Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Buffered vs Alpha Cellulose

Buffered vs Alpha Cellulose

2008-03-04 by Richard Smallfield

Hi,
I am about to get into mat cutting and wondered what experiences people have of the longevity of buffered acid-free mat boards (like Bainbridge Novacore) as opposed to Alpha Cellulose boards (like AlphaMat).

thanks,
Richard
--
http://smallfield.vze.com

   "Ignorance is a voluntary misfortune."
   --Nicholas Ling

Re: [Digital BW] Buffered vs Alpha Cellulose

2008-03-04 by Ernst Dinkla

Richard Smallfield wrote:
> Hi,
> I am about to get into mat cutting and wondered what experiences people have of the longevity of buffered acid-free mat boards (like Bainbridge Novacore) as opposed to Alpha Cellulose boards (like AlphaMat).
> 
> thanks,
> Richard
> --
> http://smallfield.vze.com

Do you expect the last are not buffered ?  If so avoid them 
but I find it strange that they actually exist.

-- 
Met vriendelijke groeten,  Ernst


|  Dinkla Grafische Techniek  |
|     www.pigment-print.com    |
|             ( unvollendet )            |

Re: [Digital BW] Buffered vs Alpha Cellulose

2008-03-04 by pr_roark

AlphaMat Artcare is supposed to be an excellent product.  See 
http://www.nielsen-bainbridge.com/bainbridge/NB-SysAlphamat.html  In 
addition to buffering, the product contains molecular traps or 
zeolites that absorb atmospheric pollutants.  See 
http://palimpsest.stanford.edu/waac/wn/wn18/wn18-1/wn18-106.html  

Paul          
www.PaulRoark.com 


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Ernst Dinkla 
<E.Dinkla@...> wrote:
>
> Richard Smallfield wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am about to get into mat cutting and wondered what experiences 
people have of the longevity of buffered acid-free mat boards (like 
Bainbridge Novacore) as opposed to Alpha Cellulose boards (like 
AlphaMat).
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > 
> > thanks,
> > Richard
> > --
> > http://smallfield.vze.com
> 
> Do you expect the last are not buffered ?  If so avoid them 
> but I find it strange that they actually exist.
> 
> -- 
> Met vriendelijke groeten,  Ernst
> 
> 
> |  Dinkla Grafische Techniek  |
> |     www.pigment-print.com    |
> |             ( unvollendet )            |
>

Re: Paper vs Alpha Cellulose

2008-03-05 by Mark Rogers

Alpha cellulose is a mat material and buffered is a material 
treatment so you cant really compare them. Novacore is a paper mat 
product which means that it is made from naturally acid wood pulp. It 
is treated with calcium carbonate (TUMS), to temporarily shift the pH 
balance from acid to alkaline. Over time it will return to its normal 
acidic pH balance.  It is considered for use in temporary framing. 
Alpha Cellulose is an inert product that over time can become 
contaminated with acid compounds. For that reason it is often 
buffered, and in Bainbridge's case it is also treated with their 
Artcare process. The Artcare process allows it to actively neutralize 
acidic compounds entering the frame package so that instead of the 
mat just being neutral, it actually actively protects the art. I have 
more information about different mat board types on my website here:

http://www.framedestination.com/picture_frame_info.html#mat_types

Cheers,
Mark


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Richard 
Smallfield <r.smallfield@...> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I am about to get into mat cutting and wondered what experiences 
people have of the longevity of buffered acid-free mat boards (like 
Bainbridge Novacore) as opposed to Alpha Cellulose boards (like 
AlphaMat).
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> thanks,
> Richard
> --
> http://smallfield.vze.com
> 
>    "Ignorance is a voluntary misfortune."
>    --Nicholas Ling
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.