Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Moab Kayenta: any numbers available?

Moab Kayenta: any numbers available?

2005-08-17 by Steven Karafyllakis

Hello Moab fans,

I know this has been asked before, but I don't remember the answer-are 
there any fade-test numvers available for this paper? Or any of their 
papers?

Thanks

Steve Karafyllakis

Re: [Digital BW] Moab Kayenta: any numbers available?

2005-08-18 by James Irelan

On Aug 17, 2005, at 4:54 PM, Steven Karafyllakis wrote:

> Hello Moab fans,
>
> I know this has been asked before, but I don't remember the answer-are
> there any fade-test numvers available for this paper? Or any of their
> papers?
>
> Thanks
>
> Steve Karafyllakis
>
>

I can tell you that Entrada printed with Lyson Fotonics fades after  
several months to maybe a year, max.  I printed a series of art  
posters for a friend, with the admonition that she put them behind  
glass.  For the folk-art look of them, however, she declined, and  
hung them without glass on her wall, no direct sunlight.  They are  
quite noticeably faded now.  I believe this to be much more a  
function of the dye ink, though,  than the paper itself.  I have some  
other prints out open printed with UCs on various matte art papers  
that still look fine after a few years.

James

Re: [Digital BW] Moab Kayenta: any numbers available?

2005-08-18 by Steven Karafyllakis

Thanks, James- I agree it was most likely the dye inks causing the 
rapid fade. Is Entrada a cotton paper? I know Kayenta is Alpha-
cellulose, I'm just wondering if it is more reliable than EEM as a 
cheap proofing paper. It would be nice to have something you could 
keep or give away without worrying about it turning yellow  down the 
road.

Steve Karafyllakis

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, James Irelan 
<james@r...> wrote:
> 
> On Aug 17, 2005, at 4:54 PM, Steven Karafyllakis wrote:
> 
> > Hello Moab fans,
> >
> > I know this has been asked before, but I don't remember the 
answer-are
> > there any fade-test numvers available for this paper? Or any of 
their
> > papers?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Steve Karafyllakis
> >
> >
> 
> I can tell you that Entrada printed with Lyson Fotonics fades 
after  
> several months to maybe a year, max.  I printed a series of art  
> posters for a friend, with the admonition that she put them 
behind  
> glass.  For the folk-art look of them, however, she declined, and  
> hung them without glass on her wall, no direct sunlight.  They 
are  
> quite noticeably faded now.  I believe this to be much more a  
> function of the dye ink, though,  than the paper itself.  I have 
some  
> other prints out open printed with UCs on various matte art 
papers  
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> that still look fine after a few years.
> 
> James

Re: [Digital BW] Moab Kayenta: any numbers available?

2005-08-18 by Clayton Jones

Steve,

>Is Entrada a cotton paper?

Yes, but it flakes terribly.

 I know Kayenta is Alpha-
> cellulose, I'm just wondering if it is more reliable than EEM as a 
> cheap proofing paper. It would be nice to have something you could 
> keep or give away without worrying about it turning yellow  down
the 
> road.

Moab says it's acid/lignen free so it's probably fine.


Regards,
Clayton


Info on black and white digital printing at    
http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm

Re: [Digital BW] Moab Kayenta: any numbers available?

2005-08-18 by James Irelan

It sounds like Clayton has had more problems with flaking on Entrada  
than I have.  I have had some.  I stopped using my favorite paper,  
Torchon, or Riviera (Mediastreet) because of the flaking problem,  
which I still believe is not true flaking, but rather a situation  
where the ink separates like a bubble popping, leaving a spot.  I  
have never seen an actual physical flake, and I've looked very  
carefully.  I routinely brush off my papers before printing with a  
drafting brush.  I'd go back to Riviera immediately if the "flaking"  
problem were solved.

James

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.