Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Message

AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: clock division: am i missing something?

2008-02-28 by hardware@doepfer.de

> hallo mark,
>
> there are different things that i'm after, but an easy one to follow
> is having several envelopes, one of which should fire off at every
> quarter, one of which at every bar etc. after a reset/start they
> should all fire off on the 1, and then keep going at their respective
> intervals. quite the opposite happens with the a190, since the all the
> gates start off with "off".
>
> to express it in binary terms, directly after a start i have 00000000
> when what i need is 11111111.
>
> this is the reverse of the a190's behaviour. dieter, can this be
> hacked? very unlikely, i know, but if you don't ask you don't get :)
>
> cheers,
>
> stu

That's not a problem of the A-190 as it outputs only clock and start/stop
but has no trigger/gate outputs but the device controlled by the A-190 !

I know the problems you are talking about as I had many years ago a master
clock unit with a lot of trigger and gate outputs., positive and negative
edge triggered clock and reset inputs and many more. A bit similar to the
A-160 and and A-161 but even with inverted and trigger outputs, and inverted
clock/reset inputs. To emulate these functions several additional trigger
inverters are required (A-165).

If I understand your problem it could be solved by the A-161 and the A-186-1
as the A-161 has a separate gate output for each step available. To solve
the 000/111 problem simply use output #2 of the A-161 as the first gate. The
outputs of the A-161 can be combined by the A-186-1.

We could develop a master clock module (e.g. a copy of my old device) but
I'm not sure if there are sufficient inquiries.

Best wishes
Dieter Doepfer

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.