Doepfer

hello antonio,

the missing lows in #5 are probably because the
cgs real ring is a passive device, the output
loudness is weak on this module.
i haven't amplified the module output to show
the differences in loudness.

dsp-based ring modulators are not really interesting
for me. i built lots of such stuff in reaktor but the
result was always much too clean, too digital-sounding.

best wishes

ingo



--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "atuzzi" <antoniotuzzi@t...> 
wrote:
>
> Hi Ingo,
> 
> thanks, great comparison
> 
> you should add a DSP style ring modulator too, just too see the
> deviation from the "pure" mathematical creation (something like 
CSound
> or MAX or the pick your flavour).
> 
> I must say the more dramatic is #3
> And I don't understand the missing lows in the #5 (the mp3 
compression ?)
> 
> thank you
> at
> 
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "selfoscillate"
> <synaptic_music@y...> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > hello,
> > 
> > yesterday i modded an a114 like suggested
> > by peter and tim. when testing the device
> > i compared it with other ringmodulators.
> > here is a short recording to show the
> > timbral differences and also the varying
> > loudness.
> > 
> > http://www.selfoscillate.de/a100files/ringmods-sequence.mp3
> > 
> > file size: 429 kb
> > 
> > all ring modulators use the same audio sources
> > (sinewaves from two a111, each vco's pitch is
> > controlled by it's own sequencer row).
> > 
> > 1. a114 original
> > 2. a114 tim's mod (c1 shorted)
> > 3. a114 peter's mod (c2 shorted)
> > 4. blacet klangwerk
> > 5. cgs real ring modulator
> > 
> > 
> > best wishes
> > 
> > ingo
> >
>