OK. Thanks to everyone that responded. It is good to see that Ken is adopting the 6" standard (see below). But, my existing brackets that are only 5 1/2 inches tall just don't quite fit the bill. And, I hear that some of you think jack mouting instead of pot mounting is a good idea. I have only one of Ken's PCBs (so far) so I am not totally tuned into what to expect for front panel arrangements that can be used for jack and/or pots to mount the brackets. So, please give me your ideas for a bracket design. Here is what I can tell you that are most certain: 1. Pot and or jack spacing will conform to MOTM specs. That is the whole concept behind the bracket form factor. 2. I can put PCB mounting holes (see Ken's note below) to accomodate 1, 2 and 3" wide PCBs, assuming the hole placement from the edges is consistent. Those mounting some of the older PCBs would have to drill their own holes if they did choose to use these brackets. 3. I am willing to use pot or jack mounting, or some comination there of which might be generic enough to work for all PCBs. So, please, those of you with more CGS experience than I (which is almost everyone), tell me what we need. I'll be happy to make something. I want to lean toward the new standard and not go any deeper than a standard MOTM bracket (~ 4 3/8"). The smaller PCBs will fit my 3 pot short bracket anyhow. Larry --- sasami@... wrote: > At least I am adopting some standards now :) I'm doing my boards > 6" tall, and 1, 2 or 3" wide. Some of the older boards will be > reworked to these standards too. Why 6" x 1" increments? Because > this is the standard used in Serge boards, and I have a lot of > Serge form-factor stuff here. > Ken __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo http://search.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [motmpanels] Re: Any CGS bracket interest
2003-04-21 by Larry Hendry
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.