On May 22, 2006, at 1:32 PM, GAmoore@... wrote: > Thats great, how do you happen to have both? They are demos. I'm still deciding. Serato's demo requires an iLok and is limited time. Izotope's doesn't but adds silence every minute or something. > Hey can you make two more tests? One thing is to slow down a pop piece > in an extreme way - say a 6th or even octave. I tried slowing a vocal part by 20%, and it sounded great in both. I'll try again but by 40%. I thought the real tough task would be slowing it down AND raising pitch. There everything faltered, because I couldn't get the harmonic correction to work. Both progs just show up in Logics Time Machine as alternate algorithms. But when I turn on Harmonic Correction, I get an error message. I don't know if that's because that isn't implemented, or if there is some failsafe where it can only be used with a small range of change. Radius has a popup control window with additional parameters, one of which is harmonic correction, but I either used it wrong or it didn't work. I'll try some different combos tonight and post the results. > And the other thing, is can you slow down a drum loop - supposedly > Izotope has transient features which might allow it hold good > transients even as it slows down. But tests would help demonstrate > that. That would be the easiest task of all, wouldn't it? Gregory
Message
Re: [Logic_Cafe] Serato vs. Izotope
2006-05-22 by Gregory Anderson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.