On 3/15/08 at 7:28 AM Mark MacKenzie wrote:
>Hello Gary.
>
>If you are concerned about longevity and the print "presentation" to be
>unchanging after you have printed, dried and coated it then don't use
>hairspray. It just isn't the way to go.
>
>While there may be a few twenty to thirty year old prints treated with
>hairspray they will be on their very last legs now and will have changed
>markedly. It is just the chemistry aging kinetics of such materials which
>were never designed for such use or such a "long life".
>
>Back in the 1950's and 1970's when this process was finding some favour
>amongst some artists who were probably cash strapped or used to reaching
>for
>"whatever" was handy to work with and preserve "the creative moment" we
>found out fairly quickly that such techniques held no merit and should be
>avoided.
>
>If you are concerned about cans with residues try putting a little of the
>preferred solvent into the can and then after swishing this around pour it
>out into a smaller fresh container. Put a bit more solvent in, swish,
>pour
>and keep this solvent and coating mixture for use in thinning out the next
>new can of the same coating. The old can should be allowed to air dry
>completely and then when any minute quantities are solid, the can is much
>more safely disposable as far as ground water contamination goes.
>
>This process is derived from "serial dilution" techniques and is one of
>the
>best methods for using very little solvent to get rid of the largest
>amount
>of resin in the can.
>
>If you have kept your old can and its contents clean you may not have to
>filter but if you use this technique it is probably best to filter through
>several doubled layers of cheese cloth placed into a fresh paint filter
>and
>then pour the saved solvent/resin through this and into a clean jar. This
>is best done at the time of "swishing" out the original can. This is a
>good
>way to keep those print destroying bits of congealed resin off your print
>surface in any case.
>
>Regards
>
>Mark MacKenzie
>
>Director of Conservation/Chief Conservator
>Conservation Department
>Museum Resources Division, Department of Cultural Affairs
>State of New Mexico
>Santa Fe, NM
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Gary Weaver" <garww@...>
>To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
>Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 2:45 AM
>Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Hairspray as Gloss Optimiser
>
>
>Well, they used to have to blow through an atomizer. You can do the same
>thing : ) How retro is that.
>
>gar
>
>*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>
>On 3/15/08 at 9:14 PM Richard Smallfield wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>today a friend mentioned that she knew an artist that used hairspray as a
>>fixative for pastels and charcoal drawings, which brought to mind recent
>>discussions of hairspray.
>>
>>If artists are doing it, maybe it's an old practice and maybe there is
>>some knowledge about its long term implications.
>>
>>Obviously print longevity was never a factor in formulating these sprays:)
>>
>>So I'm wondering if anyone knows of old twenty or thirty year old prints
>>of any kind, that had had the hairspray fixative method of print
>>protection. (Optimising gloss would not have been a factor back then, but
>>maybe protection??)
>>
>>I've just discovered that with Lyson Print Guard on Eterna Excell or Moab
>>Colorado Gloss I can get fantastic results - virtually no gloss
>>differential with sufficient spraying (two coats minimum).
>>
>>But these solvent sprays are pretty toxic and I don't like the idea of
>>cans rusting away in the landfill in a few years and releasing their brew
>>into the ground water ... so I wonder if maybe a coat of print guard to
>>seal the print and then some hair spray might be a compromise.
>>
>>Any thoughts would be appreciated.
>>
>>Richard
>>--
>>http://smallfield.vze.com
>>
>> "Imagination is more important than knowledge."
>> --Albert Einstein
>>
>>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
>they are often being updated.
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
>If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
>unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
>page.
>
>Please follow these basic guidelines:
>- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
>them short.
>- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
>Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
>membership without notice.
>- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
>printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from
>the membership.
>- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
>guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner
>and Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files
>section:
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
>
>BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
>YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND
>MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO
>YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR
>EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF
>PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE
>OWNER AND MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN
>ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE
>OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii)
>UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii)
>STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
>YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
>PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>