Buffered vs Alpha Cellulose
2008-03-04 by Richard Smallfield
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC
Thread
2008-03-04 by Richard Smallfield
Hi, I am about to get into mat cutting and wondered what experiences people have of the longevity of buffered acid-free mat boards (like Bainbridge Novacore) as opposed to Alpha Cellulose boards (like AlphaMat). thanks, Richard -- http://smallfield.vze.com "Ignorance is a voluntary misfortune." --Nicholas Ling
2008-03-04 by Ernst Dinkla
Richard Smallfield wrote: > Hi, > I am about to get into mat cutting and wondered what experiences people have of the longevity of buffered acid-free mat boards (like Bainbridge Novacore) as opposed to Alpha Cellulose boards (like AlphaMat). > > thanks, > Richard > -- > http://smallfield.vze.com Do you expect the last are not buffered ? If so avoid them but I find it strange that they actually exist. -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Ernst | Dinkla Grafische Techniek | | www.pigment-print.com | | ( unvollendet ) |
2008-03-04 by pr_roark
AlphaMat Artcare is supposed to be an excellent product. See http://www.nielsen-bainbridge.com/bainbridge/NB-SysAlphamat.html In addition to buffering, the product contains molecular traps or zeolites that absorb atmospheric pollutants. See http://palimpsest.stanford.edu/waac/wn/wn18/wn18-1/wn18-106.html Paul www.PaulRoark.com --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Ernst Dinkla <E.Dinkla@...> wrote: > > Richard Smallfield wrote: > > Hi, > > I am about to get into mat cutting and wondered what experiences people have of the longevity of buffered acid-free mat boards (like Bainbridge Novacore) as opposed to Alpha Cellulose boards (like AlphaMat).
> > > > thanks, > > Richard > > -- > > http://smallfield.vze.com > > Do you expect the last are not buffered ? If so avoid them > but I find it strange that they actually exist. > > -- > Met vriendelijke groeten, Ernst > > > | Dinkla Grafische Techniek | > | www.pigment-print.com | > | ( unvollendet ) | >
2008-03-05 by Mark Rogers
Alpha cellulose is a mat material and buffered is a material treatment so you cant really compare them. Novacore is a paper mat product which means that it is made from naturally acid wood pulp. It is treated with calcium carbonate (TUMS), to temporarily shift the pH balance from acid to alkaline. Over time it will return to its normal acidic pH balance. It is considered for use in temporary framing. Alpha Cellulose is an inert product that over time can become contaminated with acid compounds. For that reason it is often buffered, and in Bainbridge's case it is also treated with their Artcare process. The Artcare process allows it to actively neutralize acidic compounds entering the frame package so that instead of the mat just being neutral, it actually actively protects the art. I have more information about different mat board types on my website here: http://www.framedestination.com/picture_frame_info.html#mat_types Cheers, Mark --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Richard Smallfield <r.smallfield@...> wrote: > > Hi, > I am about to get into mat cutting and wondered what experiences people have of the longevity of buffered acid-free mat boards (like Bainbridge Novacore) as opposed to Alpha Cellulose boards (like AlphaMat).
> > thanks, > Richard > -- > http://smallfield.vze.com > > "Ignorance is a voluntary misfortune." > --Nicholas Ling >