Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Negative scanning workflow: Nikon Coolscan

Negative scanning workflow: Nikon Coolscan

2005-12-23 by garethjolly

Glad everyone is having fun with the Farm Security Administration -
have to say I was blown with the quality of the print of the Migrant
Mother I was able to get.

I think I'm getting on top of my B&W print workflow.

I'm now starting to look at the scanner end of things.

I have a Nikon 4000ED with roll film adapter - and I have both Nikon
Scan and Vuescan.

There seem to be 2 problems with the Nikon / Nikon scan.  The first is
that Nikon scan insists truncating the histogram - starting from 30 in
the shadows - on negative scans.  The second is focus can be a little
out - due to a combination of limited depth of field, slight curvature
of the negative in the glassless holder and possibly autofocus
problems on some images. (I flippantly remarked on my old LS20
producing sharper scans than my 4000 and someone pointed this out)

I'm also a little unsure of the analogue gain function - there seems
to be some suggestion it doesn't affect the lamp brightness in B&W,
simply operating on the post processed image.

The type of workflow I was thinking of is this:

- use Nikonscan rather than Vuescan
- scan B&W negatives as a 16 bit colour positive;
- preview the negative
- make slight adjustments to analogue gain if the negative appears
over or underexposed (i.e significant clipping or bunching up of values)
- use manual focus to focus at the centre of the image
- use GEM to reduce grain (taking up Paul's suggestion)
- use multiscan as and when required (especially archival images and
images with problems with shadow definition)
- possibly, use multiple scans with different GEM and analogue gain
settings
- convert to B&W in Photoshop - using the colour combiner.

I've also ordered an Anti-Newton ring glass carrier insert for my film
strip holder.

Can anyone help me here?  Is there anything I should be doing
differently?  This is largely guesswork based on reading a few things.

And does anyone think I should be using Vuescan instead?  The big
advantage to Nikonscan seems to be GEM.  And I might need to calibrate
the Coolscan to get the best out of Vuescan - meaning I need at IT8
target!  Don't suppose anyone has an ICC for Coolscan 4000ED?

Not quite sure how I combine the multiple images.  I have Photoshop
CS2.  Paul mentioned the cloning tool...  Paul, do you have open
multiple images and clone between them?  Or am I just totally missing
the point.

Thanks
Gareth

Re: Negative scanning workflow: Nikon Coolscan

2005-12-23 by helen_bach2003

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "garethjolly"
<garethjolly@b...> wrote:

Gareth,

If I scan a negative as a positive in Nikonscan to get round the
clipping problem, I invert in Nikonscan using the RGB (or greyscale)
curve - ie I make the curve go from top left to bottom right.

Best,
Helen

Re: Negative scanning workflow: Nikon Coolscan

2005-12-23 by wwodets

Gareth-

I use essentially the approach you suggest on a 5000, with a few 
differences.

I scan a grayscale positive; I use the analogue gain to more-or-less 
center the data in the histogram (especially important with dense 
negatives); I adjust the histogram sliders in but only loosely; and I 
always scan 8X to reduce noise (the scanner-induced noise is random, 
so the multiscanning averages out everything that is not consistent 
in all eight scans, which is the noise); then I spend two hours 
spotting the image in PS!  Also, use 16 bit, which I think you didn't 
mention.

What you get is a light, flat image that includes all the data from 
the negative.

Walt




--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "garethjolly" 
<garethjolly@b...> wrote:
>
> Glad everyone is having fun with the Farm Security Administration -
> have to say I was blown with the quality of the print of the Migrant
> Mother I was able to get.
> 
> I think I'm getting on top of my B&W print workflow.
> 
> I'm now starting to look at the scanner end of things.
> 
> I have a Nikon 4000ED with roll film adapter - and I have both Nikon
> Scan and Vuescan.
> 
> There seem to be 2 problems with the Nikon / Nikon scan.  The first 
is
> that Nikon scan insists truncating the histogram - starting from 30 
in
> the shadows - on negative scans.  The second is focus can be a 
little
> out - due to a combination of limited depth of field, slight 
curvature
> of the negative in the glassless holder and possibly autofocus
> problems on some images. (I flippantly remarked on my old LS20
> producing sharper scans than my 4000 and someone pointed this out)
> 
> I'm also a little unsure of the analogue gain function - there seems
> to be some suggestion it doesn't affect the lamp brightness in B&W,
> simply operating on the post processed image.
> 
> The type of workflow I was thinking of is this:
> 
> - use Nikonscan rather than Vuescan
> - scan B&W negatives as a 16 bit colour positive;
> - preview the negative
> - make slight adjustments to analogue gain if the negative appears
> over or underexposed (i.e significant clipping or bunching up of 
values)
> - use manual focus to focus at the centre of the image
> - use GEM to reduce grain (taking up Paul's suggestion)
> - use multiscan as and when required (especially archival images and
> images with problems with shadow definition)
> - possibly, use multiple scans with different GEM and analogue gain
> settings
> - convert to B&W in Photoshop - using the colour combiner.
> 
> I've also ordered an Anti-Newton ring glass carrier insert for my 
film
> strip holder.
> 
> Can anyone help me here?  Is there anything I should be doing
> differently?  This is largely guesswork based on reading a few 
things.
> 
> And does anyone think I should be using Vuescan instead?  The big
> advantage to Nikonscan seems to be GEM.  And I might need to 
calibrate
> the Coolscan to get the best out of Vuescan - meaning I need at IT8
> target!  Don't suppose anyone has an ICC for Coolscan 4000ED?
> 
> Not quite sure how I combine the multiple images.  I have Photoshop
> CS2.  Paul mentioned the cloning tool...  Paul, do you have open
> multiple images and clone between them?  Or am I just totally 
missing
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> the point.
> 
> Thanks
> Gareth
>

Looking for an inexpensive natural paper

2005-12-23 by Arthur Fink

I'm looking for an inexpensive natural color paper (not bright white) 
to use for greeting cards.

InkJetArt's Illuminata cotton is the best I've found (like Moab 
Entrada, only cheaper), but I'd like to find something even less 
expensive than that.

Any ideas?

Arthur Fink

	A r t h u r    F i n k    P h o t o g r a p h y
	-----------------------------------------------
	Ten New Island Avenue         land 207.766.5722
	Peaks Island, Maine 04108     cell 207.615.5722
	www.arthurfinkphoto.com  af@...

	 Photographing people, places, objects, events

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Negative scanning workflow: Nikon Coolscan

2005-12-23 by Joe Dempsey

For what it's worth, here's a technique I use with a plethora of 
color 35mm negs I have with a Nikon 4000 ED. Scan at 4000 dpi 16 bit 
color at 100% with digital ice enabled at full tilt which on a full 
frame 35mm neg nets about 88 mgb.  This will not set any new indoor 
records for speedy scanning.

Then, I tried a a different BW conversion technique (to me) with good 
results. Open the tif from the scanner and save as a psd. Add a 
hue/saturation adjustment layer and set the blending mode to color. 
Duplicate the adjustment layer.  Click on the top adjustment layer 
and move the saturation slider all the way to the left to desaturate. 
Then adjust the hue on the original (this was the way the article 
said to do it), but I like adjusting the individual rgb levels 
channels until I get what I want and sometimes mess with the original 
r,g or b curves as well.  Then do whatever spotting is left that 
digital ice did not get plus any other tweaks that are required to 
achieve what I want.

Then save a copy. Then go to image size and set the resolution to 360 
without resampling which yields something in the neighborhood of 
12-13" inches on the tall side. Then, if I want a larger print, 
resample bicubic sharper to the size I want and save a copy. Then if 
there is a noise issue, apply a light Neat Image treatment and save a 
copy. Then sharpen as necessary and save a copy. Then save as grayscale.

It's a tedious process, but you can go back to any stage and start 
over if you don't get what you want. I have gotten 16" inch prints 
from 35mm negs this way with excellent results. I rely on a friend 
whose printer is much better than mine to do the prints.

My machine is P4/3.6, 2 gb ram with a dedicated 15,000  rpm scuzzy 
scratch disk.

That's my story and I'm stickin' to it.
Joe


At 11:10 AM 12/23/2005, you wrote:
>Gareth-
>
>I use essentially the approach you suggest on a 5000, with a few
>differences.
>
>I scan a grayscale positive; I use the analogue gain to more-or-less
>center the data in the histogram (especially important with dense
>negatives); I adjust the histogram sliders in but only loosely; and I
>always scan 8X to reduce noise (the scanner-induced noise is random,
>so the multiscanning averages out everything that is not consistent
>in all eight scans, which is the noise); then I spend two hours
>spotting the image in PS!  Also, use 16 bit, which I think you didn't
>mention.
>
>What you get is a light, flat image that includes all the data from
>the negative.
>
>Walt
>
>
>
>
>--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "garethjolly"
><garethjolly@b...> wrote:
> >
> > Glad everyone is having fun with the Farm Security Administration -
> > have to say I was blown with the quality of the print of the Migrant
> > Mother I was able to get.
> >
> > I think I'm getting on top of my B&W print workflow.
> >
> > I'm now starting to look at the scanner end of things.
> >
> > I have a Nikon 4000ED with roll film adapter - and I have both Nikon
> > Scan and Vuescan.
> >
> > There seem to be 2 problems with the Nikon / Nikon scan.  The first
>is
> > that Nikon scan insists truncating the histogram - starting from 30
>in
> > the shadows - on negative scans.  The second is focus can be a
>little
> > out - due to a combination of limited depth of field, slight
>curvature
> > of the negative in the glassless holder and possibly autofocus
> > problems on some images. (I flippantly remarked on my old LS20
> > producing sharper scans than my 4000 and someone pointed this out)
> >
> > I'm also a little unsure of the analogue gain function - there seems
> > to be some suggestion it doesn't affect the lamp brightness in B&W,
> > simply operating on the post processed image.
> >
> > The type of workflow I was thinking of is this:
> >
> > - use Nikonscan rather than Vuescan
> > - scan B&W negatives as a 16 bit colour positive;
> > - preview the negative
> > - make slight adjustments to analogue gain if the negative appears
> > over or underexposed (i.e significant clipping or bunching up of
>values)
> > - use manual focus to focus at the centre of the image
> > - use GEM to reduce grain (taking up Paul's suggestion)
> > - use multiscan as and when required (especially archival images and
> > images with problems with shadow definition)
> > - possibly, use multiple scans with different GEM and analogue gain
> > settings
> > - convert to B&W in Photoshop - using the colour combiner.
> >
> > I've also ordered an Anti-Newton ring glass carrier insert for my
>film
> > strip holder.
> >
> > Can anyone help me here?  Is there anything I should be doing
> > differently?  This is largely guesswork based on reading a few
>things.
> >
> > And does anyone think I should be using Vuescan instead?  The big
> > advantage to Nikonscan seems to be GEM.  And I might need to
>calibrate
> > the Coolscan to get the best out of Vuescan - meaning I need at IT8
> > target!  Don't suppose anyone has an ICC for Coolscan 4000ED?
> >
> > Not quite sure how I combine the multiple images.  I have Photoshop
> > CS2.  Paul mentioned the cloning tool...  Paul, do you have open
> > multiple images and clone between them?  Or am I just totally
>missing
> > the point.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Gareth
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other 
>resources as they are often being updated.
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
>If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish 
>to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting 
>this same page.
>
>Please follow these basic guidelines:
>- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages 
>to keep them short.
>- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
>flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed 
>from the membership without notice.
>- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital 
>B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be 
>removed from the membership.
>- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and 
>guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group 
>Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the 
>Files section:
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
>
>BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE 
>PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE 
>"OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL 
>NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, 
>CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, 
>DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE 
>LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE 
>PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH 
>DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE 
>DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR 
>ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR 
>CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; 
>OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Joe Dempsey Communications Co.
Office / Home 870.534.5835
Office Downtown 870.536.5758
Cell 870.550.0190
http://www.joedempseycommunications.com

[Digital BW] Re: Negative scanning workflow: Nikon Coolscan

2005-12-23 by Stephen Kobrin

Joe,

At least on my computer you cannot set the mode of both adjustment 
layers to color, only the lower one where you actually use the hue 
slider.  

Steve

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Joe Dempsey 
<jdempsey@c...> wrote:
>
> For what it's worth, here's a technique I use with a plethora of 
> color 35mm negs I have with a Nikon 4000 ED. Scan at 4000 dpi 16 
bit 
> color at 100% with digital ice enabled at full tilt which on a full 
> frame 35mm neg nets about 88 mgb.  This will not set any new indoor 
> records for speedy scanning.
> 
> Then, I tried a a different BW conversion technique (to me) with 
good 
> results. Open the tif from the scanner and save as a psd. Add a 
> hue/saturation adjustment layer and set the blending mode to color. 
> Duplicate the adjustment layer.  Click on the top adjustment layer 
> and move the saturation slider all the way to the left to 
desaturate. 
> Then adjust the hue on the original (this was the way the article 
> said to do it), but I like adjusting the individual rgb levels 
> channels until I get what I want and sometimes mess with the 
original 
> r,g or b curves as well.  Then do whatever spotting is left that 
> digital ice did not get plus any other tweaks that are required to 
> achieve what I want.
> 
> Then save a copy. Then go to image size and set the resolution to 
360 
> without resampling which yields something in the neighborhood of 
> 12-13" inches on the tall side. Then, if I want a larger print, 
> resample bicubic sharper to the size I want and save a copy. Then 
if 
> there is a noise issue, apply a light Neat Image treatment and save 
a 
> copy. Then sharpen as necessary and save a copy. Then save as 
grayscale.
> 
> It's a tedious process, but you can go back to any stage and start 
> over if you don't get what you want. I have gotten 16" inch prints 
> from 35mm negs this way with excellent results. I rely on a friend 
> whose printer is much better than mine to do the prints.
> 
> My machine is P4/3.6, 2 gb ram with a dedicated 15,000  rpm scuzzy 
> scratch disk.
> 
> That's my story and I'm stickin' to it.
> Joe
> 
> 
> At 11:10 AM 12/23/2005, you wrote:
> >Gareth-
> >
> >I use essentially the approach you suggest on a 5000, with a few
> >differences.
> >
> >I scan a grayscale positive; I use the analogue gain to more-or-
less
> >center the data in the histogram (especially important with dense
> >negatives); I adjust the histogram sliders in but only loosely; 
and I
> >always scan 8X to reduce noise (the scanner-induced noise is 
random,
> >so the multiscanning averages out everything that is not consistent
> >in all eight scans, which is the noise); then I spend two hours
> >spotting the image in PS!  Also, use 16 bit, which I think you 
didn't
> >mention.
> >
> >What you get is a light, flat image that includes all the data from
> >the negative.
> >
> >Walt
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "garethjolly"
> ><garethjolly@b...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Glad everyone is having fun with the Farm Security 
Administration -
> > > have to say I was blown with the quality of the print of the 
Migrant
> > > Mother I was able to get.
> > >
> > > I think I'm getting on top of my B&W print workflow.
> > >
> > > I'm now starting to look at the scanner end of things.
> > >
> > > I have a Nikon 4000ED with roll film adapter - and I have both 
Nikon
> > > Scan and Vuescan.
> > >
> > > There seem to be 2 problems with the Nikon / Nikon scan.  The 
first
> >is
> > > that Nikon scan insists truncating the histogram - starting 
from 30
> >in
> > > the shadows - on negative scans.  The second is focus can be a
> >little
> > > out - due to a combination of limited depth of field, slight
> >curvature
> > > of the negative in the glassless holder and possibly autofocus
> > > problems on some images. (I flippantly remarked on my old LS20
> > > producing sharper scans than my 4000 and someone pointed this 
out)
> > >
> > > I'm also a little unsure of the analogue gain function - there 
seems
> > > to be some suggestion it doesn't affect the lamp brightness in 
B&W,
> > > simply operating on the post processed image.
> > >
> > > The type of workflow I was thinking of is this:
> > >
> > > - use Nikonscan rather than Vuescan
> > > - scan B&W negatives as a 16 bit colour positive;
> > > - preview the negative
> > > - make slight adjustments to analogue gain if the negative 
appears
> > > over or underexposed (i.e significant clipping or bunching up of
> >values)
> > > - use manual focus to focus at the centre of the image
> > > - use GEM to reduce grain (taking up Paul's suggestion)
> > > - use multiscan as and when required (especially archival 
images and
> > > images with problems with shadow definition)
> > > - possibly, use multiple scans with different GEM and analogue 
gain
> > > settings
> > > - convert to B&W in Photoshop - using the colour combiner.
> > >
> > > I've also ordered an Anti-Newton ring glass carrier insert for 
my
> >film
> > > strip holder.
> > >
> > > Can anyone help me here?  Is there anything I should be doing
> > > differently?  This is largely guesswork based on reading a few
> >things.
> > >
> > > And does anyone think I should be using Vuescan instead?  The 
big
> > > advantage to Nikonscan seems to be GEM.  And I might need to
> >calibrate
> > > the Coolscan to get the best out of Vuescan - meaning I need at 
IT8
> > > target!  Don't suppose anyone has an ICC for Coolscan 4000ED?
> > >
> > > Not quite sure how I combine the multiple images.  I have 
Photoshop
> > > CS2.  Paul mentioned the cloning tool...  Paul, do you have open
> > > multiple images and clone between them?  Or am I just totally
> >missing
> > > the point.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Gareth
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other 
> >resources as they are often being updated.
> >
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> >
> >If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you 
wish 
> >to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by 
visiting 
> >this same page.
> >
> >Please follow these basic guidelines:
> >- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages 
> >to keep them short.
> >- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
> >flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed 
> >from the membership without notice.
> >- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of 
digital 
> >B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be 
> >removed from the membership.
> >- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules 
and 
> >guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group 
> >Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in 
the 
> >Files section:
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> >
> >BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE 
> >PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE 
> >"OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP 
SHALL 
> >NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, 
SPECIAL, 
> >CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, 
> >DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER 
INTANGIBLE 
> >LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE 
> >PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH 
> >DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE 
> >DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR 
> >ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR 
> >CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO 
GROUP; 
> >OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT 
YAHOO GROUP.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> Joe Dempsey Communications Co.
> Office / Home 870.534.5835
> Office Downtown 870.536.5758
> Cell 870.550.0190
> http://www.joedempseycommunications.com
>

RE: [Digital BW] Negative scanning workflow: Nikon Coolscan

2005-12-23 by Ken Carney

> I have a Nikon 4000ED with roll film adapter - and I have 
> both Nikon Scan and Vuescan.

	I have never used the roll film adapter, but: wouldn't keeping the
film rolled, even loosely, cause some extra curvature?  I cut mine in strips
of five and use the film strip adapter or the negative carrier.

	I don't know what the answer is for the histogram in Nikon scan.  I
just adjust the black and white points and try to get the flattest scan I
can.  Actually, the best negative scans I have had from the 4000ED are from
b&w chromogenic film such as Portra, or from very fine grain silver film
such as Agfa 25 (RIP).

Ken

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Negative scanning workflow: Nikon Coolscan

2005-12-23 by Joe Dempsey

Steve,
If you select  the first adjustment layer and type control + j 
(command-j on mac) PS will exactly duplicate the adjustment layer.
Joe

And Gareth ... on the images you want to combine, layer one on top of 
the other and set up a layer mask on the top one and brush in what 
you want to see in the lower one. And you can clone from one layer to 
another by selecting sample all layers in the options bar.

Joe


At 03:41 PM 12/23/2005, you wrote:
>Joe,
>
>At least on my computer you cannot set the mode of both adjustment
>layers to color, only the lower one where you actually use the hue
>slider.
>
>Steve
>
>--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Joe Dempsey
><jdempsey@c...> wrote:
> >
> > For what it's worth, here's a technique I use with a plethora of
> > color 35mm negs I have with a Nikon 4000 ED. Scan at 4000 dpi 16
>bit
> > color at 100% with digital ice enabled at full tilt which on a full
> > frame 35mm neg nets about 88 mgb.  This will not set any new indoor
> > records for speedy scanning.
> >
> > Then, I tried a a different BW conversion technique (to me) with
>good
> > results. Open the tif from the scanner and save as a psd. Add a
> > hue/saturation adjustment layer and set the blending mode to color.
> > Duplicate the adjustment layer.  Click on the top adjustment layer
> > and move the saturation slider all the way to the left to
>desaturate.
> > Then adjust the hue on the original (this was the way the article
> > said to do it), but I like adjusting the individual rgb levels
> > channels until I get what I want and sometimes mess with the
>original
> > r,g or b curves as well.  Then do whatever spotting is left that
> > digital ice did not get plus any other tweaks that are required to
> > achieve what I want.
> >
> > Then save a copy. Then go to image size and set the resolution to
>360
> > without resampling which yields something in the neighborhood of
> > 12-13" inches on the tall side. Then, if I want a larger print,
> > resample bicubic sharper to the size I want and save a copy. Then
>if
> > there is a noise issue, apply a light Neat Image treatment and save
>a
> > copy. Then sharpen as necessary and save a copy. Then save as
>grayscale.
> >
> > It's a tedious process, but you can go back to any stage and start
> > over if you don't get what you want. I have gotten 16" inch prints
> > from 35mm negs this way with excellent results. I rely on a friend
> > whose printer is much better than mine to do the prints.
> >
> > My machine is P4/3.6, 2 gb ram with a dedicated 15,000  rpm scuzzy
> > scratch disk.
> >
> > That's my story and I'm stickin' to it.
> > Joe
> >
> >
> > At 11:10 AM 12/23/2005, you wrote:
> > >Gareth-
> > >
> > >I use essentially the approach you suggest on a 5000, with a few
> > >differences.
> > >
> > >I scan a grayscale positive; I use the analogue gain to more-or-
>less
> > >center the data in the histogram (especially important with dense
> > >negatives); I adjust the histogram sliders in but only loosely;
>and I
> > >always scan 8X to reduce noise (the scanner-induced noise is
>random,
> > >so the multiscanning averages out everything that is not consistent
> > >in all eight scans, which is the noise); then I spend two hours
> > >spotting the image in PS!  Also, use 16 bit, which I think you
>didn't
> > >mention.
> > >
> > >What you get is a light, flat image that includes all the data from
> > >the negative.
> > >
> > >Walt
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "garethjolly"
> > ><garethjolly@b...> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Glad everyone is having fun with the Farm Security
>Administration -
> > > > have to say I was blown with the quality of the print of the
>Migrant
> > > > Mother I was able to get.
> > > >
> > > > I think I'm getting on top of my B&W print workflow.
> > > >
> > > > I'm now starting to look at the scanner end of things.
> > > >
> > > > I have a Nikon 4000ED with roll film adapter - and I have both
>Nikon
> > > > Scan and Vuescan.
> > > >
> > > > There seem to be 2 problems with the Nikon / Nikon scan.  The
>first
> > >is
> > > > that Nikon scan insists truncating the histogram - starting
>from 30
> > >in
> > > > the shadows - on negative scans.  The second is focus can be a
> > >little
> > > > out - due to a combination of limited depth of field, slight
> > >curvature
> > > > of the negative in the glassless holder and possibly autofocus
> > > > problems on some images. (I flippantly remarked on my old LS20
> > > > producing sharper scans than my 4000 and someone pointed this
>out)
> > > >
> > > > I'm also a little unsure of the analogue gain function - there
>seems
> > > > to be some suggestion it doesn't affect the lamp brightness in
>B&W,
> > > > simply operating on the post processed image.
> > > >
> > > > The type of workflow I was thinking of is this:
> > > >
> > > > - use Nikonscan rather than Vuescan
> > > > - scan B&W negatives as a 16 bit colour positive;
> > > > - preview the negative
> > > > - make slight adjustments to analogue gain if the negative
>appears
> > > > over or underexposed (i.e significant clipping or bunching up of
> > >values)
> > > > - use manual focus to focus at the centre of the image
> > > > - use GEM to reduce grain (taking up Paul's suggestion)
> > > > - use multiscan as and when required (especially archival
>images and
> > > > images with problems with shadow definition)
> > > > - possibly, use multiple scans with different GEM and analogue
>gain
> > > > settings
> > > > - convert to B&W in Photoshop - using the colour combiner.
> > > >
> > > > I've also ordered an Anti-Newton ring glass carrier insert for
>my
> > >film
> > > > strip holder.
> > > >
> > > > Can anyone help me here?  Is there anything I should be doing
> > > > differently?  This is largely guesswork based on reading a few
> > >things.
> > > >
> > > > And does anyone think I should be using Vuescan instead?  The
>big
> > > > advantage to Nikonscan seems to be GEM.  And I might need to
> > >calibrate
> > > > the Coolscan to get the best out of Vuescan - meaning I need at
>IT8
> > > > target!  Don't suppose anyone has an ICC for Coolscan 4000ED?
> > > >
> > > > Not quite sure how I combine the multiple images.  I have
>Photoshop
> > > > CS2.  Paul mentioned the cloning tool...  Paul, do you have open
> > > > multiple images and clone between them?  Or am I just totally
> > >missing
> > > > the point.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Gareth
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other
> > >resources as they are often being updated.
> > >
> > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> > >
> > >If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you
>wish
> > >to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by
>visiting
> > >this same page.
> > >
> > >Please follow these basic guidelines:
> > >- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages
> > >to keep them short.
> > >- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
> > >flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed
> > >from the membership without notice.
> > >- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of
>digital
> > >B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be
> > >removed from the membership.
> > >- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules
>and
> > >guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group
> > >Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in
>the
> > >Files section:
> > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> > >
> > >BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
> > >PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE
> > >"OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP
>SHALL
> > >NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
>SPECIAL,
> > >CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
> > >DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER
>INTANGIBLE
> > >LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE
> > >PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
> > >DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE
> > >DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR
> > >ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR
> > >CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO
>GROUP;
> > >OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
>YAHOO GROUP.
> > >
> > >Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Joe Dempsey Communications Co.
> > Office / Home 870.534.5835
> > Office Downtown 870.536.5758
> > Cell 870.550.0190
> > http://www.joedempseycommunications.com
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other 
>resources as they are often being updated.
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
>If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish 
>to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting 
>this same page.
>
>Please follow these basic guidelines:
>- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages 
>to keep them short.
>- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
>flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed 
>from the membership without notice.
>- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital 
>B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be 
>removed from the membership.
>- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and 
>guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group 
>Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the 
>Files section:
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
>
>BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE 
>PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE 
>"OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL 
>NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, 
>CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, 
>DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE 
>LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE 
>PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH 
>DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE 
>DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR 
>ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR 
>CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; 
>OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Joe Dempsey Communications Co.
Office / Home 870.534.5835
Office Downtown 870.536.5758
Cell 870.550.0190
http://www.joedempseycommunications.com

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.