver does not behave as expected - that is it uses color inks even 
though black ink only is specified.  I wonder if this is intentional on 
Epson's part or if there is a problem with the current version of the 
printer driver.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Thursday, February 19, 2004, at 01:34  AM, sanfo2003 wrote:

> Was down at the local CompUSA where they were just putting out their
> first demo R800. Really nice folks there and they gave me total
> access to the printer thru a Mac and even gave me a stack of Epson
> Premium Glossy and Enhanced Matte paper and said, "Tell us what you
> think when you're done." The lighting in the store was awful, seemed
> like mercury vapor lights or something, but fortunately is was
> daylight outside and they said to feel free to take prints outside
> the store to check out -- obviously this place is gonna get my
> business!
>
> The color prints with the glossy clearcoat, in my opinion, were
> nothing short of stunning and set a new standard; but it was BW I was
> most interested in. To summarize BW: not as good as meticulus
> techniques with third party quad inksets but light years ahead of
> anything out of the box by Epson yet. It seems Epson has finally not
> totally ignored BW in a printer. The glossy coating on Premium Glossy
> using "Black" printing gives a cool-toned print and looks very
> similar to conventional 8x10 glossy celebrity publicity photos I've
> seen. Metamerism between the awful store lighting and daylight was
> noticable but just barely. Colored inks are definitely used to print
> BW and I could see at least Cyan and Magenta being used as the ink
> was being laid down. Prints on EAM were smooth and cool-neutral. Also
> no cartridge change from glossy to matte -- nice! As a side note, I'd
> love to see someone do a shootout with ImagePrint on the 2200 vs. the
> R800's stock BW output.
>
> The retail price was $400. If this same machine could print 13x19 I
> would have bought it in a heartbeat. It blows the 2200 out of the
> water so I guess that's why its not made in the larger size, YET.

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-19 by edrudolpho

I very much like Sandy Cornelius' description of the "Black Only" printing on EPG as 
looking like a celebrity head shot.  That's a very accurate description.  On Enhanced 
Matte it looks somewhat like a sepia toned older print.

I mentioned in an earlier post that the first dozen or so prints I made were made with 
grayscale images, using the supplied Epson profiles, in Color mode.  The next dozen 
or so were made in Black mode.  After checking the ink use this morning, I find that 
the only cartridges showing any depletion are the Gloss, Magenta and Cyan 
cartridges.

A couple of other notes:  a poster on the Epson R800 forum at photo-i.co.uk has 
written that his ink use display, on the black catridges suddenly went from none used 
to quite a bit used.

And, Carl Schofield sent a link to a new R800 driver this morning.  I find that it adds 
capabilities for different types of paper use but doesn't change the Black mode to one 
that uses only Black ink.

And, the ink that gets the most use when printing glossy, in my case, is the Gloss 
Optimizer.  This is because I tend to have from a 1/2 to 1" white border or more on 
glossy prints.  The Optimizer is laid down wherever there is blank paper.

On the whole, I like this printer quite a bit and look forward to driver updates and a 
wider format version.... :-)

Ed

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-19 by sanfo2003

> When you made the B&W prints with the R800 did you set the driver 
for black only printing?

The driver window allows two options, "Black" or "Color", if I 
remember right. I selected "Black". I don't think it said "Black 
Only." Also, at least on the demo machine I used, there was no 
noticable sepia tone on EAM -- it was smooth and neutral with a 
slight leaning to the cool side. I wasn't able to print a 
gradient/step-wedge, but that would be the next thing to do in 
checking out the printer.

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-19 by Carl Schofield

It sure sounds like Epson is doing something different with this R800 
driver (compared to the 2200) when black ink is specified in the driver 
setting.  It would be very interesting to see a high resolution scan of 
a step wedge printed with the driver set to "Black" ink.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Thursday, February 19, 2004, at 01:54  PM, sanfo2003 wrote:

>
>> When you made the B&W prints with the R800 did you set the driver
> for black only printing?
>
> The driver window allows two options, "Black" or "Color", if I
> remember right. I selected "Black". I don't think it said "Black
> Only." Also, at least on the demo machine I used, there was no
> noticable sepia tone on EAM -- it was smooth and neutral with a
> slight leaning to the cool side. I wasn't able to print a
> gradient/step-wedge, but that would be the next thing to do in
> checking out the printer.

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-19 by Steve Kale

FYI the driver for the 2100 simply says Black and yet is black ink only.
Would seem odd that Epson would discard this ability with a much improved
droplet size.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "sanfo2003" <SandyCornelius@...>
Reply-To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:54:46 -0000
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor  of the 2200/2100 for B&W?


> When you made the B&W prints with the R800 did you set the driver
for black only printing?

The driver window allows two options, "Black" or "Color", if I
remember right. I selected "Black". I don't think it said "Black
Only." Also, at least on the demo machine I used, there was no
noticable sepia tone on EAM -- it was smooth and neutral with a
slight leaning to the cool side. I wasn't able to print a
gradient/step-wedge, but that would be the next thing to do in
checking out the printer.



Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
they are often being updated.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
membership without notice.
- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from
the membership.
- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and
Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines” in the Files section:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/

BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE “OWNER” AND
“MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU
FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY
DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS,
GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  “OWNER” AND
“MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY
TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR
ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY
THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER
MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.




Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
* http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/
*  
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
* DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Uns
ubscribe> 
*  
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-19 by sanfo2003

"The R800 blows the 2200 out of the water..."

> Sorry for being skeptical but that comment seems fantastic.  Could 
you elaborate?  How so?


Well of course I must hedge by stating that this is my opinion. 
The gamut of blues is extended over that of my 2200. The 
dither pattern, dot size and resolution is finer, and not having to 
change out photo/matte black cartridges, at least for me, is a big 
deal. I have to do that a lot on my 2200 and not only is it kind of a 
hassle but I think its costing me about a buck in ink every time I do 
it (granted, nothing compared to the $100 a pop in ink it costs in 
the 7600). Also, the R800 prints faster than my 2200 and can print on 
a CD whereas the 2200 is not capable of that. Out of the box the 2200 
is unusable for BW printing due to color casts and metamerism, 
whereas the R800 prints BW very, very well. And last but not 
least, my 2200 is unusable for printing on glossy paper due to 
bronzing (PrintGuard will work on semigloss but its an extra step, 
smelly, and a hassle); but the R800 with its no hassle clear coating 
really shines (pardon the expression) in this regard -- the glossy 
prints are just beautiful.

The one big (again, pardon the expression) advantage the 2200 has 
over the R800 is that it can print at SuperA3 (13x19) size. So, 
that's why I say except for the size the R800 is a much better 
printer than my 2200.

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-19 by Mark Hahn

did you compare it to the hp 7660?  I would rather go with Epson 
after seeing the problems with the 7660, but only if I could really 
get "gallery quality" prints out of it.  I think you could get 
gallery prints from the 7660 once everything was working properly, 
though I don't think it would be possible to display hp Premium Plus 
Glossy without mounting (due to the awful cockling issue).

thanks,

mark

...
> It blows the 2200 out of the
> > water 
...

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-19 by Steve Kale

Just as an fyi, the 2100 can print on CDs.  I¹m surprised the 2200 (same
printer) can¹t.... Here¹s hoping the 4000 gets remodelled as a large R800.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "sanfo2003" <SandyCornelius@...>
Reply-To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:59:00 -0000
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor  of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

"The R800 blows the 2200 out of the water..."

> Sorry for being skeptical but that comment seems fantastic.  Could
you elaborate?  How so?


Well of course I must hedge by stating that this is my opinion.
The gamut of blues is extended over that of my 2200. The
dither pattern, dot size and resolution is finer, and not having to
change out photo/matte black cartridges, at least for me, is a big
deal. I have to do that a lot on my 2200 and not only is it kind of a
hassle but I think its costing me about a buck in ink every time I do
it (granted, nothing compared to the $100 a pop in ink it costs in
the 7600). Also, the R800 prints faster than my 2200 and can print on
a CD whereas the 2200 is not capable of that. Out of the box the 2200
is unusable for BW printing due to color casts and metamerism,
whereas the R800 prints BW very, very well. And last but not
least, my 2200 is unusable for printing on glossy paper due to
bronzing (PrintGuard will work on semigloss but its an extra step,
smelly, and a hassle); but the R800 with its no hassle clear coating
really shines (pardon the expression) in this regard -- the glossy
prints are just beautiful.

The one big (again, pardon the expression) advantage the 2200 has
over the R800 is that it can print at SuperA3 (13x19) size. So,
that's why I say except for the size the R800 is a much better
printer than my 2200.



Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
they are often being updated.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
membership without notice.
- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from
the membership.
- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and
Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines” in the Files section:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/

BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE “OWNER” AND
“MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU
FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY
DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS,
GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  “OWNER” AND
“MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY
TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR
ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY
THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER
MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Click Here 
<http://rd.yahoo.com/SIG=12choc15j/M=274551.4550177.5761904.1261774/D=egroup
web/S=1705019182:HM/EXP=1077307174/A=2019528/R=2/*http://ad.doubleclick.net/
jump/N3349.yahoo1/B1282054.27;abr=!ie4;abr=!ie5;sz=300x250;code=18634;dcopt=
rcl;ord=1077220774539074?>


Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
* http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/
*  
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
* DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Uns
ubscribe> 
*  
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-20 by PhotoWorkshops Partnership

On 19/2/04 11:19 pm, "sanfo2003" <SandyCornelius@...>"
<DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

> Also, the R800 prints faster than my 2200 and can print on
> a CD whereas the 2200 is not capable of that.

Sandy

The 2100 (UK/Euro equivalent of the 2200) is supplied with a front loading
CD feeder and a blank inkjet printable CD-RW as part of the package. Are you
saying you don't get this accessory in the US?

--
Regards
David Prakel

Centre of Britain PhotoWorkshops Partnership
www.photopartners.co.uk

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-20 by edrudolpho

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Martin 
Sluka <martinsluka@m...> wrote:
> At 06:34 +0000 19.2.2004, sanfo2003 wrote:
> *******************************************
> 
> >I'd
> >love to see someone do a shootout with ImagePrint on the 
2200 vs. the
> >R800's stock BW output.
> 
> Exatly this I did on PaperWorld (Frankfurt) February 3th. See 
archive 
> from this Monday.
> 
> I'll scan both pictures and send it to file section.
> 
> Martin
> 

Hi all.... I made a high magnification scan of the 21 step gray 
scale chart.  Magnified a 1" x 2" section up to about 2 feet by 4 
foot section.  It's full of colored dots. :-) although appearing 
reasonably neutral when viewed at normal scale.  Unfortunately I 
am at work and the scanner today was moved to a computer 
that's not on the network.  So, you'll have to take my word for it for 
the moment.

Ed Rudolph

Re: Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-20 by sanfo2003

> The 2100 (UK/Euro equivalent of the 2200) is supplied with a front 
loading CD feeder and a blank inkjet printable CD-RW as part of the 
package. Are you saying you don't get this accessory in the US?



No, its not included with the 2200, at least when I got mine a 
little over a year ago. 

Oops, I'm starting to get a little off thread here -- feel free to 
email me offlist and perhaps I can give more info. on the 2200. 
Thanks.

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-20 by Carl Schofield

Ed,

What color dots did you see?  Were they just cyan, magenta, and LK or  
also yellow?

Carl
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Friday, February 20, 2004, at 03:26  PM, edrudolpho wrote:

> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Martin
> Sluka <martinsluka@m...> wrote:
>> At 06:34 +0000 19.2.2004, sanfo2003 wrote:
>> *******************************************
>>
>>> I'd
>>> love to see someone do a shootout with ImagePrint on the
> 2200 vs. the
>>> R800's stock BW output.
>>
>> Exatly this I did on PaperWorld (Frankfurt) February 3th. See
> archive
>> from this Monday.
>>
>> I'll scan both pictures and send it to file section.
>>
>> Martin
>>
>
> Hi all.... I made a high magnification scan of the 21 step gray
> scale chart.  Magnified a 1" x 2" section up to about 2 feet by 4
> foot section.  It's full of colored dots. :-) although appearing
> reasonably neutral when viewed at normal scale.  Unfortunately I
> am at work and the scanner today was moved to a computer
> that's not on the network.  So, you'll have to take my word for it for
> the moment.
>
> Ed Rudolph
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor  
> ---------------------~-->
> Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
> Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US &  
> Canada.
> http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/ucIolB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ~->
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other  
> resources as they are often being updated.
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish  
> to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting  
> this same page.
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to  
> keep them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or  
> flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from  
> the membership without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital  
> B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be  
> removed from the membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and  
> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group  
> Owner and Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines” in the  
> Files section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
>
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE  
> PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE “OWNER”  
> AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE  
> LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL,  
> CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO,  
> DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE  
> LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT  
> YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES),  
> RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW,  
> THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF  
> YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD  
> PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER  
> MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-21 by edrudolpho

I'll have to check that file on Monday, Carl.  I was expecting to see Cyan & Magenta 
and was surprised to see more, but that was probably blue and green.

Ed


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carl Schofield <scho@m...> 
wrote:
> Ed,
> 
> What color dots did you see?  Were they just cyan, magenta, and LK or  
> also yellow?
> 
> Carl
> On Friday, February 20, 2004, at 03:26  PM, edrudolpho wrote:
> 
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Martin
> > Sluka <martinsluka@m...> wrote:
> >> At 06:34 +0000 19.2.2004, sanfo2003 wrote:
> >> *******************************************
> >>
> >>> I'd
> >>> love to see someone do a shootout with ImagePrint on the
> > 2200 vs. the
> >>> R800's stock BW output.
> >>
> >> Exatly this I did on PaperWorld (Frankfurt) February 3th. See
> > archive
> >> from this Monday.
> >>
> >> I'll scan both pictures and send it to file section.
> >>
> >> Martin
> >>
> >
> > Hi all.... I made a high magnification scan of the 21 step gray
> > scale chart.  Magnified a 1" x 2" section up to about 2 feet by 4
> > foot section.  It's full of colored dots. :-) although appearing
> > reasonably neutral when viewed at normal scale.  Unfortunately I
> > am at work and the scanner today was moved to a computer
> > that's not on the network.  So, you'll have to take my word for it for
> > the moment.
> >
> > Ed Rudolph
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor  
> > ---------------------~-->
> > Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
> > Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US &  
> > Canada.
> > http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
> > http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/ucIolB/TM
> > 
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> > ~->
> >
> > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other  
> > resources as they are often being updated.
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> >
> > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish  
> > to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting  
> > this same page.
> >
> > Please follow these basic guidelines:
> > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to  
> > keep them short.
> > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or  
> > flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from  
> > the membership without notice.
> > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital  
> > B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be  
> > removed from the membership.
> > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and  
> > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group  
> > Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the  
> > Files section:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> >
> > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE  
> > PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE 
"OWNER"  
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE  
> > LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL,  
> > CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO,  
> > DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE  
> > LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT  
> > YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES),  
> > RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW,  
> > THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF  
> > YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD  
> > PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER  
> > MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >

Re: [Digital BW] Epson R800 as successor of the 2200/2100 for B&W?

2004-02-21 by Martin Sluka

At 18:54 +0000 19.2.2004, sanfo2003 wrote:
*******************************************

>The driver window allows two options, "Black" or "Color", if I
>remember right.

That is standard Epson switch. But Grayscale option I saw was in 
Advanced area - in part where one may choose the Glossy finisher use 
and others.

Martin
--

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.