Doepfer

Hi Dieter,
 
I have a number of pieces of equipment that produce artefacts as part of
the way CV controls digital elements and use those artefacts as part of
the composition. However I would hope that as this unit is going to be
in the 250 Euro bracket that those could be reduced to a minimum.
 
I accept that it's all about AD resolution and CPU cycles and these cost
money but the cleaner the CV transitions the better would be my opinion.
 
Thanks
 
David
 
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * *
David Salter
Senior Consultant
SSG UKI

Thomson Reuters

O +44 (0)20 7542 2402X 52402
M 07990562402

david.salter@thomsonreuters.com
thomsonreuters.com <http://thomsonreuters.com/> 
 
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

 

________________________________

From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of yahoo@doepfer.de
Sent: 08 September 2009 08:59
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] *** Tiptop Z5000 upgrade ***


  

> Hi Dieter,
>
> Now that looks really nice. Have you and the team managed to implement
> the CV controls and have no aliasing?
>
> David

We are still in negotiations with the supplier of the DSP board to
improve
the algorithms. They told us that they will improve the algorithms but
did
not promise that it will be perfect. We also realized that many
customers
are even happy with the artefacts that appear if certain parameters are
changed.

Best wishes
Dieter Doepfer






This email was sent to you by Thomson Reuters, the global news and information company.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Thomson Reuters.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]