it's really easy to assemble one or two cgs ringmods from the assembled boards you can buy, just take an 8 hp blindplate, drill 6 8.2mm holes for the s6 sockets, hot-glue the two cgs boards to the plate (the transformer's "casing" allow this quite smoothly), wire the sockets, done. it's a lovely ringmod. if you feed it with a high-power sine from i.e. a testsignal generator (like a heathkit) and a microphone thru preamp, you can get the exact sound of the imperial probe droid in The Empire Strikes Back...Looooovely :-) cheers, denis Am 15.11.2005 um 18:09 schrieb Zoran Bosnjak: > Ingo, > > thank you so much for the example! I like the CGS ring module the > most. What > a pity it is not offered assembled. I still have to get the soldering > lesson > #1 before trying to figure it out myself... (Does anybody offer basic > electronics course in Montreal?) > > Regards, > > Zoran > > >> From: "selfoscillate" <synaptic_music@yahoo.com> >> Reply-To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com >> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com >> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: comparing ring modulators >> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:38:39 -0000 >> >> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "ilanode" <techmeier@w...> wrote: >>> >>> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "selfoscillate" >>> <synaptic_music@y...> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> hello antonio, >>>> >>>> the missing lows in #5 are probably because the >>>> cgs real ring is a passive device, the output >>>> loudness is weak on this module. >>> >>> Just want to add that the RRM is known to load the VCOs and thus >>> affecting their performance. The results would be different if the >>> inputs of the RRM were buffered. One could add an Op Amp to each >>> input or (if I'm not mistaken) 2 Analogue Solutions' MX224 >>> Mixer/Buffer Modules. Obviously the latter is not very economical. >>> Regards, Ingo >> >> >> i usually use those mx224 buffers in front of the cgs real ring, >> but i didn't in my example, because i wanted to show the >> significant differences of the loudness. >> anyway, if you use those buffers, the output level of >> the cgs real ring is still much lower than on the other >> ring modulators. >> >> best wishes >> >> ingo >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > >
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: comparing ring modulators
2005-11-16 by denis goekdag
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.