On 15/8/06 4:07 AM, leescott17 wrote: > In Pro Tools you would send the effected sound out a bus, set up a new track > with that bus > as it's input and record the effected sound. I really don't understand why you would want to record a wet signal. Imagine a couple weeks down the track, when you're mixing your project and you'll find the sound isn't sitting in the mix as well as you thought... With freeze tracks and the facility to bounce the wet track to disk it really makes no sense to do this. michael
Message
Re: recording with effects
2006-08-14 by Michael Scheurer