Doepfer

From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of selfoscillate
Sent: 13 September 2006 16:14
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: New poll for Doepfer_a100




thanks for clearing out on the price differences, dieter.

i have edited the poll text to reflect that,
but i didn't know that this would delete the
already given votes.

i'm sorry about that, but there were only three votes
given anyway, so i hope that it was not a too bad mistake.

those three voters, please accept my apologies and vote again.

many thanks

best wishes

ingo

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> , <hardware@...> wrote:
>
> Thank's for the poll.
> 
> I hove some comments concerning the prices of the different options:
> 
> The rotary switches used in the A-110 and A-111 are very expensive 
parts.
> Consequently:
> 
> 1. Three toggle switches for octave selection (1, 2, 4 octaves) 
would be
> about the same as the rotary switch
> 2. Even the multiturn potentiometer will be in the same price range 
as the
> rotary switch
> 
> Option 1 would be the cheapest solution as neither a rotary switch 
nor a
> multiturn potentiometer is used.
> All other option are approximately in the same price range.
> By far the most expensive solution is those with rotary switch and 
multiturn
> potentiometer.
> 
> I'm very interested in the winner. I'd recommend version .... - 
no, I don't
> want to influence your votes.
> 
> Best wishes
> Dieter Doepfer
> 
> 
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>  
[mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> ]
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. September 2006 16:26
> > An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> 
> > Betreff: [Doepfer_a100] New poll for Doepfer_a100
> >
> >
> >
> > Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
> > Doepfer_a100 group:
> >
> > which tuning controls would you prefer for the forthcoming
> > a111/2 dynamic vco?
> >
> > o coarse freq pot with extended range + fine freq pot (like on
> > the preliminary frontpanel)
> > o coarse freq pot with standard range + fine freq pot + rotary
> > octave switch (like a111)
> > o coarse freq pot with extended range + fine freq pot + rotary
> > octave switch
> > o coarse freq pot with three-position switch to select the knob
> > range + fine freq pot + rotary octave switch
> > o coarse freq pot with jumper on the pcb to select the knob
> > range + fine freq pot + rotary octave switch
> > o coarse freq pot with extended range + fine freq pot + a set
> > of buttons to select the octaves (probably more expensive)
> > o coarse freq pot with extended range + fine freq multiturn pot
> > + rotary octave switch (probably more expensive)
> > o only one bigger multiturn pot with extended range (probably
> > more expensive)
> > o i'm fine with any of the cheaper solutions (1 - 5)
> > o i'm fine with any of these solutions
> >
> >
> > To vote, please visit the following web page:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/surveys?id=12420582 <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/surveys?id=12420582> 
> >
> > Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
> > not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
> > web site listed above.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>



 


This email was sent to you by Reuters, the global news and information company. 
To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]