Doepfer

I agree, attenuation really gives you more room to play with shape... the same can be said for the WVX serge waveshaper from Bananalogue. 

Tony

> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> From: synaptic_music@yahoo.com
> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 15:21:54 +0000
> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Thoughts on the A-136 Distortion/Waveshaper?
> 
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "djsoysos" <djsoysos@...> wrote:
> >
> > Anybody out there have cool uses for
> > the A-136 Distortion/Waveshaper?
> > Mine hasn't seen much use lately.
> > Soy Sos
> >
> 
> the most important thing is not to use unattenuated
> waveforms from a vco. i found it most appealing
> to use lowpass-filtered signals with much lower
> output level than the direct vco waveforms,
> lets say around 50 % of the usual vco output level.
> same applies to external signals. it is not necessary
> to use simple waveforms only, the input signal for the
> a136 can also be quite complex. the key is to
> scale the a136 input correctly. since the a136
> has no input attenuator you have to use another
> module for that task, like a vca, mixer of vcf.
> i also got interesting results when inserting
> the a136 in the feedback loop of a vcf.
> 
> best wishes
> 
> ingo
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 

_________________________________________________________________
Connect and share in new ways with Windows Live.
http://www.windowslive.com/connect.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_Wave2_newways_112007

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]