Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Message

AW: [Doepfer_a100] Dark Time vs Oberkorn M3

2011-04-17 by York Luethje

Did you by any chance mean the Oberkorn v3? If so, the Oberkorn and the Dark
Time are not really comparable. A better match would be the Doepfer MAQ
16/3. 

 

There is a smaller sequencer from Analogue Solutions called the Station Q
that's closer to the DT. Since it is only 8 steps and lacks MIDI this will
be not as good a fit for your needs as the Dark Time. 

 

The DT should be easy to integrate with Logic. It is also pretty
straightforward: Gate and CV output, either 2x8 or 1x16 steps, forward,
backward and random. 

 

As for experimental potential I don't know. Define experimental. I would
think that the Oberkorn or the MAQ are better bets here (or the A 155 / 154
combo if you plan on going modular). 

 

  _____  

Von: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com] Im
Auftrag von malcolm
Gesendet: Samstag, 16. April 2011 23:41
An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Betreff: [Doepfer_a100] Dark Time vs Oberkorn M3

 

  

Hello All,

I'm new to hardware sequencing and am trying to decide between buying the
Doepfer Dark Time and the Oberkorn M3 a my first hardware sequencer!

What I'm looking for...

- sequence midi and cv enabled hardware synths and maybe soft synths

- easy integration with Logic as the 'master' clock

- maximum tweakability and experimental potential

- relatively east to understand - although I'm not afraid of a learning
curve

I do not currently own a CV-MIDI converter

Any advice or opinions are much appreciated!

Best,
Malcolm, NYC





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.