Digital BW, The Print

Off topic here but with so many B&W film users in this list 
I might be excused,
see rangefinder forum discussions:

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=63899

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=63934


-- 
Met vriendelijke groeten,  Ernst


|  Dinkla Grafische Techniek  |
|     www.pigment-print.com    |
|             ( unvollendet )            |

Some pictures here:

http://davidbram.blogspot.com/

Cheers,
Andr�

andre1moreau wrote:
> Some pictures here:
> 
> http://davidbram.blogspot.com/
> 
> Cheers,
> Andr\ufffd
> 
> 

So he copied my handcopied text fast, without a thank you.

-- 
Met vriendelijke groeten,  Ernst


|  Dinkla Grafische Techniek  |
|     www.pigment-print.com    |
|             ( unvollendet )            |

> Some pictures here:
> 
> http://davidbram.blogspot.com/

I might go for a wide angle version of this folder if it perfomed as 
well as the 645 Zi I had.  On the other hand, the old Fuji folder I had 
was not something I found easy to do the type of work I like -- even 
for hand held, casual but enlargeable B&W images.  The ability to keep 
the lens axis precisely aligned would be one of my main concerns.   I 
also found the handling of the old folder was hampered -- for me -- by 
the smallness of the controls.  I found it difficult to use quickly and 
accurately.  But a small, modern 6x7 folder with a 55mm lens would be 
real tempting.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

pr_roark wrote:
>  The ability to keep
> the lens axis precisely aligned would be one of my main concerns.   I 
> also found the handling of the old folder was hampered -- for me -- by 
> the smallness of the controls.  I found it difficult to use quickly and 
> accurately.  But a small, modern 6x7 folder with a 55mm lens would be 
> real tempting.

More or less what I advocated after I saw the first pictures 
of it maybe a year ago.
A wide angle and 56x82 mm frame size (the Nikon 8000-9000 
max scan format :-).
That still folds to  coat pocket size.
I do not understand Fuji's policy on this, they want to sell 
film so make the frame size larger.

-- 
Met vriendelijke groeten,  Ernst


|  Dinkla Grafische Techniek  |
|     www.pigment-print.com    |
|             ( unvollendet )            |

> A wide angle and 56x82 mm frame size (the Nikon 8000-9000 
> max scan format :-).
> That still folds to  coat pocket size.

While we're dreaming, maybe we could get Fuji to make a C41 process 
version of Tech Pan film.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

More dream than that please: Panatomic-X!!!

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "pr_roark"
<pr_roark@...> wrote:

>
> 
> > A wide angle and 56x82 mm frame size (the Nikon 8000-9000 
> > max scan format :-).
> > That still folds to  coat pocket size.
> 
> While we're dreaming, maybe we could get Fuji to make a C41 process 
> version of Tech Pan film.
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
>

And more: digital!

Mark
http://www.stillrivereditions.com

On Sep 26, 2008, at 11:17 AM, maximalimage wrote:

> More dream than that please: Panatomic-X!!!
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "pr_roark"
> <pr_roark@...> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> A wide angle and 56x82 mm frame size (the Nikon 8000-9000
>>> max scan format :-).
>>> That still folds to  coat pocket size.
>>
>> While we're dreaming, maybe we could get Fuji to make a C41 process
>> version of Tech Pan film.
>>
>> Paul
>> www.PaulRoark.com
>>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Mark,

 

I took a look at your website
.very nice selection of services.

 

I have a question: which Cone inks are you using on Harman Gloss Paper?  Are
you using any a gloss optimizer with this setup?  Which printer are you
using?

 

Thank you,

George

 

George C. Pappas

george@pappasonline.net

(703) 268-3196

  _____  

From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark
Savoia
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 11:26 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: OT Fuji GF670 = Voigtländer Bessa III

 

And more: digital!

Mark
http://www.stillriv <http://www.stillrivereditions.com> ereditions.com

On Sep 26, 2008, at 11:17 AM, maximalimage wrote:

> More dream than that please: Panatomic-X!!!
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhit
<mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>
eThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "pr_roark"
> <pr_roark@...> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> A wide angle and 56x82 mm frame size (the Nikon 8000-9000
>>> max scan format :-).
>>> That still folds to coat pocket size.
>>
>> While we're dreaming, maybe we could get Fuji to make a C41 process
>> version of Tech Pan film.
>>
>> Paul
>> www.PaulRoark.com
>>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 3474 (20080926) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Pan-X is ... so pictoral  :  ) Hardly a serious film  :  )

gar - still using the thin aero Pan-X

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 9/26/2008 at 3:17 PM maximalimage wrote:

>More dream than that please: Panatomic-X!!!
>
>--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "pr_roark"
><pr_roark@...> wrote:
>>
>> 
>> > A wide angle and 56x82 mm frame size (the Nikon 8000-9000 
>> > max scan format :-).
>> > That still folds to  coat pocket size.
>> 
>> While we're dreaming, maybe we could get Fuji to make a C41 process 
>> version of Tech Pan film.
>> 
>> Paul
>> www.PaulRoark.com