> But you want > > Stepnumber 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > clock .1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. > /2 .11..11..11..11.. > /4 .1111....1111.... couldn't follow that (are the dots zeros?) but this... > And the best thing for percussion triggering would be > > Stepnumber 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > clock .1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. > /2 .1...1...1...1... > /3 .1.....1.....1... > /4 .1.......1....... ...is what i mean. all gates (or trigers) are on when the start order comes. if the clock is sending 16ths, then the /2 output is sending 8ths etc. why would this need a lot of hardware? the /2 output passes the first click it gets, ignores the second, passes the third. the /4 output passes the first and fifth etc. if a device is designed to go high on the first trigger and low on the second, then all you need is a chain of these devices, with a tap after each one for the relevant output. bakis, a delay wouldn't help - are you maybe referring to that other thread (a190 and sync) ? florian's suggested clock module is more than i need, but i would most certainly buy it. i assume, then, that there is no simple solution? yours, Puzzled of Dortmund :)
Message
Re: clock division: am i missing something?
2008-02-28 by Stu Grimshaw
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.