I'm not going to add more heat to this discussion than already is, but I have a few thoughts.... As a mere hobby-musician (Fairlight-less I may add) I can't help think that there might be a distinction between "a Fairlight sound" (an instantly recognizable Fairlight preset such as the "Orch5" orchestra hit, or that Fairlight voice which I asked about previously) and "that Fairlight sound" meaning a particular audio characteristic instantly recognizable by those who hear it (regardless of a Fairlight preset being used or not). Having said that, speaking for myself (naturally) I can't say that I've been able to know when a Fairlight has been used on a record and when a non-Fairlight sampler using a Fairlight preset has been used. I just happen to think that some of those legendary presets are quite cool (which other here say are crap) and I don't care where they come from as long as I like the song. But who am I to speak -I don't own a Fairlight, I'm not a professional musician, don't work in a studio as an engineer/producer, nor have I owned every hardware sampler there is, so I can compare ;-) On a sidenote, I'm very curious about the Fairlight (which is why I joined this group) and would like to know what those CMI III sounds are, which everybody is talking about here. I already have the CMI IIx sampling CD (audio-CD which is a pain, as opposed to a data CD with ready-to-use AIFF samples), and recognized many of them, but I'm not sure if I've heard any CMI III samples (or perhaps I have without knowing it). Hallvard
Message
Re: [Fairlight-CMI] Re: Series III Library availability
2006-12-15 by Hallvard Tangeraas
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.