Doepfer

Right.  I've done one last image 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/files/offset_module_2.jpg)
, that incorporates a CV function in the lower channel.

I'm not convinced that using a rotary selector knob (ala the Range 
selector on the VCO's), as it would probably drive the price up.

Also, if the module was made wider and more complex, the development 
costs woule rise, as would the retail price.  

The way I see it, not every module should be all singing and all 
dancing.  Sometimes simple "meat and potato" modules, which are often 
relatively inexpensive to develop and manufacture, fund the 
development of the more exotic modules.

Regards,
Kevin


--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Lindholm" 
<andreas.k.lindholm@t...> wrote:
> Not a bad idea. Can you also manage to squeeze in an input for 
voltage
> controlled attenuation on the lower "channel" on the advanced 
version? or
> perhaps make the advaced module a bit wider and cram in all 
features on
> both?
> 
> The alterantive to that is to have the advanced version look more 
like the
> rest of the doepfer range that is a range selector, a attenuate 
level knob,
> the offset knob and one cv input jack for attenuation and one cv 
inputjack
> for the offset. And to top that of one input for the input signal 
on the top
> and two output of the attenuated signal att the bottom and your 
nice LEDs.
> This of course means that the CVcontrolled-attenuator will be just 
a single
> channel attenuator, but a complex one.
>