Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: [Digital BW] 4 Todd: MIS VM and Piezo Questions

Re: [Digital BW] 4 Todd: MIS VM and Piezo Questions

2001-08-19 by Steadman Uhlich

Todd, 
Thanks for the note.  Cleared up some of the fog...

Steadman
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Todd Flashner 
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 1:10 PM
  Subject: Re: [Digital BW] 4 Paul Roark: MIS VM and Piezo Questions


  on 8/19/01 12:32 PM, Steadman Uhlich wrote:

  > On another note...your responses make it seem so easy.  I wonder why some of
  > the other discussions on this list leave me in a fog when people talk about
  > transfer curves and related techo speak stuff?

  Steadman,

  I would suggest some of this talk, which I have been guilty of, is due to
  the sudden opportunity to discuss some of these *possibilities* now that
  this list exists. Some of the workflow conversations of the Piezo system
  have a FAQ and website @ inkjetmall. The other systems have this list. You
  are just seeing a flurry of discussions regarding possible ways to expand
  the system and push it's boundaries.

  This is esoterica, and not a requirement of the system except in some
  circumstances. In the Roark method you use curves, whereas in the Piezo
  system you use profiles. As you've probably noticed in the Piezo system, one
  or two profiles will go a long way. You could probably do most of your Piezo
  "production" work with the Orwell profile, an Somerset Enhanced. Likewise
  Paul's EAM curve covers EAM, LPM, and the Hahnemuhle papers quite well. It
  does fall down for Hawk Mountain, and Brightcube papers for instance. If you
  are committed to using these papers you'll need to modify the curves or the
  workflow. But Piezo doesn't include profiles for these papers either, so
  mucking about is required there too. However I believe more of us have
  facility with curves than we do with monochromatic profiling packages, and
  methodologies, so I believe as a group we can push through such bottlenecks
  faster on our own, than pleading our case to Cone. :-)

  In the end, you'll just have to jump in and test the water, but the price is
  right for a casual swim.

  Todd


        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
              ADVERTISEMENT
             
       
       

  If you do not wish to belong to Digital B&W, The Print, you may
  unsubscribe by sending an email to:
  DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] MIS VM and Piezo Questions: 4 Steadman

2001-08-19 by Todd Flashner

> Todd, 
> Thanks for the note.  Cleared up some of the fog...

You're welcome. I have a question for you now.

Why do you change the subject headers so much? I was already following this
thread as you know, 'cause I participated in it, so I really don't need it
called to my personal attention. The downside for me is that my email
program sorts a thread by the beginning of the thread name. If I ever want
to go back through my archive, this message will not group with those that
proceeded it. I see this occurring a lot. Branches upon branches of threads,
splintering apart based upon specific individuals names. I'll really hate to
want to see the entirety of a thread in the future when I have to try to
gather all it's disparate name components. What I'll get is a huge string of
messages that start with "4...", but are in no way connected.

Does your mail program work differently than mine, such that your method is
effective? For me this doesn't work very well at all. Seems to me, if you'd
just add your addendum at the rear of the subject line, rather than the
start, you'd accomplish your targeting without obliterating the continuity.
But perhaps I'm just old fashioned. ;-)

Sorry for my usual bluntness,
Todd

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.