Hello Korhan > Florian, can you please elaborate on the use of A160,161 or the A151. I am > totally unfamiliar with these modules and cannot imagine how I could use > them in my setup. An example that contains some of the modules mentioned > here would be very useful. Have alook at http://www.doepfer.de/a100_man/A161_man.pdf Page 8 contains an example for the usage of A161 with A131 as a sequencer. The A-151 would work similar, but to achieve the same effect you have to feed a constant voltage into the common i/o of the module. You will get more variations if this is not a constant voltage but a LFO or some quasi random stuff (like LFOs in the audio range or VCOs). > What would happen if an instrument, a clarinet or tenor sax, is fed directly > into a PLL? You can assume that the instrumentalists are virtuosos and can > play whatever is required. I am looking for radical changes - > I would prefer terrible pitch tracking to very good pitch tracking. Then the A-196 is the right choice: terrible pitch tracking at its best. > the frequency and hence want the A-110. Envelope out from A-119 would be a > nice modulation source for the A-110, I guess. That is right. Especially if you use the VCO-out as modulation source for a high resonating VCF (can create some "talking" sounds). > The S&H is the A-148.Slew limiters are 170 and 171. 170 has two, 171 has CV > control. Which one should I get? I'm usually a numbers guy and assume 2 is > better than 1. ok, AS does not have a S&H + Slewlimiter as combimodule. But others that are interesting: http://www.analoguesystems.co.uk/modules/rs40.htm http://www.analoguesystems.co.uk/modules/rs380.htm The A171 slewlimiter is definitely recommended over the A170, because of its usability in connection with the PLL A-196 (too complicated to explain now). Florian
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Modules for acoustic instrument processing
2008-03-03 by Florian Anwander
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.