I think it's a good Idea, I have used your long brackets for mounting the Steiner and the Wave Multiplier boards, with little problem at all. But something that would be taller would be even better... Howard --- In motmpanels@yahoogroups.com, Larry Hendry <hendrysr@y...> wrote: > I have one of Ken Stones PCBs and know of others how have been > recently building these into their MOTM / Oakley format systems. I > find that my PCB is long and skinny compared to the Oakly / MOTM / > Blacet formats. > > In fact, on the Wave Multiplier PCB I have, the 6 inch length, is too > long running up and down for even my wide 4 pot bracket. > > So, anyhow here is my question.... > > I am thinking af making a new bracket. Todd has asked me to make > these available. It would be the same depth as my 3 pot and 4 pot > short brackets. However, the back 2 1/2 inches of the bracket would > be at least 6 inches tall. This would go behind any pots, switches, > or jacks on the front of the panels leaving almost 2 inches of space > for mounting stuff in front of the bracket. > > Since Ken is not consistent with PCB hole placement, there would be > no PCB mouting holes. But, the bracket PCB mouting space would be > large enough for any of his PCBs (the bigger ones that do not fit on > my normal brackets). And, they would of course conform to the normal > MOTM statdards. This would be a 3 pot bracket. > > Any interest in these brackets? > Larry Hendry > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo > http://search.yahoo.com
Message
Re: Any CGS bracket interest
2003-04-21 by Bob
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.