Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Milage on C84 with MIS EZ B&W?

Milage on C84 with MIS EZ B&W?

2004-06-09 by siklosg

Can someone please tell me how many 8x10 can I print with the Epson
C84 using a set of MIS EZ inks? I could not find this on their website.

Thanks!

RE: [Digital BW] Milage on C84 with MIS EZ B&W?

2004-06-10 by Paul Roark

>Can someone please tell me how many 8x10 can I print with the Epson
>C84 using a set of MIS EZ inks? I could not find this on their website.

MIS's response:  "The correct answer to this is.... the same number of
prints you will get with Epson cartridges.   No one can predict the exact
number of prints because every image is different."

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

Re: [Digital BW] Milage on C84 with MIS EZ B&W?

2004-06-10 by siklosg

But what about on average? I'm trying to compare it with my HP 7960,
which gives me about 12 8x10 per #59 cartridge.

A ballpark would be fine.

Thanks,

-Gabor


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark"
<paul.roark@v...> wrote:
> 
> >Can someone please tell me how many 8x10 can I print with the Epson
> >C84 using a set of MIS EZ inks? I could not find this on their website.
> 
> MIS's response:  "The correct answer to this is.... the same number of
> prints you will get with Epson cartridges.   No one can predict the
exact
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> number of prints because every image is different."
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com

Re: [Digital BW] Milage on C84 with MIS EZ B&W?

2004-06-10 by D. Hill

Gabor,

You will get much, much more than 12 8x10's with the
EZ BW inks.

Don


--- siklosg <siklosg@...> wrote:
> But what about on average? I'm trying to compare it
> with my HP 7960,
> which gives me about 12 8x10 per #59 cartridge.
> 
> A ballpark would be fine.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Gabor



	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends.  Fun.  Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.