Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Fade Test -- New inksets

Fade Test -- New inksets

2004-07-19 by Paul Roark

I'm just back from Golden Trout High Sierra Camp, and an important fade test
has reached the 600 hour point where I think I can draw some interesting
information.  It's almost all very good news for B&W printing with inkjets.

 

Here are some highlights.  

 

All test strips were on Epson Enhanced Matte paper.

 

I'm using the X-Rite Lab readings to summarize some of the potentially
important results.  I separate the lightness changes (Delta L) from the
chromaticity (hue shift) changes (which I'll call Delta E [Error] here).

 

I think we understand that our images will probably slowly move in hue
toward the base warm carbon tone.  However, I've very interested in having
the base warm carbon image not fade (become lighter) to the maximum extent
possible.  So, I think the separated "fade" and color shift results are more
informative than a combined total Delta E.

 

(Delta E for chromaticity is the standard Pythagorean theorem distance
between starting and ending (a,b) points.)  

 

For now I'm looking at the 50% midtones only.

 

1.  UT2 with neutral curve.

 

This was arguably the best neutral ink I've tested.  So, it's worth using as
a standard for now.  (UT-FSN would be about the same.)

 

L (lightness, with 100 being white) went from 57.46 to 57.70.  So, it
lightened or faded about 0.4%.

 

Delta E = 2.7

 

2.  UT2 with carbon curve.

 

The carbon image is what I consider the most stable, at least in terms of
visual density fading.  We know that it will yellow a bit.

 

L went from 56.85 to 56.76.  It actually darkened a bit (about 0.16%).

 

Delta E = 2.2

 

3.  7500 6-04 (first UT-8 beta (new blue toner)), neutral curve.

 

I loaded my 7500 with a new UT1 toner that is composed predominantly of a
new UT-family blue ink from MIS.  (Not publicly available, as far as I
know.)  I think this toner approach will be appear in UT-8 for the 4000.

 

L went from 56.58 to 56.46.  It darkened a bit (about 0.2%).  This is the
first neutral ink that I've tested to make it into the same class with Eboni
and carbon UT in that is actually darkens a bit in my 600 hour test.  This
is very good news.

 

Delta E = 2.5.   This overall number hides the more important result that
the loss of magenta (green shift) is much lower than UT2-N and very close to
the carbon shift.

 

4.  UltraChrome-VT with the Carbon curve

 

L went from 56.41 to 56.73.  So, it fades a bit (about 0.5%) and does not
darken the way the MIS carbon inks do.

 

Delta E = 2.5

 

5.  UC-VT with neutral curve

 

L went from 57.19 to 57.83.  So, it faded a bit more than 1%.

 

Delta E = 2.8

 

This may not seem great, but this result is good and indicates the new base
(glycerol + distilled water) is working.

 

6.  UC-VT, neutral curve, PremierArt spray.

 

L went from 53.47 to 53.93.  So, it lightened about 0.8%.

 

Delta E = 1.8.  Wow, a new champ of color stability.  This PremierArt spray,
as in other tests I've done, makes a major change in UltraChrome stability.
(The B72 spray was not in the same class.  The changes for MIS inks with the
PremierArt spray are more on the order of a 10% improvement as opposed to
this UC 35% improvement.)

 

This is very significant.  Ink mixers now have the UC inks as a base to make
excellent B&W inksets that have the coated Epson pigments and any other
attributes people may think Epson inks may have.  I'll publish the first
draft formula for this totally off-the-shelf inkset.  I will stay with MIS
inks for UT-8, however.  I like the superior carbon stability. 

 

It's good and getting better.

 

7.  IB-FS 

 

L went from 62.95 to 62.91.  So, it darkened just a hair.

 

Delta E = 2.5

 

This is my first inkset to use a toner pigment from outside the inkjet
field.  It uses a blue pigment that, by itself, offsets the carbon tone to
make a more neutral (slightly "selenium") print.  I used the MIS UT base, so
it sticks on glossy paper.  This is not ready for the next generation, but
it demonstrates several important things.  First, we're not stuck with the
inkjet field pigments.  It's a much larger world out there.  Second, with
this variety of pigments available all sorts of potential new systems become
possible.  This ink, for example, could be the blue end of a hybrid
Lab-space inkset that acted to neutralize the carbon.  The standard CMY
could be overlaid, or the creative might want to go to red-green Lab a axis.
I also see this merging with water color art. 

 

Fun stuff.

 

Paul

www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.paulroark.com/>  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Fade Test -- New inksets

2004-07-20 by Sam McCandless

Congratulations, Paul. You're having a good summer, and you deserve 
it. Thanks for keeping us up to date.
--
Sam
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>I'm just back from Golden Trout High Sierra Camp, and an important fade test
>has reached the 600 hour point where I think I can draw some interesting
>information.  It's almost all very good news for B&W printing with inkjets.
>[big snip]

Re: Fade Test -- New inksets

2004-07-20 by Clayton Jones

Hello Paul,

Thanks for the update.  Lot's of interesting things to think about.

>I separate the lightness changes (Delta L) from the
>chromaticity (hue shift) changes (which I'll call 
>Delta E [Error] here).

I especially appreciate having these separated.

Thanks very much for all the great work.

Regards,
Clayton


Info on black and white digital printing at    
http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.