I am always wondering why no center detent pots were used on the polarizers in Doepfer modules.
I know this is more expensive... but still...
Ernst
I know this is more expensive... but still...
Ernst
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Neil Kagan blinkenlicht@yahoo.com [Doepfer_a100] <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Yes!! Brilliant idea :)
Sent from my iPhone
On 5 Feb 2015, at 10:01, Martin Fay martin@martinfay.com [Doepfer_a100] <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> wrote:Dieter, is the A-133 implemented with "back-to-back" VCAs? If so a handy improvement for a future A-133-2 would be a switch to select negative/both/positive (or just both/positive only would be very nearly as useful).Also a sum output, or normal the upper output to the lower output would be nice.And normal +5V to the inputs so that the units can be used as offsets.Martin
Sent from my iPhone
On 5 Feb 2015, at 07:54, "Neil Kagan blinkenlicht@yahoo.com [Doepfer_a100]" <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> wrote:If it's like the A-133, I find the 'zero' point to be very small. Same with the Polarizing mixer.Neil
Sent from my iPhone
On 5 Feb 2015, at 03:14, raulpena1974@yahoo.com [Doepfer_a100] <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> wrote:Hello. I am doing a series on the A106-5. I read that the CV2 is a polarized input so around 12 o' clock the cv input is at zero, at +5 it is at fully positive input, and at -5 it is an inverted version of the cv input.
As long as I understand this correctly, at zero I should have no cv but when I input an envelope it does affect the cutoff a slight amount.
Can anyone confirm this behavior or explain if I am misunderstanding something?
Thanks for any help.
Raul