Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Good Old Epson 3000

Good Old Epson 3000

2005-12-11 by Vladimir Kabelik

Hi guys,

I haven't been in touch for some time but I always enjoy reading your
exchanges.  

I work mostly in BW, still using the original Cone's Piezography
system on my good old Epson 3000.  I now buy the Sundance inks
directly from BWGUYS.COM.  They still work like charm on all
Hahnemuehle papers and their new spooler is more reliable than before. 

Recently, I had to replace all four heads on my E3000.  I paid $600
(ouch!) but the printer runs like a Swiss watch again.  I wonder how
many of these "old workhorses" are still around and how many of you
are still in quad tone BW printing.  

I hear all the wonderful stuff about ImagePrint and Epson 4800 and
wonder how much has the technology progressed – or not, because I'm
still pretty happy with my results.

For comparison, please check Lenswork magazine, issue #59 with some of
my older photographs.

All the best,

Vlad Kabelik

Re: Good Old Epson 3000

2005-12-13 by fotojali

I just got my old 3000's print head unclogged after it's been sitting
still for 2 years :-) I have printed only color before, but am waitig
for my first mono ink order from MIS. Trying to get the "old
workhorse" going again...

- fotojali

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Vladimir
Kabelik" <artcoreproductions@s...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Hi guys,
> 
> I haven't been in touch for some time but I always enjoy reading your
> exchanges.  
> 
> I work mostly in BW, still using the original Cone's Piezography
> system on my good old Epson 3000.  I now buy the Sundance inks
> directly from BWGUYS.COM.  They still work like charm on all
> Hahnemuehle papers and their new spooler is more reliable than before. 
> 
> Recently, I had to replace all four heads on my E3000.  I paid $600
> (ouch!) but the printer runs like a Swiss watch again.  I wonder how
> many of these "old workhorses" are still around and how many of you
> are still in quad tone BW printing.  
> 
> I hear all the wonderful stuff about ImagePrint and Epson 4800 and
> wonder how much has the technology progressed – or not, because I'm
> still pretty happy with my results.
> 
> For comparison, please check Lenswork magazine, issue #59 with some of
> my older photographs.
> 
> All the best,
> 
> Vlad Kabelik
>

Re: Good Old Epson 3000

2005-12-16 by Vladimir Kabelik

Good for you, this printer can still work miracles!



--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "fotojali"
<jporkkala@y...> wrote:
>
> I just got my old 3000's print head unclogged after it's been sitting
> still for 2 years :-) I have printed only color before, but am waitig
> for my first mono ink order from MIS. Trying to get the "old
> workhorse" going again...
> 
> - fotojali
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Vladimir
> Kabelik" <artcoreproductions@s...> wrote:
> >
> > Hi guys,
> > 
> > I haven't been in touch for some time but I always enjoy reading your
> > exchanges.  
> > 
> > I work mostly in BW, still using the original Cone's Piezography
> > system on my good old Epson 3000.  I now buy the Sundance inks
> > directly from BWGUYS.COM.  They still work like charm on all
> > Hahnemuehle papers and their new spooler is more reliable than
before. 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > 
> > Recently, I had to replace all four heads on my E3000.  I paid $600
> > (ouch!) but the printer runs like a Swiss watch again.  I wonder how
> > many of these "old workhorses" are still around and how many of you
> > are still in quad tone BW printing.  
> > 
> > I hear all the wonderful stuff about ImagePrint and Epson 4800 and
> > wonder how much has the technology progressed – or not, because I'm
> > still pretty happy with my results.
> > 
> > For comparison, please check Lenswork magazine, issue #59 with some of
> > my older photographs.
> > 
> > All the best,
> > 
> > Vlad Kabelik
> >
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.