Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Message

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: starting a modular

2008-11-23 by Richard Scott

yes, if you bring your 2000e with you

my couch is in berlin

R


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Sean Hart 
  To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 8:18 PM
  Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: starting a modular


  oh, i know it will not sound like a buchla. i am convinced that thing
  could make anything sound weak. but a 200e is a whole lot of money and
  i don't think it would be fiscally responsible for me to take out an
  equity line on the house to get a synth. though the though has crossed
  my mind. would anyone here let a homeless guy with a 200e crash on
  their couch?

  s

  --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Joey Fedrow <v605aql@...> wrote:
  >
  > If your coming from a buchla background, I suspect you'll be sorely
  disappointed by the doepfer. You might want to just start saving for a
  200e. 
  > 
  > --- On Sun, 11/23/08, Sean Hart <dubvegan@...> wrote:
  > From: Sean Hart <dubvegan@...>
  > Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: starting a modular
  > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
  > Date: Sunday, November 23, 2008, 1:43 PM
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > my intention is to start with simple system, i will
  eventually
  > 
  > replace and add more and different osc's and have a decent variety of
  > 
  > filters. i would also add an external input/envelope follower for
  > 
  > processing external sounds. i am very fond of LFOs and the various
  > 
  > ways you can abuse them. i knew i needed a VCA and a mixer, though i
  > 
  > forgot to add them to the list.
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > and i have certainly looked at other manufactures. there are a lot of
  > 
  > really cool modules out there. this is certainly something that could
  > 
  > keep me perpetually broke.
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > thanks for the input and insight.
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > s
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > --- In Doepfer_a100@ yahoogroups. com, Bakis Sirros
  > 
  > <synth_freak_ 2000@> wrote:
  > 
  > >
  > 
  > > the A110's are nice osc's and offer good 'bung for buck' (as they
  say).
  > 
  > > they have their own sound. some like it some not.
  > 
  > > simple as that.
  > 
  > >  
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
  > 
  > > [Doepfer_a100] group owner
  > 
  > > www. parallel - worlds - music. com
  > 
  > > www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
  > 
  > > www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
  > 
  > > www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
  > 
  > > www. DiN. org. uk
  > 
  > > www. musicamaximamagneti ca. com
  > 
  > > www. shimarecords. co. uk
  > 
  > > www. rubberrecords. gr
  > 
  > > Athens - Greece
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > --- On Sun, 11/23/08, Argitoth <argitoth@ .> wrote:
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > From: Argitoth <argitoth@ .>
  > 
  > > Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] starting a modular
  > 
  > > To: Doepfer_a100@ yahoogroups. com
  > 
  > > Date: Sunday, November 23, 2008, 7:35 AM
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > York, to defend myself, I did own A-110 VCOs which I got for $150
  > 
  > > each. I sold them to buy Analog Systems VCOs for about $255 each
  > 
  > > (price includes power conversion). I should have said that it is my
  > 
  > > personal opinion that I think A-110s have low bang-for-buck. I should
  > 
  > > also say I have a very low tolerance for imperfections, so others will
  > 
  > > definitely find the A-110s suitable. Yes, they did have good pitch
  > 
  > > tracking, but for $50 more you can buy VCOs with more features.
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > I would have purchased the Tip Top VCOs in a heart beat had I known
  > 
  > > about them (but they weren't even announced when I got my VCOs). Top
  > 
  > > Top VCOs are less expensive than Analog Systems VCOs (mainly because
  > 
  > > of power conversion) and probably have some niiice features that the
  > 
  > > Analog Systems VCOs do not have.
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:01 PM, york luethje <ybl@> wrote:
  > 
  > > > Argitoth is right, no need to rush. A good starting point is
  > 
  > > >
  > 
  > > > http://mega. modularplanner. co.uk/standard. html
  > 
  > > >
  > 
  > > > There you have all current manufacturers for the eurorack-format
  > 
  > in one
  > 
  > > > comprehensive package. And you definitely should get a multiple.
  > 
  > > >
  > 
  > > > However
  > 
  > > >
  > 
  > > > "I heard that some people like to remove the spring from the Doepfer
  > 
  > > > joystick as it doesn't return back to its center with the
  spring... it
  > 
  > > > returns a bit off center which would be gay in my opinion."
  > 
  > > >
  > 
  > > > Never heard of that. Mine works fine for the best part of this
  > 
  > decade. And I
  > 
  > > > have an unsprung one as well.
  > 
  > > >
  > 
  > > > "You definitely don't want to spend money on the cheapest VCO
  (doepfer
  > 
  > > > A-110) as you'd be getting the least bang for buck."
  > 
  > > >
  > 
  > > > This kind of sentiment always struck me as a bit strange. It seems
  > 
  > to be an
  > 
  > > > article of faith amongst the cognoscenti that the A-110 is an
  inferior
  > 
  > > > product. It is not considering the price-point. My impression was
  > 
  > that the
  > 
  > > > OP had a budget of USD 2k. Sure there are other oscillators but
  > 
  > getting two
  > 
  > > > good ones for USD 400? That also track very well over a wide
  > 
  > range? And hold
  > 
  > > > their tuning no matter what, over days if need be?
  > 
  > > >
  > 
  > > > Debates over oscillators are superseded in subjective POV only by
  > 
  > > > filter-battles and I don't want to get into that. Just dislike the
  > 
  > habitual
  > 
  > > > bashing of a very competent product. Below are the OSCs I can
  > 
  > think of:
  > 
  > > > together with their prices:
  > 
  > > >
  > 
  > > > Doepfer A-110 200,-
  > 
  > > > Doepfer A-111 350,- Triangle core
  > 
  > > > Tip-Top Z-3000 250,-
  > 
  > > > Analogue Solutions 185,-
  > 
  > > > Cwejman VCO 2RM 640,- 2 VCOs + RingMod
  > 
  > > > Cwejman VCO 6 425,-
  > 
  > > > Cyindustries Zeroscillator 995,-
  > 
  > > > Metasonix TM 3 550,- 2 OSCs, not much tracking but...mmmh! Eric
  > 
  > Barbour is
  > 
  > > > God.
  > 
  > > > MFB OSC 1 220,- 3 DCOs
  > 
  > > > MFB OSC 2 299,- 3 VCOs
  > 
  > > > Plan B Model 15 320 Triangle core
  > 
  > > > Analogue Systems RS95 240,-
  > 
  > > > Livewire Dalek VCO 260,- VCO + RingMod
  > 
  > > > Livewire AFG 399,-
  > 
  > > >
  > 
  > > > Best
  > 
  > > >
  > 
  > > > York
  > 
  > > >
  > 
  > > > ____________ _________ _________ __
  > 
  > > > From: Argitoth <argitoth@gmail. com>
  > 
  > > > To: Doepfer_a100@ yahoogroups. com
  > 
  > > > Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2008 8:57:36 PM
  > 
  > > > Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] starting a modular
  > 
  > > >
  > 
  > > > I would suggest Tip Top Audio VCOs (which I don't own):
  > 
  > > > http://www.analogue haven.com/ tiptopaudio/ z3000/
  > 
  > > >
  > 
  > > > You definitely don't want to spend money on the cheapest VCO
  (doepfer
  > 
  > > > A-110) as you'd be getting the least bang for buck.
  > 
  > > >
  > 
  > > > I heard that some people like to remove the spring from the Doepfer
  > 
  > > > joystick as it doesn't return back to its center with the
  spring... it
  > 
  > > > returns a bit off center which would be gay in my opinion.
  > 
  > > >
  > 
  > > > OK! YOU REALLLLLLY HAVE TO STOP AND THINK ABOUT THIS: Really think
  > 
  > > > about how you are going to handle mixing/merging, inverting, and
  > 
  > > > splitting/multiplyi ng, and attenuating signals. Some modules have
  > 
  > > > multiple ins and multiple outs, some modules can attenuate, some
  > 
  > > > modules can't, etc. There are many options for signal routing
  modules.
  > 
  > > > I personally think the best way to go it to get mixing/merging
  modules
  > 
  > > > that don't have attenuation knobs and get one or two dedicated
  > 
  > > > attenuation modules. The reason for this is that most of the time, a
  > 
  > > > module's input has an attenuator. Signal Mixers and Multipliers that
  > 
  > > > have multiple ins/outs generally don't have attenuation knobs, but
  > 
  > > > they are extremely useful.
  > 
  > > >
  > 
  > > > http://www.noisebug .net/site/ analoguesolution s/index.cfm? id=10
  > 
  > > > http://www.noisebug .net/site/ analoguesolution s/index.cfm? id=21
  > 
  > > > http://www.noisebug .net/site/ planb/index. cfm?id=24
  > 
  > > > http://www.noisebug .net/site/ planb/index. cfm?id=18
  > 
  > > >
  > 
  > > > You need one signal multiplier that is buffered (low signal
  > 
  > > > degradation when multiplying a signal) so that you can route 1v/oct
  > 
  > > > signals to multiple oscillators, filters, and whatever else. The
  MX224
  > 
  > > > is not good enough for some reason, but it's GREAT for general
  > 
  > > > purposes. I have a Plan B Model 31 Buffered Multi in the mail so
  I'll
  > 
  > > > see if that is any better.
  > 
  > > >
  > 
  > > > An A-138c is a very useful mixer because it can invert a signal
  by any
  > 
  > > > amount. By the way, signal inversion is one way to make filters
  > 
  > > > distort and scream.
  > 
  > > >
  > 
  > > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 6:11 PM, york luethje <ybl@> wrote:
  > 
  > > >> Hi Sean,
  > 
  > > >>
  > 
  > > >> you could substitute the A-143-2 and A-143-3 with a A-143-1. It
  > 
  > gives you
  > 
  > > >> four independent AD envelopes or 4 independent LFOs or a complex
  > 
  > envelope,
  > 
  > > >> depending on mode. You should definitely think about adding some
  > 
  > VCAs, for
  > 
  > > >> example the A-132 dual VCA.
  > 
  > > >>
  > 
  > > >> York
  > 
  > > >>
  > 
  > > >> ____________ _________ _________ __
  > 
  > > >> From: Sean Hart <dubvegan@yahoo. com>
  > 
  > > >> To: Doepfer_a100@ yahoogroups. com
  > 
  > > >> Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2008 7:15:34 PM
  > 
  > > >> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] starting a modular
  > 
  > > >>
  > 
  > > >> fortunately and unfortunately, i have a friend that has a
  buchla 200.
  > 
  > > >> furtunately, because i get to play it when i visit him.
  > 
  > unfurtunately,
  > 
  > > >> because it makes me want an analogue modular ($$$). i would most
  > 
  > > >> likely have to build it a little at a time, but i am thinking:
  > 
  > > >>
  > 
  > > >> A-110 Standard VCO x 2
  > 
  > > >> A-114 Dual Ringmodulator
  > 
  > > >> A-121 Multimode Filter (VCF2)
  > 
  > > >> A-138b Mixer
  > 
  > > >> A-143-2 Quad ADSR
  > 
  > > >> A-143-3 Quad LFO
  > 
  > > >> A-174 Joy Stick
  > 
  > > >> A-190 MIDI-to-CV/Gate/ Sync Interface
  > 
  > > >> A-100 Low Cost Suitcase
  > 
  > > >>
  > 
  > > >> which would be just under $2000 (still a decent chunk of money)
  and i
  > 
  > > >> would still need cables. are there any more options for more
  > 
  > > >> economical modules? and yes, i would continue to buy more
  modules and
  > 
  > > >> i know that it is something that i would spend, in the long term,
  > 
  > > >> ridiculous amounts of money on.
  > 
  > > >>
  > 
  > > >> comments? suggestions? anything you are selling to help me
  bring the
  > 
  > > >> initial cost down?
  > 
  > > >>
  > 
  > > >> thanks,
  > 
  > > >> sean
  > 
  > > >>
  > 
  > > >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  > 
  > > >>
  > 
  > > >>
  > 
  > > >
  > 
  > > > --
  > 
  > > > www.elanhickler. com
  > 
  > > >
  > 
  > > >
  > 
  > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  > 
  > > >
  > 
  > > > 
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > -- 
  > 
  > > www.elanhickler. com
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > 
  > 
  > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  > 
  > >
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  >



   

-- 
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
We are a community of 5.6 million users fighting spam.
SPAMfighter has removed 1141 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len

The Professional version does not have this message


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.