Windows QTR?
2004-08-05 by Tom Husband
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC
Thread
2004-08-05 by Tom Husband
Roy, Just curious about your progress on this. I bet a lot of folks can't wait to get their hands on it. Tom
2004-08-05 by Roy Harrington
I've just uploaded the first release of QuadToneRIP for the PC. The initial version supports the 2200 with UltraChrome Inks. Other printers and canned profiles will be available fairly soon. Support for creating your own profiles is not available yet. Roy www.harrington.com
2004-08-06 by tflyfish2002
Wow, thats great news, goodbye Imageprint! Are you expecting to do a version for the Epson 4000? Regards, Barry \ -- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Roy Harrington" <roy@h...> wrote:
> > I've just uploaded the first release of QuadToneRIP for the PC. > The initial version supports the 2200 with UltraChrome Inks. > > Other printers and canned profiles will be available fairly soon. > Support for creating your own profiles is not available yet. > > Roy > www.harrington.com
2004-08-06 by Tom Husband
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "tflyfish2002" <barry@s...> wrote: > Wow, thats great news, goodbye Imageprint! Are you expecting to do a > version for the Epson 4000? And the 1280? Hope you don't regret this, Roy. Tom
2004-08-06 by Ernst Dinkla
Roy Harrington wrote: > I've just uploaded the first release of QuadToneRIP for the PC. > The initial version supports the 2200 with UltraChrome Inks. > > Other printers and canned profiles will be available fairly soon. > Support for creating your own profiles is not available yet. > > Roy > www.harrington.com Good new Roy. Thank you. Epson 9000/9500 with Ultratone VM inkset (the very first) profiles / linearisation later on ? Ernst
2004-08-06 by Bailey Donnally
Roy, this is extremely welcome news. And it will become even more welcome when this software supports the Epson 1280. When I went to your web site and it said that the QTR is for Windows XP Pro. Will it work also on Windows XP Home? Bailey --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Roy Harrington" <roy@h...> wrote:
> > I've just uploaded the first release of QuadToneRIP for the PC. > The initial version supports the 2200 with UltraChrome Inks. > > Other printers and canned profiles will be available fairly soon. > Support for creating your own profiles is not available yet. > > Roy > www.harrington.com
2004-08-07 by richard_h95050
Hi Roy, Just wanted to let you know that I downloaded and installed your QTR/XP files onto one of my Win2K machines, followed the very simple direcions you've provided and made my first print in less than 5 minutes. Excellent. You're the best! Richard --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Roy Harrington" <roy@h...> wrote:
> > I've just uploaded the first release of QuadToneRIP for the PC. > The initial version supports the 2200 with UltraChrome Inks. > > Other printers and canned profiles will be available fairly soon. > Support for creating your own profiles is not available yet. > > Roy > www.harrington.com
2004-08-07 by Nelson Ricciardi
Richard Could you please share with us paper size file size (inches) dpi that you´re using? Thank you --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "richard_h95050" <richardh@j...> wrote: > Hi Roy, > > Just wanted to let you know that I downloaded and installed your > QTR/XP files onto one of my Win2K machines, followed the very simple > direcions you've provided and made my first print in less than 5 > minutes. > > Excellent. You're the best! > > Richard > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Roy Harrington"
> <roy@h...> wrote: > > > > I've just uploaded the first release of QuadToneRIP for the PC. > > The initial version supports the 2200 with UltraChrome Inks. > > > > Other printers and canned profiles will be available fairly soon. > > Support for creating your own profiles is not available yet. > > > > Roy > > www.harrington.com
2004-08-07 by richard_h95050
Hi Nelson, I'd be happy to share, but must say I did nothing whatsoever besides install and print. I used the defaults exactly as they are in the files Roy provided without changing even a line of text: 1. Letter size EEM (or EAM, depending on your geography) 2. Image size was 5X5 at 360 ppi (a low-key, studio portrait of an infant with very smooth and subtle tonal transitions) 3. Image in RGB mode, 8 bit, desaturated using modified c/m technique Since my first post I have also made a couple of more prints using the same settings, included some high-key images and enjoyed the same fine results. I haven't even started to tweak anything because I'm having too much fun! Hope this helps, but Roy has already done all the work ;>) Kind regards, Richard --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Nelson Ricciardi" <nelson_@r...> wrote: > Richard > > Could you please share with us > > paper size > file size (inches) > dpi > > that you´re using? > > Thank you > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@...m, "richard_h95050" > <richardh@j...> wrote: > > Hi Roy, > > > > Just wanted to let you know that I downloaded and installed your > > QTR/XP files onto one of my Win2K machines, followed the very simple > > direcions you've provided and made my first print in less than 5 > > minutes. > > > > Excellent. You're the best! > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Roy > Harrington" > > <roy@h...> wrote: > > > > > > I've just uploaded the first release of QuadToneRIP for the PC. > > > The initial version supports the 2200 with UltraChrome Inks. > > > > > > Other printers and canned profiles will be available fairly soon.
> > > Support for creating your own profiles is not available yet. > > > > > > Roy > > > www.harrington.com
2004-08-07 by Nelson Ricciardi
Thank you Richard I´m also having fun printing images smaller than 8x10 in 360 ppi. I´ll try a 5x5 using 720 ppi to see if it works. 8.5x11 in 720 ppi does not work for sure. Again, thanks a lot. Nelson
-----Original Message----- From: richard_h95050 [mailto:richardh@...] Sent: sábado, 7 de agosto de 2004 20:48 To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Announcement: QuadToneRIP for Windows XP Hi Nelson, I'd be happy to share, but must say I did nothing whatsoever besides install and print. I used the defaults exactly as they are in the files Roy provided without changing even a line of text: 1. Letter size EEM (or EAM, depending on your geography) 2. Image size was 5X5 at 360 ppi (a low-key, studio portrait of an infant with very smooth and subtle tonal transitions) 3. Image in RGB mode, 8 bit, desaturated using modified c/m technique Since my first post I have also made a couple of more prints using the same settings, included some high-key images and enjoyed the same fine results. I haven't even started to tweak anything because I'm having too much fun! Hope this helps, but Roy has already done all the work ;>) Kind regards, Richard --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Nelson Ricciardi" <nelson_@r...> wrote: > Richard > > Could you please share with us > > paper size > file size (inches) > dpi > > that you´re using? > > Thank you > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "richard_h95050" > <richardh@j...> wrote: > > Hi Roy, > > > > Just wanted to let you know that I downloaded and installed your > > QTR/XP files onto one of my Win2K machines, followed the very simple > > direcions you've provided and made my first print in less than 5 > > minutes. > > > > Excellent. You're the best! > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Roy > Harrington" > > <roy@h...> wrote: > > > > > > I've just uploaded the first release of QuadToneRIP for the PC. > > > The initial version supports the 2200 with UltraChrome Inks. > > > > > > Other printers and canned profiles will be available fairly soon. > > > Support for creating your own profiles is not available yet. > > > > > > Roy > > > www.harrington.com Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. Yahoo! Groups Links
2004-08-08 by Nelson Ricciardi
Richard and others Same image in 8x10. - 360 dpi, prints fine on letter size paper - 720 dpi, print is very bad, full of stripes
-----Original Message----- From: Nelson Ricciardi [mailto:nelson_@...] Sent: sábado, 7 de agosto de 2004 20:57 To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Re: Announcement: QuadToneRIP for Windows XP Thank you Richard I´m also having fun printing images smaller than 8x10 in 360 ppi. I´ll try a 5x5 using 720 ppi to see if it works. 8.5x11 in 720 ppi does not work for sure. Again, thanks a lot. Nelson -----Original Message----- From: richard_h95050 [mailto:richardh@...] Sent: sábado, 7 de agosto de 2004 20:48 To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Announcement: QuadToneRIP for Windows XP Hi Nelson, I'd be happy to share, but must say I did nothing whatsoever besides install and print. I used the defaults exactly as they are in the files Roy provided without changing even a line of text: 1. Letter size EEM (or EAM, depending on your geography) 2. Image size was 5X5 at 360 ppi (a low-key, studio portrait of an infant with very smooth and subtle tonal transitions) 3. Image in RGB mode, 8 bit, desaturated using modified c/m technique Since my first post I have also made a couple of more prints using the same settings, included some high-key images and enjoyed the same fine results. I haven't even started to tweak anything because I'm having too much fun! Hope this helps, but Roy has already done all the work ;>) Kind regards, Richard --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Nelson Ricciardi" <nelson_@r...> wrote: > Richard > > Could you please share with us > > paper size > file size (inches) > dpi > > that you´re using? > > Thank you > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "richard_h95050" > <richardh@j...> wrote: > > Hi Roy, > > > > Just wanted to let you know that I downloaded and installed your > > QTR/XP files onto one of my Win2K machines, followed the very simple > > direcions you've provided and made my first print in less than 5 > > minutes. > > > > Excellent. You're the best! > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Roy > Harrington" > > <roy@h...> wrote: > > > > > > I've just uploaded the first release of QuadToneRIP for the PC. > > > The initial version supports the 2200 with UltraChrome Inks. > > > > > > Other printers and canned profiles will be available fairly soon. > > > Support for creating your own profiles is not available yet. > > > > > > Roy > > > www.harrington.com Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. Yahoo! Groups Links Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. Yahoo! Groups Links
2004-08-08 by richard_h95050
Hi Nelson, I just ran an 8X10 @ 360 ppi, and the tonal transitions are still "smooth as a baby's bottom" -- I guess I can safely say that because the print is a studio shot of a newborn and mother, and that's the main subject matter ;>) Don't know what would happen over 8X10 or at 720 ppi, but since my machine has a stack of letter-size EEM in it, that's what I'm playing with. The only other question I have is regarding the need for the 720 ppi setting, and it's purely a theoretical question: I haven't tested 720 PPI with QTR to see if it causes any problems for me, but I also haven't found any reason to go to the higher res for my own work (admittedly a subjective choice). I'm also running other RIPs; Imageprint on my 9600, PiezoBW/Pro or Imageprint/Quad drivers on my 7000 and Paul Roark's UT-2 (both EZ and w/curves) on my 1280. All are fed at 360 ppi, and the output pleases my eye. John Cone used to suggest pushing as much resolution down the pipe as possible, but others present some interesting counterpoints about just how much of that information actually impacts the print, depending on how the RIP and/or driver handles the data, etc. -- and they're all a bit different. Roy would be able to answer that for us about QTR, I'm sure, and you as an artist are the best judge of your own results. Speaking subjectively, I've can't pragmatically differentiate between prints made using the additional ppi, and some of the RIP makers even suggest letting their software do the work and not adding to the file size unnecessarily. However, those are some of the ongoing technical conversations that cycle continuously through the forums, and I'm not trying to rekindle that flame (pun intended). The bottom line to me is -- "be happy, make your clients happy and make beautiful prints". Hope you get everything tweaked to meet your own personal workflow. It would be interesting to know if the difference in ppi is really evident in your prints -- I'm always interesting in taking a second look at things and questioning my own assumptions... ;>) Most of all, thanks to Roy for all his hard work, endless generousity, and giving us all an exciting reason to be even having these dialogs! Kind regards, Richard --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Nelson Ricciardi" <nelson_@r...> wrote: > Thank you Richard > > I´m also having fun printing images smaller than 8x10 in 360 ppi. > > I´ll try a 5x5 using 720 ppi to see if it works. 8.5x11 in 720 ppi does not > work for sure. > > Again, thanks a lot. > > Nelson > > -----Original Message----- > From: richard_h95050 [mailto:richardh@j...] > Sent: sábado, 7 de agosto de 2004 20:48 > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Announcement: QuadToneRIP for Windows XP > > > Hi Nelson, > > I'd be happy to share, but must say I did nothing whatsoever besides install > and print. I used the defaults exactly as they are in the files Roy provided > without changing even a line of text: > > 1. Letter size EEM (or EAM, depending on your geography) > > 2. Image size was 5X5 at 360 ppi (a low-key, studio portrait of an infant > with very smooth and subtle tonal transitions) > > 3. Image in RGB mode, 8 bit, desaturated using modified c/m technique > > Since my first post I have also made a couple of more prints using the same > settings, included some high-key images and enjoyed the same fine results. I > haven't even started to tweak anything because I'm having too much fun! > > Hope this helps, but Roy has already done all the work ;>) > > Kind regards, > Richard > > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Nelson Ricciardi" > <nelson_@r...> wrote: > > Richard > > > > Could you please share with us > > > > paper size > > file size (inches) > > dpi > > > > that you´re using? > > > > Thank you > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, > "richard_h95050" > > <richardh@j...> wrote: > > > Hi Roy, > > > > > > Just wanted to let you know that I downloaded and installed your > > > QTR/XP files onto one of my Win2K machines, followed the very > simple > > > direcions you've provided and made my first print in less than 5 > > > minutes. > > > > > > Excellent. You're the best! > > > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Roy > > Harrington" > > > <roy@h...> wrote: > > > > > > > > I've just uploaded the first release of QuadToneRIP for the PC.
> > > > The initial version supports the 2200 with UltraChrome Inks. > > > > > > > > Other printers and canned profiles will be available fairly > soon. > > > > Support for creating your own profiles is not available yet. > > > > > > > > Roy > > > > www.harrington.com > > > >
2004-08-08 by Nelson Ricciardi
Richard, What you say is correct. For most uses, 360 ppi is just perfect. Anyway, I was told that the native resolution of the 2100/2200 is 720 ppi. And for the 7600/9600, the native res is 360 ppi. I´m just trying to get the best quality I can out of my printer> I always believed that the right way to do was to send the file in the final res, ready to print. Michael Tapes, designer of Qimage, belongs to the group of people that believe the best approach is to send the file in the native resolution. That is the only reason I use this approach. I never did any test myself. I was just following a recipe that seems to work fine. But your points are all valid. Again, thank you for your input. Nelson
-----Original Message----- From: richard_h95050 [mailto:richardh@...] Sent: sábado, 7 de agosto de 2004 22:04 To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Announcement: QuadToneRIP for Windows XP Hi Nelson, I just ran an 8X10 @ 360 ppi, and the tonal transitions are still "smooth as a baby's bottom" -- I guess I can safely say that because the print is a studio shot of a newborn and mother, and that's the main subject matter ;>) Don't know what would happen over 8X10 or at 720 ppi, but since my machine has a stack of letter-size EEM in it, that's what I'm playing with. The only other question I have is regarding the need for the 720 ppi setting, and it's purely a theoretical question: I haven't tested 720 PPI with QTR to see if it causes any problems for me, but I also haven't found any reason to go to the higher res for my own work (admittedly a subjective choice). I'm also running other RIPs; Imageprint on my 9600, PiezoBW/Pro or Imageprint/Quad drivers on my 7000 and Paul Roark's UT-2 (both EZ and w/curves) on my 1280. All are fed at 360 ppi, and the output pleases my eye. John Cone used to suggest pushing as much resolution down the pipe as possible, but others present some interesting counterpoints about just how much of that information actually impacts the print, depending on how the RIP and/or driver handles the data, etc. -- and they're all a bit different. Roy would be able to answer that for us about QTR, I'm sure, and you as an artist are the best judge of your own results. Speaking subjectively, I've can't pragmatically differentiate between prints made using the additional ppi, and some of the RIP makers even suggest letting their software do the work and not adding to the file size unnecessarily. However, those are some of the ongoing technical conversations that cycle continuously through the forums, and I'm not trying to rekindle that flame (pun intended). The bottom line to me is -- "be happy, make your clients happy and make beautiful prints". Hope you get everything tweaked to meet your own personal workflow. It would be interesting to know if the difference in ppi is really evident in your prints -- I'm always interesting in taking a second look at things and questioning my own assumptions... ;>) Most of all, thanks to Roy for all his hard work, endless generousity, and giving us all an exciting reason to be even having these dialogs! Kind regards, Richard --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Nelson Ricciardi" <nelson_@r...> wrote: > Thank you Richard > > I´m also having fun printing images smaller than 8x10 in 360 ppi. > > I´ll try a 5x5 using 720 ppi to see if it works. 8.5x11 in 720 ppi does not > work for sure. > > Again, thanks a lot. > > Nelson > > -----Original Message----- > From: richard_h95050 [mailto:richardh@j...] > Sent: sábado, 7 de agosto de 2004 20:48 > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Announcement: QuadToneRIP for Windows XP > > > Hi Nelson, > > I'd be happy to share, but must say I did nothing whatsoever besides install > and print. I used the defaults exactly as they are in the files Roy provided > without changing even a line of text: > > 1. Letter size EEM (or EAM, depending on your geography) > > 2. Image size was 5X5 at 360 ppi (a low-key, studio portrait of an infant > with very smooth and subtle tonal transitions) > > 3. Image in RGB mode, 8 bit, desaturated using modified c/m technique > > Since my first post I have also made a couple of more prints using the same > settings, included some high-key images and enjoyed the same fine results. I > haven't even started to tweak anything because I'm having too much fun! > > Hope this helps, but Roy has already done all the work ;>) > > Kind regards, > Richard > > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Nelson Ricciardi" > <nelson_@r...> wrote: > > Richard > > > > Could you please share with us > > > > paper size > > file size (inches) > > dpi > > > > that you´re using? > > > > Thank you > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, > "richard_h95050" > > <richardh@j...> wrote: > > > Hi Roy, > > > > > > Just wanted to let you know that I downloaded and installed your > > > QTR/XP files onto one of my Win2K machines, followed the very > simple > > > direcions you've provided and made my first print in less than 5 > > > minutes. > > > > > > Excellent. You're the best! > > > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Roy > > Harrington" > > > <roy@h...> wrote: > > > > > > > > I've just uploaded the first release of QuadToneRIP for the PC. > > > > The initial version supports the 2200 with UltraChrome Inks. > > > > > > > > Other printers and canned profiles will be available fairly > soon. > > > > Support for creating your own profiles is not available yet. > > > > > > > > Roy > > > > www.harrington.com > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. Yahoo! Groups Links
2004-08-08 by richard_h95050
Hi Nelson, Good observations all the way around, and some very interesting points. I'm sure we'll learn more about this question and QTR going forward, and it appears from his latest Website update that Roy is already looking at the 720 ppi question. I appreciate the very nice exchange of perspectives -- thank you! Kind regards, Richard --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Nelson Ricciardi" <nelson_@r...> wrote: > Richard, > > What you say is correct. For most uses, 360 ppi is just perfect. > > Anyway, I was told that the native resolution of the 2100/2200 is 720 ppi. > And for the 7600/9600, the native res is 360 ppi. > > I´m just trying to get the best quality I can out of my printer> I always > believed that the right way to do was to send the file in the final res, > ready to print. > > Michael Tapes, designer of Qimage, belongs to the group of people that > believe the best approach is to send the file in the native resolution. That > is the only reason I use this approach. > > I never did any test myself. I was just following a recipe that seems to > work fine. > > But your points are all valid. > > Again, thank you for your input. > > Nelson > > -----Original Message----- > From: richard_h95050 [mailto:richardh@j...] > Sent: sábado, 7 de agosto de 2004 22:04 > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Announcement: QuadToneRIP for Windows XP > > > Hi Nelson, > > I just ran an 8X10 @ 360 ppi, and the tonal transitions are still "smooth as > a baby's bottom" -- I guess I can safely say that because the print is a > studio shot of a newborn and mother, and that's the main subject matter ;>) > > Don't know what would happen over 8X10 or at 720 ppi, but since my machine > has a stack of letter-size EEM in it, that's what I'm playing with. The only > other question I have is regarding the need for the 720 ppi setting, and > it's purely a theoretical question: > > I haven't tested 720 PPI with QTR to see if it causes any problems for me, > but I also haven't found any reason to go to the higher res for my own work > (admittedly a subjective choice). I'm also running other RIPs; Imageprint on > my 9600, PiezoBW/Pro or Imageprint/Quad drivers on my 7000 and Paul Roark's > UT-2 (both EZ and w/curves) on my 1280. All are fed at 360 ppi, and the > output pleases my eye. > > John Cone used to suggest pushing as much resolution down the pipe as > possible, but others present some interesting counterpoints about just how > much of that information actually impacts the print, depending on how the > RIP and/or driver handles the data, etc. -- and they're all a bit different. > Roy would be able to answer that for us about QTR, I'm sure, and you as an > artist are the best judge of your own results. > > Speaking subjectively, I've can't pragmatically differentiate between prints > made using the additional ppi, and some of the RIP makers even suggest > letting their software do the work and not adding to the file size > unnecessarily. However, those are some of the ongoing technical > conversations that cycle continuously through the forums, and I'm not trying > to rekindle that flame (pun intended). The bottom line to me is > -- "be happy, make your clients happy and make beautiful prints". > > Hope you get everything tweaked to meet your own personal workflow. It would > be interesting to know if the difference in ppi is really evident in your > prints -- I'm always interesting in taking a second look at things and > questioning my own assumptions... ;>) > > Most of all, thanks to Roy for all his hard work, endless generousity, and > giving us all an exciting reason to be even having these dialogs! > > Kind regards, > Richard > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Nelson Ricciardi" > <nelson_@r...> wrote: > > Thank you Richard > > > > I´m also having fun printing images smaller than 8x10 in 360 ppi. > > > > I´ll try a 5x5 using 720 ppi to see if it works. 8.5x11 in 720 > ppi > does not > > work for sure. > > > > Again, thanks a lot. > > > > Nelson > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: richard_h95050 [mailto:richardh@j...] > > Sent: sábado, 7 de agosto de 2004 20:48 > > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Announcement: QuadToneRIP for Windows XP > > > > > > Hi Nelson, > > > > I'd be happy to share, but must say I did nothing whatsoever besides > install > > and print. I used the defaults exactly as they are in the files Roy > provided > > without changing even a line of text: > > > > 1. Letter size EEM (or EAM, depending on your geography) > > > > 2. Image size was 5X5 at 360 ppi (a low-key, studio portrait of an > infant > > with very smooth and subtle tonal transitions) > > > > 3. Image in RGB mode, 8 bit, desaturated using modified c/m > technique > > > > Since my first post I have also made a couple of more prints using > the same > > settings, included some high-key images and enjoyed the same fine > results. I > > haven't even started to tweak anything because I'm having too much > fun! > > > > Hope this helps, but Roy has already done all the work ;>) > > > > Kind regards, > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Nelson > Ricciardi" > > <nelson_@r...> wrote: > > > Richard > > > > > > Could you please share with us > > > > > > paper size > > > file size (inches) > > > dpi > > > > > > that you´re using? > > > > > > Thank you > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, > > "richard_h95050" > > > <richardh@j...> wrote: > > > > Hi Roy, > > > > > > > > Just wanted to let you know that I downloaded and installed > your > > > > QTR/XP files onto one of my Win2K machines, followed the very > > simple > > > > direcions you've provided and made my first print in less than > 5 > > > > minutes. > > > > > > > > Excellent. You're the best! > > > > > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Roy > > > Harrington" > > > > <roy@h...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I've just uploaded the first release of QuadToneRIP for the > PC. > > > > > The initial version supports the 2200 with UltraChrome Inks. > > > > > > > > > > Other printers and canned profiles will be available fairly > > soon. > > > > > Support for creating your own profiles is not available yet. > > > > > > > > > > Roy > > > > > www.harrington.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as > they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same > page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the > membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from > the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and > Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU > FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY > DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, > GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE "OWNER" AND > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE > POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY > TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR > ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY > THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER
> MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links
2004-08-08 by Daniel Staver
Nelson, I remember doing several tests early last year printing the same file at 360ppi and 720ppi. While I could distinguish some differences in microfine details when using a loupe there was no way I could see any difference at any reasonable viewing distances. After that I decided to just scale all my files to 360ppi at print time and not worry about it. -- Daniel Staver http://daniel.staver.no Nelson Ricciardi wrote:
> Richard, > > What you say is correct. For most uses, 360 ppi is just perfect. > > Anyway, I was told that the native resolution of the 2100/2200 is 720 ppi. > And for the 7600/9600, the native res is 360 ppi. > > I\ufffdm just trying to get the best quality I can out of my printer> I always > believed that the right way to do was to send the file in the final res, > ready to print. > > Michael Tapes, designer of Qimage, belongs to the group of people that > believe the best approach is to send the file in the native resolution. That > is the only reason I use this approach. > > I never did any test myself. I was just following a recipe that seems to > work fine. > > But your points are all valid. > > Again, thank you for your input.
2004-08-08 by Roy Harrington
I pretty much agree that you probably hard pressed to see the difference of 360ppi versus 720ppi or more. But its probably image dependent and viewer dependent. My usually method is to just print at whatever I have unless its drastically too high or too low. I've done a little checking of the code and I'll probably be able to fix it= so it'll most likely be a moot point. But I'm a little surprised that exactly 720 doesn't work. It is possible t= hat you are slightly over like 720.10? Roy --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Nelson Ricciardi" <nelson_@r...> wrote: > Richard, > > What you say is correct. For most uses, 360 ppi is just perfect. > > Anyway, I was told that the native resolution of the 2100/2200 is 720 ppi= . > And for the 7600/9600, the native res is 360 ppi. > > I´m just trying to get the best quality I can out of my printer> I always= > believed that the right way to do was to send the file in the final res, > ready to print. > > Michael Tapes, designer of Qimage, belongs to the group of people that > believe the best approach is to send the file in the native resolution. T= hat > is the only reason I use this approach. > > I never did any test myself. I was just following a recipe that seems to > work fine. > > But your points are all valid. > > Again, thank you for your input. > > Nelson > > -----Original Message----- > From: richard_h95050 [mailto:richardh@j...] > Sent: sábado, 7 de agosto de 2004 22:04 > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Announcement: QuadToneRIP for Windows XP > > > Hi Nelson, > > I just ran an 8X10 @ 360 ppi, and the tonal transitions are still "smooth= as > a baby's bottom" -- I guess I can safely say that because the print is a > studio shot of a newborn and mother, and that's the main subject matter ;= >) > > Don't know what would happen over 8X10 or at 720 ppi, but since my machin= e > has a stack of letter-size EEM in it, that's what I'm playing with. The o= nly > other question I have is regarding the need for the 720 ppi setting, and > it's purely a theoretical question: > > I haven't tested 720 PPI with QTR to see if it causes any problems for me= , > but I also haven't found any reason to go to the higher res for my own wo= rk > (admittedly a subjective choice). I'm also running other RIPs; Imageprint= on > my 9600, PiezoBW/Pro or Imageprint/Quad drivers on my 7000 and Paul Roark= 's > UT-2 (both EZ and w/curves) on my 1280. All are fed at 360 ppi, and the > output pleases my eye. > > John Cone used to suggest pushing as much resolution down the pipe as > possible, but others present some interesting counterpoints about just ho= w > much of that information actually impacts the print, depending on how the= > RIP and/or driver handles the data, etc. -- and they're all a bit differe= nt. > Roy would be able to answer that for us about QTR, I'm sure, and you as a= n > artist are the best judge of your own results. > > Speaking subjectively, I've can't pragmatically differentiate between pri= nts > made using the additional ppi, and some of the RIP makers even suggest > letting their software do the work and not adding to the file size > unnecessarily. However, those are some of the ongoing technical > conversations that cycle continuously through the forums, and I'm not try= ing > to rekindle that flame (pun intended). The bottom line to me is > -- "be happy, make your clients happy and make beautiful prints". > > Hope you get everything tweaked to meet your own personal workflow. It wo= uld > be interesting to know if the difference in ppi is really evident in your= > prints -- I'm always interesting in taking a second look at things and > questioning my own assumptions... ;>) > > Most of all, thanks to Roy for all his hard work, endless generousity, an= d
> giving us all an exciting reason to be even having these dialogs! > > Kind regards, > Richard > >
2004-08-08 by Nelson Ricciardi
Roy Thank you for your support. I'm sure that I'm doing 720 dpi. Let me tell you my workflow. I use an Epson 2200, Enhanced Matte and letter size paper. (1) I load a 16 bit color picture on Photoshop. Convert it to B&H using the Channel Mixer and save the file again still as a 16 bitt TIFF file. I usually do not convert to grayscale and would like to know it that's mandatory with QTR. (2) Load Qimage, place the file on the page, make annotations and frames, and print the picture to a file. That creates a new TIFF file for me. When I print to a file I can specify the dpi and the size. I'm testing only 360 and 720. Will try 540 ppi and see what happens. (3) I usually dont do this for color work, but now that's I'm trying QTR I open the NEW tiff file in Phothosop to see if everything is ok. And the program show me the size and ppi information correct. Problems I've found: A - I can't send a picture larger than the letter size paper can handle. The RIP can't resize the picture to the maximum size allowed. The RIP has the information of the paper size I'm using. It should be able to tell me "my friend, you're trying to print something that is too big" or, at least, resize the picture for me. B - I can't send a picture with 8.5x11 inches to the printer. I have to consider the margin in my calculations. Something like 1/8 of an inch on each side. I guess A and B are the same problem. C - I can't print 8x10 with 720 ppi. Other were able to print it, but I'd like to know it they were using letter size paper. D - I CAN print 8x10 with 360 ppi just fine. I'll try 7x9 720 dpi next and see if it goes. Again, thank you for your support and congratulations. Nelson
> -----Original Message----- > From: Roy Harrington [mailto:roy@...] > Sent: sábado, 7 de agosto de 2004 23:27 > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Digital BW] PPI for QuadToneRIP for Windows XP > > > > I pretty much agree that you probably hard pressed to see the > difference > of 360ppi versus 720ppi or more. But its probably image dependent and > viewer dependent. My usually method is to just print at > whatever I have > unless its drastically too high or too low. > > I've done a little checking of the code and I'll probably be > able to fix it= > > so > it'll most likely be a moot point. > But I'm a little surprised that exactly 720 doesn't work. It > is possible t= > > hat > you are slightly over like 720.10? > > Roy > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Nelson > Ricciardi" > <nelson_@r...> wrote: > > Richard, > > > > What you say is correct. For most uses, 360 ppi is just perfect. > > > > Anyway, I was told that the native resolution of the > 2100/2200 is 720 ppi= > > .. > > And for the 7600/9600, the native res is 360 ppi. > > > > I´m just trying to get the best quality I can out of my > printer> I always= > > > > believed that the right way to do was to send the file in > the final res, > > ready to print. > > > > Michael Tapes, designer of Qimage, belongs to the group of > people that > > believe the best approach is to send the file in the native > resolution. T= > > hat > > is the only reason I use this approach. > > > > I never did any test myself. I was just following a recipe > that seems to > > work fine. > > > > But your points are all valid. > > > > Again, thank you for your input. > > > > Nelson > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: richard_h95050 [mailto:richardh@j...] > > Sent: sábado, 7 de agosto de 2004 22:04 > > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Announcement: QuadToneRIP for Windows XP > > > > > > Hi Nelson, > > > > I just ran an 8X10 @ 360 ppi, and the tonal transitions are > still "smooth= > > as > > a baby's bottom" -- I guess I can safely say that because > the print is a > > studio shot of a newborn and mother, and that's the main > subject matter ;= > > >) > > > > Don't know what would happen over 8X10 or at 720 ppi, but > since my machin= > > e > > has a stack of letter-size EEM in it, that's what I'm > playing with. The o= > > nly > > other question I have is regarding the need for the 720 ppi > setting, and > > it's purely a theoretical question: > > > > I haven't tested 720 PPI with QTR to see if it causes any > problems for me= > > , > > but I also haven't found any reason to go to the higher res > for my own wo= > > rk > > (admittedly a subjective choice). I'm also running other > RIPs; Imageprint= > > on > > my 9600, PiezoBW/Pro or Imageprint/Quad drivers on my 7000 > and Paul Roark= > > 's > > UT-2 (both EZ and w/curves) on my 1280. All are fed at 360 > ppi, and the > > output pleases my eye. > > > > John Cone used to suggest pushing as much resolution down > the pipe as > > possible, but others present some interesting counterpoints > about just ho= > > w > > much of that information actually impacts the print, > depending on how the= > > > > RIP and/or driver handles the data, etc. -- and they're all > a bit differe= > > nt. > > Roy would be able to answer that for us about QTR, I'm > sure, and you as a= > > n > > artist are the best judge of your own results. > > > > Speaking subjectively, I've can't pragmatically > differentiate between pri= > > nts > > made using the additional ppi, and some of the RIP makers > even suggest > > letting their software do the work and not adding to the file size > > unnecessarily. However, those are some of the ongoing technical > > conversations that cycle continuously through the forums, > and I'm not try= > > ing > > to rekindle that flame (pun intended). The bottom line to me is > > -- "be happy, make your clients happy and make beautiful prints". > > > > Hope you get everything tweaked to meet your own personal > workflow. It wo= > > uld > > be interesting to know if the difference in ppi is really > evident in your= > > > > prints -- I'm always interesting in taking a second look at > things and > > questioning my own assumptions... ;>) > > > > Most of all, thanks to Roy for all his hard work, endless > generousity, an= > > d > > giving us all an exciting reason to be even having these dialogs! > > > > Kind regards, > > Richard > > > > > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > --------------------~--> > Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70 > http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/ucIolB/TM > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ------~-> > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other > resources as they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or > you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership > preferences by visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier > messages to keep them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks > or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be > removed from the membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of > digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic > posts may be removed from the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group > rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and > decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See Group > Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL > BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE > THAT THE OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, > INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY > DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF > PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN > IF THE OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH > DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE > THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED > ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) > STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, > THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO > THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > >