Digital BW, The Print

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: ncm 
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 5:33 AM
  Subject: [Digital BW] Re:Esthetics of Sloppiness: Burning Questions of: Is it Authenticity or is it Marketing 101?


  Steadman,

  Many years ago I printed all my 35mm negs full frame with a sloppy border 
  from a hand-sawed out neg carrier and yes, it was partially bragging that 
  I could catch exactly what I wanted and nothing more right in the 
  viewfinder (g). I've gotton over that. Now in darkroom prints I'll do it 
  if the image warrants - if it gives the image something - but not 
  otherwise. In digital/inkjet I didn't do it at all until very recently. 
  In fact the current Print Exhange print is the first time I've used that 
  effect (using a scan of one of my old silver prints to get the same 
  border from my venerable negative carrier). I like the effect for some 
  images - it gives them a look almost like a movie frame, an instant out 
  of a scene that is going on. It is appropriate for some images and not 
  for others. I do generally like a hair-thin black border defining the 
  edge of a photo from the white paper surface and have occasionally played 
  around with a larger border picking up a grey from the print itself. This 
  is basic PS technique but I've never messed with the canned pre-packaged 
  borders. Nothing against them particularly, just don't need them for the 
  fairly simple stuff I like.

  In conclusion, it *is* a fashion that comes and goes over the years (and 
  has been around a long time) but I think it should be nothing more than 
  an aesthetic decision based on the image itself - some look better 
  framed, some don't.

  And I'll even sometimes crop photos now if that produces a stronger image 
  (g).

  Cheers,

  Nina

  >Taking a "stance" here for esthetics (which is a personal choice) I think 
  >the "trendy" "arty" looking "sloppy borders" look is...in a 
  >word....ridiculous (anyone feeling offended?)
  >
  >I mean if you take a look around you will see it everywhere.  In many 
  >cases I just don't see the justification.  And with "digital" images and 
  >"digital edges" available, it just seems ludicrous (getting anybody's goat 
  >yet?).  
  >
  >Just the other day I looked at a web site for professioal photographers.  
  >This site displays and prints images for pros who then sell them to the 
  >brides and others.  The site offers a "sloppy border" look for "art 
  >proofs" that are from scanned 35mm film or digital files.  
  >
  >QUESTION #1: 
  >What is the sense of this?  Is it so important to show that the "full 
  >frame" was used? Come on!

        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
              ADVERTISEMENT
             
       
       

  Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

  Please follow these basic guidelines:
  - Include your full name with your message.
  - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
  - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
  - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
  - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
  - Complete your Yahoo profile.
  - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. 




  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]