Doepfer

Hi there sfrules,

I admit that I used the a-word in my quantizer-idea, but only to make 
it clear that the output of a quantizer doesn't have to be limited to 
scales, but that even *arpeggio-like* patterns should be possivble, 
and even patterns spanning more than one octave. 

Florian and Joosts postings about an arpeggio-generator are quite a 
different cup of tea, because a *classic* arpeggio is derived from a 
chord (a few different voltages/midi values at the same time) and a 
... well .. *pseudo-arpeggio* (?) from a quantizer would be derived 
from one single (monophonic?) dynamic voltage. That's quite 
different. Personally I like both ideas.

Anton

On 21 May 2006, at 10:30, sfrules wrote:

> 
> Hello,
> 
> I am getting major confused.
> There is much talk of a quantizer
> and much talk of an arpeggiator.
> 
> I can roughly follow each, but
> when you speak of putting them in
> the same module my cerebral cortex
> shorts out!!!
> 
> Is it possible that an arpeggiator
> would make a better stand-alone module?
> Cheeper, too?
> 
> sfrules
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
>