Yahoo Groups archive

Homebrew PCBs

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:05 UTC

Thread

Nickel and Silver Print from MG for through hole plating

Nickel and Silver Print from MG for through hole plating

2010-07-30 by morarcalin

MG Chemicals has two conductive prints that they claim can be used for  hole plating. Like I said "they claim" :)) ... so no idea if they really work. That's why I am asking first.

One of them is Nickel Print (around 11$ for 3/4oz) and  second is Silver Print (around 35$ for 3/4oz). The difference is in the conductivity, obviously the nickel one being less conductive. MG is saying that they can be used for hole plating. 

I am curious if anyone has tried any these two? If it really works for sure will make life a lot easier for DYI-ers like us. 

I think using first the nickel one to "pre-plate" and then electroplate or just thin plate with liquid tin to make the soldering work better may do the trick ..... I am not talking doing production work, just to get prototyping easier. 

Calin

Re: Nickel and Silver Print from MG for through hole plating

2010-07-30 by Athar Kaludi

Calin
Go ahead with Nickel print as trial if you can afford.
Conductive paints work as the word specify. Your purpose will solve, but only for prototyping purpose
What i mean by saying this is that the time required in conducting each hole takes your hours of effort, but you learn a lot more for future.
I am sure that you have that much energy which drives you to ready your prototype. That's the result you are waiting for. Good Luck

Athar Kaludi
Premium PCB Manufacturing
Pakistan


--- On Fri, 7/30/10, morarcalin <morarcalin@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: morarcalin <morarcalin@...>
Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Nickel and Silver Print from MG for through hole plating
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, July 30, 2010, 11:41 AM







 



  


    
      
      
      MG Chemicals has two conductive prints that they claim can be used for  hole plating. Like I said "they claim" :)) ... so no idea if they really work. That's why I am asking first.



One of them is Nickel Print (around 11$ for 3/4oz) and  second is Silver Print (around 35$ for 3/4oz). The difference is in the conductivity, obviously the nickel one being less conductive. MG is saying that they can be used for hole plating. 



I am curious if anyone has tried any these two? If it really works for sure will make life a lot easier for DYI-ers like us. 



I think using first the nickel one to "pre-plate" and then electroplate or just thin plate with liquid tin to make the soldering work better may do the trick ..... I am not talking doing production work, just to get prototyping easier. 



Calin





    
     

    
    


 



  






      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Nickel and Silver Print from MG for through hole plating

2010-08-17 by morarcalin

Here is the update regarding Nickel Print - NO SUCCESS

So I went ahead and bought a jar of "Nickel print" - 13$ - all good till I open the jar - completely dried out. So I use some paint tinner and leave the thing to melt for about 3 days. I guess was just plain bad luck I got this really old evaporated stuff.

After 3 days I finally got something that resembled nail polish - hmm not bad!!! So I etch one my ARM breakout boards. I use Stellaris LM3S308 MCU - which is a 48 LQFP package with 0.5 pitch (yes I solder these by hand :)). The board has about 15 vias that are pretty big - 50mils pad and 10mil holes.  

First I drilled the holes (carbide at 35K RPM)... then I scotch taped the board both sides (it is a double sided board) and deburred all holes (same drill at only 5K RPM). This has left me with all 15 via holes punched thorough the scotch tape and very clean.I checked each one a microscope so I can say all were very clean. 

Then smudged a blob of nickel print and squeegeed the stuff around the board till was dripping on the other side. While I was doing this the nickel has started to dry already (nothing abnormal yet but this does dry very fast).  

Vacuum the board on the other side. 

Then "baked" at around 90C for 30min. 

Took the board out.. and did some continuity testing. Surprise .. ABSOLUTE FAILURE !!! from 15 holes only 2 were conductive. 

Now, either I am doing something wrong either the Nikel Print is a advertising hype "by MG Chemichals" :)) . Or my Nikel was bad ... I mean too old. 

Do you guys have any other idea? I have nickel left so I can try some other technique.

C


--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Athar Kaludi <ceo_premium@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Calin
> Go ahead with Nickel print as trial if you can afford.
> Conductive paints work as the word specify. Your purpose will solve, but only for prototyping purpose
> What i mean by saying this is that the time required in conducting each hole takes your hours of effort, but you learn a lot more for future.
> I am sure that you have that much energy which drives you to ready your prototype. That's the result you are waiting for. Good Luck
> 
> Athar Kaludi
> Premium PCB Manufacturing
> Pakistan
> 
> 
> --- On Fri, 7/30/10, morarcalin <morarcalin@...> wrote:
> 
> From: morarcalin <morarcalin@...>
> Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Nickel and Silver Print from MG for through hole plating
> To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Friday, July 30, 2010, 11:41 AM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Â 
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
>     
>       
>       
>       MG Chemicals has two conductive prints that they claim can be used for  hole plating. Like I said "they claim" :)) ... so no idea if they really work. That's why I am asking first.
> 
> 
> 
> One of them is Nickel Print (around 11$ for 3/4oz) and  second is Silver Print (around 35$ for 3/4oz). The difference is in the conductivity, obviously the nickel one being less conductive. MG is saying that they can be used for hole plating. 
> 
> 
> 
> I am curious if anyone has tried any these two? If it really works for sure will make life a lot easier for DYI-ers like us. 
> 
> 
> 
> I think using first the nickel one to "pre-plate" and then electroplate or just thin plate with liquid tin to make the soldering work better may do the trick ..... I am not talking doing production work, just to get prototyping easier. 
> 
> 
> 
> Calin
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     
>      
> 
>     
>     
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Nickel and Silver Print from MG for through hole plating

2010-08-17 by Donald H Locker

Sorry to hear of your lack of success.

It might have been the thinner, though.  MG Chemicals says "If thinning is required use M.G. Thinner (Cat. No. 435-55ML)."  I looked that up and its MSDS sheet lists ingredients as 

CAS  67-64-1  2-propanone  85 - 95%
CAS 108-65-6  1-methoxy-2-propanol acetate  5 - 15%

This formula is pretty simple but definitely not paint thinner.  Many paint thinners cure (oxidise and polymerise) rather than evaporate.  MG's thinner is definitely designed to evaporate and leave the metal flake behind.  I suspect all the nickel bits are being coated by the paint thinner residue, so the body of the material is non-conductive.

Donald.
--
"Plain Text" email -- it's an accessibility issue
()  no proprietary attachments; no html mail
/\  ascii ribbon campaign - <www.asciiribbon.org>

----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> From: "morarcalin" <morarcalin@...>
> To: "Homebrew PCBs" <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 1:44:02 AM
> Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Nickel and Silver Print from MG for through hole plating
> 
> Here is the update regarding Nickel Print - NO SUCCESS
> 
> So I went ahead and bought a jar of "Nickel print" - 13$ - all good
> till I open the jar - completely dried out. So I use some paint tinner
> and leave the thing to melt for about 3 days. I guess was just plain
> bad luck I got this really old evaporated stuff.
> 
> After 3 days I finally got something that resembled nail polish - hmm
> not bad!!! So I etch one my ARM breakout boards. I use Stellaris
> LM3S308 MCU - which is a 48 LQFP package with 0.5 pitch (yes I solder
> these by hand :)). The board has about 15 vias that are pretty big -
> 50mils pad and 10mil holes.  
> 
> First I drilled the holes (carbide at 35K RPM)... then I scotch taped
> the board both sides (it is a double sided board) and deburred all
> holes (same drill at only 5K RPM). This has left me with all 15 via
> holes punched thorough the scotch tape and very clean.I checked each
> one a microscope so I can say all were very clean. 
> 
> Then smudged a blob of nickel print and squeegeed the stuff around the
> board till was dripping on the other side. While I was doing this the
> nickel has started to dry already (nothing abnormal yet but this does
> dry very fast).  
> 
> Vacuum the board on the other side. 
> 
> Then "baked" at around 90C for 30min. 
> 
> Took the board out.. and did some continuity testing. Surprise ..
> ABSOLUTE FAILURE !!! from 15 holes only 2 were conductive. 
> 
> Now, either I am doing something wrong either the Nikel Print is a
> advertising hype "by MG Chemichals" :)) . Or my Nikel was bad ... I
> mean too old. 
> 
> Do you guys have any other idea? I have nickel left so I can try some
> other technique.
> 
> C
> 
> 
> --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Athar Kaludi <ceo_premium@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > Calin
> > Go ahead with Nickel print as trial if you can afford.
> > Conductive paints work as the word specify. Your purpose will solve,
> but only for prototyping purpose
> > What i mean by saying this is that the time required in conducting
> each hole takes your hours of effort, but you learn a lot more for
> future.
> > I am sure that you have that much energy which drives you to ready
> your prototype. That's the result you are waiting for. Good Luck
> > 
> > Athar Kaludi
> > Premium PCB Manufacturing
> > Pakistan
> > 
> > 
> > --- On Fri, 7/30/10, morarcalin <morarcalin@...> wrote:
> > 
> > From: morarcalin <morarcalin@...>
> > Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Nickel and Silver Print from MG for through
> hole plating
> > To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Friday, July 30, 2010, 11:41 AM
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Â 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   
> > 
> > 
> >     
> >       
> >       
> >       MG Chemicals has two conductive prints that they claim can be
> used for  hole plating. Like I said "they claim" :)) ... so no idea if
> they really work. That's why I am asking first.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > One of them is Nickel Print (around 11$ for 3/4oz) and  second is
> Silver Print (around 35$ for 3/4oz). The difference is in the
> conductivity, obviously the nickel one being less conductive. MG is
> saying that they can be used for hole plating. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I am curious if anyone has tried any these two? If it really works
> for sure will make life a lot easier for DYI-ers like us. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I think using first the nickel one to "pre-plate" and then
> electroplate or just thin plate with liquid tin to make the soldering
> work better may do the trick ..... I am not talking doing production
> work, just to get prototyping easier. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Calin
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >     
> >      
> > 
> >     
> >     
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >       
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and
> Photos:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
>

Re: Nickel and Silver Print from MG for through hole plating

2010-08-17 by morarcalin

I am really not very sure why but here is what I found. 

Before doing the board I tested first on a sheet of paper (just did a 3 inch long trace) to see if indeed it is conductive. And yes .. it is conductive. Not when is wet but after it dries is pretty good (obviously I did it after the thing was melted again - so my tinner was in it) 

I checked again the board under microscope, the thing is either scratched of the hole walls, either it dried out "bumpy" instead of nice smooth. This is very inconsistent anyways - some holes were a nice coat some not (like 50/50) - but then the thing was not adhering to the coper layer for others. Probably that's what I messed up using "standard" tinner - surface adhesion - or it was too thick to flow and dry in a smooth coat. 

Not giving up just yet. I will do one more try. This time I will dilute a tad more and agitate the nickel as much as I can. To me looks like it was not fluid and homogeneous enough to be smooth like an ink.

One thing is sure - "Nickel Print != conductive ink" :)) . 

C



--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Donald H Locker <dhlocker@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Sorry to hear of your lack of success.
> 
> It might have been the thinner, though.  MG Chemicals says "If thinning is required use M.G. Thinner (Cat. No. 435-55ML)."  I looked that up and its MSDS sheet lists ingredients as 
> 
> CAS  67-64-1  2-propanone  85 - 95%
> CAS 108-65-6  1-methoxy-2-propanol acetate  5 - 15%
> 
> This formula is pretty simple but definitely not paint thinner.  Many paint thinners cure (oxidise and polymerise) rather than evaporate.  MG's thinner is definitely designed to evaporate and leave the metal flake behind.  I suspect all the nickel bits are being coated by the paint thinner residue, so the body of the material is non-conductive.
> 
> Donald.
> --
> "Plain Text" email -- it's an accessibility issue
> ()  no proprietary attachments; no html mail
> /\  ascii ribbon campaign - <www.asciiribbon.org>
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> 
> > From: "morarcalin" <morarcalin@...>
> > To: "Homebrew PCBs" <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 1:44:02 AM
> > Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Nickel and Silver Print from MG for through hole plating
> > 
> > Here is the update regarding Nickel Print - NO SUCCESS
> > 
> > So I went ahead and bought a jar of "Nickel print" - 13$ - all good
> > till I open the jar - completely dried out. So I use some paint tinner
> > and leave the thing to melt for about 3 days. I guess was just plain
> > bad luck I got this really old evaporated stuff.
> > 
> > After 3 days I finally got something that resembled nail polish - hmm
> > not bad!!! So I etch one my ARM breakout boards. I use Stellaris
> > LM3S308 MCU - which is a 48 LQFP package with 0.5 pitch (yes I solder
> > these by hand :)). The board has about 15 vias that are pretty big -
> > 50mils pad and 10mil holes.  
> > 
> > First I drilled the holes (carbide at 35K RPM)... then I scotch taped
> > the board both sides (it is a double sided board) and deburred all
> > holes (same drill at only 5K RPM). This has left me with all 15 via
> > holes punched thorough the scotch tape and very clean.I checked each
> > one a microscope so I can say all were very clean. 
> > 
> > Then smudged a blob of nickel print and squeegeed the stuff around the
> > board till was dripping on the other side. While I was doing this the
> > nickel has started to dry already (nothing abnormal yet but this does
> > dry very fast).  
> > 
> > Vacuum the board on the other side. 
> > 
> > Then "baked" at around 90C for 30min. 
> > 
> > Took the board out.. and did some continuity testing. Surprise ..
> > ABSOLUTE FAILURE !!! from 15 holes only 2 were conductive. 
> > 
> > Now, either I am doing something wrong either the Nikel Print is a
> > advertising hype "by MG Chemichals" :)) . Or my Nikel was bad ... I
> > mean too old. 
> > 
> > Do you guys have any other idea? I have nickel left so I can try some
> > other technique.
> > 
> > C
> > 
> > 
> > --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Athar Kaludi <ceo_premium@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Calin
> > > Go ahead with Nickel print as trial if you can afford.
> > > Conductive paints work as the word specify. Your purpose will solve,
> > but only for prototyping purpose
> > > What i mean by saying this is that the time required in conducting
> > each hole takes your hours of effort, but you learn a lot more for
> > future.
> > > I am sure that you have that much energy which drives you to ready
> > your prototype. That's the result you are waiting for. Good Luck
> > > 
> > > Athar Kaludi
> > > Premium PCB Manufacturing
> > > Pakistan
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- On Fri, 7/30/10, morarcalin <morarcalin@> wrote:
> > > 
> > > From: morarcalin <morarcalin@>
> > > Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Nickel and Silver Print from MG for through
> > hole plating
> > > To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
> > > Date: Friday, July 30, 2010, 11:41 AM
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   
> > > 
> > > 
> > >     
> > >       
> > >       
> > >       MG Chemicals has two conductive prints that they claim can be
> > used for  hole plating. Like I said "they claim" :)) ... so no idea if
> > they really work. That's why I am asking first.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > One of them is Nickel Print (around 11$ for 3/4oz) and  second is
> > Silver Print (around 35$ for 3/4oz). The difference is in the
> > conductivity, obviously the nickel one being less conductive. MG is
> > saying that they can be used for hole plating. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I am curious if anyone has tried any these two? If it really works
> > for sure will make life a lot easier for DYI-ers like us. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I think using first the nickel one to "pre-plate" and then
> > electroplate or just thin plate with liquid tin to make the soldering
> > work better may do the trick ..... I am not talking doing production
> > work, just to get prototyping easier. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Calin
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >     
> > >      
> > > 
> > >     
> > >     
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >       
> > > 
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------
> > 
> > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and
> > Photos:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> > 
> >
>

Re: Nickel and Silver Print from MG for through hole plating

2010-08-20 by morarcalin

Here is the second try result. 

This time it covered better the via holes, especially the one in the large pads - talking about headers rows etc - 20 mils holes.

What I did:
 - etch the board (toner transfer - no need to explain)
 - scotch tape over
 - drill (again check every hole to be clean and deburr) 
 - squeegee nickel print on one side then vacuum on the other
 - do same on the other side (so I did both sides)
 - take scotch off
 - bake 
 - test (big holes good, small holes less than 50%)

This time I made the print more fluid (almost like ink). Indeed no big chunks anymore in the big holes (20 mils), the through vias (10 mils).. still clog. I believe the nickel it dries way too fast.

Tin plate ... TIN does not adheres to the nickel as I expected so the board looks ugly (but who cares if it works). But the same happens with solder. I think you need real copper electroplating. 

Overall I think this Nickel thing is not worth the fight. Maybe Silver Print :)) ... but that is 40$ a tiny jar. 


Final verdict.. this Nickel thing is getting on my nerves :)) and is messy.

I will stick for now with the copper wire soldered and then cut flush. If I am in the mood to make it look good I polish the solder joint with a soft stone to make it even more flush. This polishing thing does makes the through vias look darn nice, but you can imagine is a time killer :)) 




 



--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, DJ Delorie <dj@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> In the video tutorials I've seen of similar products, they squeegie and 
> vaccum from *both* sides - first side A to side B, then side B to side A.
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.