Doepfer

Thanks for the information, keld. Instead of using the mod wheel, is 
it possible to set the MCV4's bend range to zero, and pick up the 
pitch bender CV from one of the assignable jacks instead?

It's kind of a bummer anyway, because my slew limiter tends to get 
used up already, smoothing out the 8-bit zippering from the A190/191.

Perhaps I'm being foolish. If I added up all of the money that I'd 
end up having invested in the A190, A191, and MCV4, maybe the MCV24 
isn't looking so expensive. I'd get my slew limiter back. I could 
also use the MCV24's software envelopes instead of limping along with 
only one ADSR for the second voice. Replacing the A190/191 would also 
"buy back" 22U of A100 frame space, which I could use for other 
things, like maybe to add another VCO, mixer, and VCA.

I'll have to think about this some more. Comments are welcome.

Joe

--- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "studio1dk" <keld.soerensen1@s...> wrote:
> I´m using the MCV4 with my A-100. It works Ok but if you use the 
> pitch-bend you´ll hear small "steps" and not a gliding tone 
> (quanticed). I use the mod-wheel patched through the slew limiter 
and 
> get the bending there. 
> 
> keld
> 
> --- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "buechlerjoe" <buechlerjoe@t...> wrote:
> > I'd like to have an extra Midi channel for occasional duophonic 
> > operation of my A100. I can drive the A100 from two different 
> > Regelwerk tracks using the CV outputs, but I'd like to be able to 
> run 
> > it that way from a Midi sequencer also.
> > 
> > I don't need all of the channels and outputs of the MCV24, and 
> don't 
> > want to pay the price. Has anyone used the MCV4 for this purpose? 
> Are 
> > there any problems with this arrangement? Are there other 
solutions 
> > that I should also be considering?
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > Joe