Sorry, but the correct link is http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/files/offset_module_3.jpg Regards, Kevin --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "code_pig" <code_pig@y...> wrote: > Right. I've done one last image > (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/files/offset_module_2.jpg) > , that incorporates a CV function in the lower channel. > > I'm not convinced that using a rotary selector knob (ala the Range > selector on the VCO's), as it would probably drive the price up. > > Also, if the module was made wider and more complex, the development > costs woule rise, as would the retail price. > > The way I see it, not every module should be all singing and all > dancing. Sometimes simple "meat and potato" modules, which are often > relatively inexpensive to develop and manufacture, fund the > development of the more exotic modules. > > Regards, > Kevin > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Lindholm" > <andreas.k.lindholm@t...> wrote: > > Not a bad idea. Can you also manage to squeeze in an input for > voltage > > controlled attenuation on the lower "channel" on the advanced > version? or > > perhaps make the advaced module a bit wider and cram in all > features on > > both? > > > > The alterantive to that is to have the advanced version look more > like the > > rest of the doepfer range that is a range selector, a attenuate > level knob, > > the offset knob and one cv input jack for attenuation and one cv > inputjack > > for the offset. And to top that of one input for the input signal > on the top > > and two output of the attenuated signal att the bottom and your > nice LEDs. > > This of course means that the CVcontrolled-attenuator will be just > a single > > channel attenuator, but a complex one. > >
Message
Re: The definition of a new attenuator
2003-03-26 by code_pig
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.