Hi Stuart >>Stepnumber 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >> clock .1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. >> /2 .11..11..11..11.. >> /4 .1111....1111.... > couldn't follow that (are the dots zeros?) but this... Yes. I used dots instead of zeros because its more readable. >>And the best thing for percussion triggering would be >> >>Stepnumber 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >> clock .1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. >> /2 .1...1...1...1... >> /3 .1.....1.....1... >> /4 .1.......1....... > > > ...is what i mean. all gates (or trigers) are on when the start order > comes. if the clock is sending 16ths, then the /2 output is sending > 8ths etc. > why would this need a lot of hardware? you need for each stage an additional inverter and an AND. > if a device is designed to go high on > the first trigger and low on the second, then all you need is a chain > of these devices, with a tap after each one for the relevant output. Thats a nice thought, but thats not how these divider chips are built. That what you mean would require a dedicated RS-Flipflop with all outputs available for each stage. The divider ICs as used in the A-160 have a chain of RS-Flipflops, but they are connected in the wrong way with each other (if its of interest I can post details). So you'd need eight Divider ICs plus two 4xAND-Chips for this, where the standard A-160 goes with one chip - and with that you still do not have the divide by three part. Florian
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: clock division: am i missing something?
2008-02-28 by Florian Anwander
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.