> hallo mark, > > there are different things that i'm after, but an easy one to follow > is having several envelopes, one of which should fire off at every > quarter, one of which at every bar etc. after a reset/start they > should all fire off on the 1, and then keep going at their respective > intervals. quite the opposite happens with the a190, since the all the > gates start off with "off". > > to express it in binary terms, directly after a start i have 00000000 > when what i need is 11111111. > > this is the reverse of the a190's behaviour. dieter, can this be > hacked? very unlikely, i know, but if you don't ask you don't get :) > > cheers, > > stu That's not a problem of the A-190 as it outputs only clock and start/stop but has no trigger/gate outputs but the device controlled by the A-190 ! I know the problems you are talking about as I had many years ago a master clock unit with a lot of trigger and gate outputs., positive and negative edge triggered clock and reset inputs and many more. A bit similar to the A-160 and and A-161 but even with inverted and trigger outputs, and inverted clock/reset inputs. To emulate these functions several additional trigger inverters are required (A-165). If I understand your problem it could be solved by the A-161 and the A-186-1 as the A-161 has a separate gate output for each step available. To solve the 000/111 problem simply use output #2 of the A-161 as the first gate. The outputs of the A-161 can be combined by the A-186-1. We could develop a master clock module (e.g. a copy of my old device) but I'm not sure if there are sufficient inquiries. Best wishes Dieter Doepfer
Message
AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: clock division: am i missing something?
2008-02-28 by hardware@doepfer.de
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.