Digital BW, The Print

occasionally I see little "white" flaws that I'd rather spot than 
reprint - anyone had experience using what ? Spotone, the inks 
themselves, pencil ?
frankg

--- frankg_photo <frank@...> wrote:
> occasionally I see little "white" flaws that
> I'd rather spot than 
> reprint - anyone had experience using what ?
> Spotone, the inks 
> themselves, pencil ?
> frankg


Frank, 

I have used spotone with great success.

Don Eby

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com

Why not use the inks themselves?

If you use a CIS, you have four pots of retouching ink just to the right of
your printer ;)

Nij

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Don Eby [mailto:don_eby@...]
> Sent: 16 February 2002 23:20
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Spotting finished prints
>
>
>
> --- frankg_photo <frank@...> wrote:
> > occasionally I see little "white" flaws that
> > I'd rather spot than
> > reprint - anyone had experience using what ?
> > Spotone, the inks
> > themselves, pencil ?
> > frankg
>
>
> Frank,
>
> I have used spotone with great success.
>
> Don Eby
>

I've used spotone and pencil with some success.  I
always try to spot first, reprint second.  Using the
inks sounds like a good idea.  I was never a good
print spotter to begin with, so thankgoodness for PS
and the clone tool minimizing spotting to the
occational white speck due to flaking.

Thom


--- frankg_photo <frank@...> wrote:

> occasionally I see little "white" flaws that I'd
> rather spot than 
> reprint - anyone had experience using what ?
> Spotone, the inks 
> themselves, pencil ?
> frankg
>