Yahoo Groups archive

Fairlight-CMI

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:03 UTC

Thread

test

test

2014-05-10 by Jean-Bernard EMOND

test

Re: [Fairlight-CMI] test

2014-05-10 by Att

received

Sent from my iPhone
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> On May 10, 2014, at 4:06 AM, "Jean-Bernard EMOND jbemond@free.fr [Fairlight-CMI]" <Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> 
> test
>

Re: [Fairlight-CMI] test

2014-05-10 by Josin

Not a test

Have unsubscribed from this money minded group...

Sent from my iPad
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> On 10 May 2014, at 15:12, "Att glenn234@pacbell.net [Fairlight-CMI]" <Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> 
> received
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On May 10, 2014, at 4:06 AM, "Jean-Bernard EMOND jbemond@free.fr [Fairlight-CMI]" <Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>> 
>>  
>> test
> 
>

Re: [Fairlight-CMI] test

2014-05-10 by Att

Money-minded?

Sent from my iPhone
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> On May 10, 2014, at 8:44 AM, "Josin josin.miranda@btinternet.com [Fairlight-CMI]" <Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> 
> Not a test
> 
> Have unsubscribed from this money minded group...
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On 10 May 2014, at 15:12, "Att glenn234@pacbell.net [Fairlight-CMI]" <Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>> 
>>  
>> received
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On May 10, 2014, at 4:06 AM, "Jean-Bernard EMOND jbemond@free.fr [Fairlight-CMI]" <Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>  
>>> test
> 
>

Re: [Fairlight-CMI] test

2014-06-02 by phantom_of_paradyse@hotmail.com

Yes I agree with you, some people are here only to make business, only going there to find parts, asking some infos and selling their cmi , I don' t speak for Peter Wielk , JB or RY , they are pro and don' t hesitate to use their soldering iron to bring back a cmi to life.
This is a huge problem for Fairlight
community as they disassemble a cmi that might be easily fixed with a good engineer to fix an other Fairlight , this reduce the number of existing Fairlight .

Re: test

2014-06-02 by linear226@excite.com

that all sounds a bit sanctimonious, I think you'll find all high end manufacturers spares are both rare and therefore sell at a premium, such as SSL, Synclavier, Neve etc. I know of several dealers that buy large SSL consoles and strip them out for spares because firstly in some cases it makes more sense financially and second many end users need spares and will continue to do so.



Re: test

2014-06-02 by phantom_of_paradyse@hotmail.com

As you say, those are dealers, and we don' t want them in Fairlight communauty, their motivation is only money and that' s never positive . We have enough of good guys to fix problems ! Nobody should disassemble a cmi just to get 2 cards. CMI are so few that we have to keep their integrity . Cmi price are getting higher because there is less of units available. Further mixing cards between revisions is a complete no sens, this bring buggy systems

Re: [Fairlight-CMI] test

2014-06-03 by Joe Sleator

Good point! More healthy CMIs is more health for the community. It always saddens me when someone splits their previously functioning (or nearly functioning) CMI into parts and sells them, even if I happen to need parts sometimes. They are extremely robust for a piece of vintage electronics, and built and engineered very solidly. What goes wrong with them is often quite minor.

Joe

Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:21 PM, phantom_of_paradyse@hotmail.com [Fairlight-CMI] <Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Yes I agree with you, some people are here only to make business, only going there to find parts, asking some infos and selling their cmi , I don' t speak for Peter Wielk , JB or RY , they are pro and don' t hesitate to use their soldering iron to bring back a cmi to life.
This is a huge problem for Fairlight
community as they disassemble a cmi that might be easily fixed with a good engineer to fix an other Fairlight , this reduce the number of existing Fairlight .


Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.