Doepfer

Good morning,

Personally I like these values, I'm not into echo's that are timed dead
straight.

Thanks and greetings

Anton

> Anton,
>
> the six taps of the BBD are prescribed by the circuit used (MN3011) and
> cannot be changed. It's the only BBD chip with several taps I know.
>
> Best wishes
> Dieter Doepfer
>
>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
>> [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]Im Auftrag von Anton Coops
>> Gesendet: Samstag, 9. September 2006 10:49
>> An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
>> Betreff: Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: New impressive Doepfer modules
>> revealed!!!
>>
>>
>> Hello Mr. Doepfer,
>>
>> Congratulations on two more winning designs.
>>
>> I was wondering: what is the reason behind the non-linear values of
>> the various BBD-taps? Is this because of the properties of the BBD?
>> Like for instance 3328/396 = 8.4
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Anton
>>
>>
>> On 8 Sep 2006, at 9:58, hardware@doepfer.de wrote:
>>
>> > Ingo,
>> >
>> > thank you for this clarification. Yes, the circuit used in the
>> new VCO has a
>> > VCF and VCA available and this may explain some of the unusual
>> functions of
>> > the module. Of course we could omit these sections to obtain a
>> "pure" VCO
>> > but this does not make sense from my point of view. And don't forget
>> the
>> > linear FM of the filter. This is not possible with any other
>> filter of the
>> > A-100 (I don't know if there are other filters with linear FM
>> available).
>> > And a VCA for AM applications is not a bad idea too. So you
>> could treat the
>> > VCF and VCA as a (nearly) free extra.
>> >
>> > Best wishes
>> > Dieter Doepfer
>> >
>> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> > > Von: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
>> > > [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]Im Auftrag von selfoscillate
>> > > Gesendet: Freitag, 8. September 2006 08:29
>> > > An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
>> > > Betreff: [Doepfer_a100] Re: New impressive Doepfer modules
>> revealed!!!
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > hello guys,
>> > >
>> > > just to clear some things out on the new a111/2 dynamic vco:
>> > >
>> > > the module uses a special ic for it's functions.
>> > > this ic features not only the vco, but it has also
>> > > the vcf, the vca and the panning unit built-in.
>> > > since all the parts are already there, they are brought
>> > > out to the front panel. the vcf in the a111/2 is similar
>> > > to the vcf in the a109, but it is not the same, as the vcf
>> > > in the a111/2 can be modulated with the triangle core
>> > > waveform in a linear manner. in other words, you can do
>> > > linear fm on that vcf and you cannot do this with any other
>> > > a100 filter (they all have exponential fm). the built-in
>> > > panning unit is basically the same as in the a109, but
>> > > again you will use it differently in the a111/2.
>> > > in the a111/2 you will use it to create new waveforms.
>> > > so after all the a111/2 does not intentionally replicate
>> > > some of the a109 features, it just has all the stuff
>> > > on-board which is needed for this new vco design,
>> > > and it offers the vcf because it is part of the ic
>> > > and has that linear-fm-feature.
>> > >
>> > > naturally it is possible to use the a111/2 as an almost
>> > > complete synth voice (also a module some people have asked for),
>> > > but that was not what dieter wanted to achieve in the first
>> > > place. the module should more be seen as a new vco approach
>> > > which can "alternatively" be used as a synth voice.
>> > >
>> > > the module also shouldn't be compared with a buchla 259,
>> > > as it uses completely different techniques (except that
>> > > both have a triangle vco core) and offers completely
>> > > different features. i can understand the expectations and
>> > > yes, the 259 is gorgeous, but it's really a different
>> > > pair of shoes.
>> > >
>> > > best wishes
>> > >
>> > > ingo
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Axel Jungkunst <phaedra@...>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Just my opinion! I'm a bit surprised of the doubling of the 109-
>> > > features
>> > > > into a new module.
>> > > > The 259 features or something in this way would have been that I
>> > > had
>> > > > expected!
>> > > > All the best
>> > > > Axel
>> > > >
>> > > > Jay schrieb:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Bakis Sirros wrote:
>> > > > > > hello jay,
>> > > > > > for standard stuff the a109 is ok.
>> > > > > > the a111-2 is for more wierd stuff though.
>> > > > > > best regards,
>> > > > > > Bakis.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I understand that the new oscillator has different features and
>> > > how they
>> > > > > can be used. I'm just saying that the pan/filter/vca part seems
>> > > quite
>> > > > > redundant in a modular synthesizer. That space could better be
>> > > used for
>> > > > > a second modulation oscillator like a Buchla 259.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>     (Yahoo! ID required)
>
>     mailto:Doepfer_a100-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>