--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, denis goekdag <q-art@g...> wrote: > > it's really easy to assemble one or two cgs ringmods from the assembled > boards you can buy, just take an 8 hp blindplate, drill 6 8.2mm holes > for the s6 sockets, hot-glue the two cgs boards to the plate (the > transformer's "casing" allow this quite smoothly), wire the sockets, > done. Yes, probably the most simple DIY project around. The most complicated part is to get in touch with Ken of CGS at least he has never replied to my mails. :( Ingo > Am 15.11.2005 um 18:09 schrieb Zoran Bosnjak: > > > > Ingo, > > > > thank you so much for the example! I like the CGS ring module the > > most. What > > a pity it is not offered assembled. I still have to get the soldering > > lesson > > #1 before trying to figure it out myself... (Does anybody offer basic > > electronics course in Montreal?) > > > > Regards, > > > > Zoran > > > > > >> From: "selfoscillate" <synaptic_music@y...> > >> Reply-To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > >> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > >> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: comparing ring modulators > >> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:38:39 -0000 > >> > >> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "ilanode" <techmeier@w...> wrote: > >>> > >>> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "selfoscillate" > >>> <synaptic_music@y...> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> hello antonio, > >>>> > >>>> the missing lows in #5 are probably because the > >>>> cgs real ring is a passive device, the output > >>>> loudness is weak on this module. > >>> > >>> Just want to add that the RRM is known to load the VCOs and thus > >>> affecting their performance. The results would be different if the > >>> inputs of the RRM were buffered. One could add an Op Amp to each > >>> input or (if I'm not mistaken) 2 Analogue Solutions' MX224 > >>> Mixer/Buffer Modules. Obviously the latter is not very economical. > >>> Regards, Ingo > >> > >> > >> i usually use those mx224 buffers in front of the cgs real ring, > >> but i didn't in my example, because i wanted to show the > >> significant differences of the loudness. > >> anyway, if you use those buffers, the output level of > >> the cgs real ring is still much lower than on the other > >> ring modulators. > >> > >> best wishes > >> > >> ingo > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Message
Re: comparing ring modulators
2005-11-16 by ilanode
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.