Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: Shooting Digitally

Re: Shooting Digitally

2002-01-16 by grdglass@aol.com

Try starting off with 16-bit files and do as much as possible on those in 
Photoshop before converting to 8-bits.


> I am planning to shoot with my Canon D-30, which will give me a
> 8-bit,  
> 17 meg file if I save it as a raw file in the camera.


Tom, you have the D30 confused with the 1D.

>>You might want to check out the http://www.fredmiranda.com site This 
guy is a developer who favors Canons and has a number of plugins for 
sale that improve the banding issues on D30s <<

Helene
   




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Shooting Digitally

2002-01-16 by grdglass@aol.com

Jerry, it's the Fuji interpolated 6MP camera.

Helene

> What is the S-1?
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Shooting Digitally

2002-01-17 by tomoc

Helen-

I definitely might have the two mixed up... I read an article that 
hinted that that was why Fred started writing the software... 
Whatever the reasons, his stuff is very nicely done and not too 
expensive (unless you buy it all <g>).

tom



> Tom, you have the D30 confused with the 1D.
> 
> >>You might want to check out the http://www.fredmiranda.com site 
This 
> guy is a developer who favors Canons and has a number of plugins 
for 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> sale that improve the banding issues on D30s <<
> 
> Helene
>    
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Shooting Digitally

2002-01-17 by steven0356

I just check out his site and he has lot of Actions for the D-30 they 
work great. 

Steve 


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "tomoc" <tomoc@y...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Helen-
> 
> I definitely might have the two mixed up... I read an article that 
> hinted that that was why Fred started writing the software... 
> Whatever the reasons, his stuff is very nicely done and not too 
> expensive (unless you buy it all <g>).
> 
> tom
> 
> 
> 
> > Tom, you have the D30 confused with the 1D.
> > 
> > >>You might want to check out the http://www.fredmiranda.com site 
> This 
> > guy is a developer who favors Canons and has a number of plugins 
> for 
> > sale that improve the banding issues on D30s <<
> > 
> > Helene
> >    
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Shooting Digitally

2002-01-18 by grdglass@aol.com

Reminds me of that old movie, "Blowup."  The photographer solves a murder by 
repeatedly blowing up the tiniest section of a 35mm frame.  Each successive 
blowup gets clearer and sharper and more detailed.  Wonderful movie, but 
those of us in the know...

Helene


> << For example, I recently shot an image in a Charleston Cemetary on 4x5 
> T-Max 100. In the distance, oh perhaps 2 miles away is what looks like a 6 
> story office building. I can zoom in on my scan and see a guy sitting at 
> his 
> desk on the top floor.  >>
> 
> Reminds me of those spy movies where they keep zooming in on a room from a 
> tiny Minox film capture to read the fine print on a book of matches!



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Shooting Digitally

2002-01-18 by qdfb

David Hemmings, wasn't it?  One of my all time favourite movies.  
Casts the B&W photographer as a hero.  I like that in a movie :-)
--
Quentin

-- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., grdglass@a... wrote:
> Reminds me of that old movie, "Blowup."  The photographer solves a 
murder by 
> repeatedly blowing up the tiniest section of a 35mm frame.  Each 
successive 
> blowup gets clearer and sharper and more detailed.  Wonderful 
movie, but 
> those of us in the know...
> 
> Helene
> 
> 
> > << For example, I recently shot an image in a Charleston Cemetary 
on 4x5 
> > T-Max 100. In the distance, oh perhaps 2 miles away is what looks 
like a 6 
> > story office building. I can zoom in on my scan and see a guy 
sitting at 
> > his 
> > desk on the top floor.  >>
> > 
> > Reminds me of those spy movies where they keep zooming in on a 
room from a 
> > tiny Minox film capture to read the fine print on a book of 
matches!
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Digital BW] Re: Shooting Digitally

2002-01-18 by Bruce Kinch

>David Hemmings, wasn't it?  One of my all time favourite movies. 
>Casts the B&W photographer as a hero.  I like that in a movie :-)

Especially since the color prints I've seen of late have faded 
dramatically. And in a film where director Antonioni went around 
repainting everything just so, including the grass in the park:-)

Bruce

>--
>Quentin
>
>-- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., grdglass@a... wrote:
>>  Reminds me of that old movie, "Blowup."  The photographer solves a
>murder by
>>  repeatedly blowing up the tiniest section of a 35mm frame.  Each
>successive
>>  blowup gets clearer and sharper and more detailed.  Wonderful
>movie, but
>  > those of us in the know...

--

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting Digitally

2002-01-21 by Derek Clarke

Of course modern chromogenic mono films like T-Max are colour films in 
disguise and have no better archive life than colour.

And don't resin-coated papers also have shorter lifetimes?

Back to that printer chiselling away at the granite slab idea...
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Friday 18 Jan 2002 10:33 pm, Bruce Kinch wrote:
> >David Hemmings, wasn't it?  One of my all time favourite movies.
> >Casts the B&W photographer as a hero.  I like that in a movie :-)
>
> Especially since the color prints I've seen of late have faded
> dramatically. And in a film where director Antonioni went around
> repainting everything just so, including the grass in the park:-)
>
> Bruce
>
> >--
> >Quentin
> >
> >-- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., grdglass@a... wrote:
> >>  Reminds me of that old movie, "Blowup."  The photographer solves a
> >
> >murder by
> >
> >>  repeatedly blowing up the tiniest section of a 35mm frame.  Each
> >
> >successive
> >
> >>  blowup gets clearer and sharper and more detailed.  Wonderful
> >
> >movie, but
> >
> >  > those of us in the know...

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.