Doepfer

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "selfoscillate" 
<synaptic_music@y...> wrote:
>
> 
> hello antonio,
> 
> the missing lows in #5 are probably because the
> cgs real ring is a passive device, the output
> loudness is weak on this module.

Just want to add that the RRM is known to load the VCOs and thus 
affecting their performance. The results would be different if the 
inputs of the RRM were buffered. One could add an Op Amp to each 
input or (if I'm not mistaken) 2 Analogue Solutions' MX224 
Mixer/Buffer Modules. Obviously the latter is not very economical. 
Regards, Ingo
> 
> 
> 
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "atuzzi" <antoniotuzzi@t...> 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ingo,
> > 
> > thanks, great comparison
> > 
> > you should add a DSP style ring modulator too, just too see the
> > deviation from the "pure" mathematical creation (something like 
> CSound
> > or MAX or the pick your flavour).
> > 
> > I must say the more dramatic is #3
> > And I don't understand the missing lows in the #5 (the mp3 
> compression ?)
> > 
> > thank you
> > at
> > 
> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "selfoscillate"
> > <synaptic_music@y...> wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > hello,
> > > 
> > > yesterday i modded an a114 like suggested
> > > by peter and tim. when testing the device
> > > i compared it with other ringmodulators.
> > > here is a short recording to show the
> > > timbral differences and also the varying
> > > loudness.
> > > 
> > > http://www.selfoscillate.de/a100files/ringmods-sequence.mp3
> > > 
> > > file size: 429 kb
> > > 
> > > all ring modulators use the same audio sources
> > > (sinewaves from two a111, each vco's pitch is
> > > controlled by it's own sequencer row).
> > > 
> > > 1. a114 original
> > > 2. a114 tim's mod (c1 shorted)
> > > 3. a114 peter's mod (c2 shorted)
> > > 4. blacet klangwerk
> > > 5. cgs real ring modulator
> > > 
> > > 
> > > best wishes
> > > 
> > > ingo
> > >
> >
>