Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 24 of 56 · 2770 messages matched
2008-04-10 by Luigi
Sergio what's up man?!?!?!? I've talked to you a few times! WELCOME! :) [Luigi LaValle-/www.virb.com/EPINASTY/] __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
2008-04-10 by gabu_004
hummmmm despise my negative vote, afterall they look cool so cancel my vote! ;) --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, amnesia wrote: > > cool with me > > > > > > >
2008-04-10 by amnesia
cool with me > >
2008-04-09 by (i think you can figure that out)
I'm pleased to announce that Sergio Trejo, ex of Analogue Haven, has joined the ranks of Plan B/EAR as of today. Please join me in giving Sergio a big Plan B welcome to the 'team'. -P
2008-04-09 by Anthony Rolando
Those look nice. They do not appear to be "Knurled." Are they? Tony > To: PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com > From: peter@buzzclick-music.com > Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 19:10:33 +0000 > Subject: [PLAN_B_analog_blog] Picture of jacks > > They look a lot like this. Really really real
2008-04-09 by (i think you can figure that out)
They look a lot like this. Really really really really really close (if you get my drift): http://www.doepfer.de/A100_AD_DA_prototype
2008-04-09 by Brad Hawkins
Peter, this is good news! i hate the flakey Cliffs! bring em on!
2008-04-09 by loopcycle
I'm totally down for a more reliable jack. Are these the same nuts that Wiard and Metalbox use (the ones that require that cylindrical-with-two-prongs nutdriver thingy)? --- "(i think you can figure that out)" wrote: > Excuse me? > > Guys - > > I have found a replacement jack for
2008-04-09 by junglephone
Hello All, I apologize in advance if I misuse any terminology or am missing any elementary concepts. My question is this: I notice that when I use the model 12 in Low Pass mode (LP out), and the frequency cutoff is all the way open (whether saw or pulse is fed through), the sound
2008-04-09 by David Salter
How about a photo Peter? David Salter Senior Consultant PSG Reuters Messaging: david.salter.reuters.com@reuters.net (t) +44 (0)20 7542 2402 | (m) 07990562402 | (f) 52699 Get the latest news at Reuters.com -----Original Message----- From: PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com [mailto
2008-04-09 by Anthony Rolando
Is there a pic of the new nuts anywhere? Are they similar to those used by Wiard on the FRAC modules he does? Tony > To: PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com > From: peter@buzzclick-music.com > Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 14:08:53 +0000 > Subject: [PLAN_B_analog_blog] Question for my pee
2008-04-09 by (i think you can figure that out)
Excuse me? Guys - I have found a replacement jack for Cliff which looks/acts the same as far as the user experience, sans the annoying intermittentcy associated with Cliff jacks. Saints be praised. We already have a few thousand of these jacks in stock. A matter of fact, most of
2008-04-09 by PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the PLAN_B_analog_blog group: ROUND NUTS Would you mind the use of round nuts on our i/o jacks? o yes, I'd hate round jacks o no, it's fine. Bring on the new modules! To vote, please visit the following web page: http://group
2008-04-09 by untiedstates
for me the best part is the range, and without a switch! count me in. i'd love to see a polyphonic envelope/serge vcs with that kind of frequency range. for audio and cv. --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "(i think you can figure that out)" wrote: > > Because it's coming
2008-04-08 by Luigi
I just want to introduce myself to the list... hola everyone, Luigi Here!! Just wanted to say that... I'm 27 and unfortunately never got to buy that old moog or old harp etc... as I was growing into my lust for synths.... HOWEVER!!! I don't have to give 2 shits about that theory
2008-04-08 by ispeakhopelandic
probably not the best idea. it's got pretty wide range. pwm is fun but i can live w/o it in square/pulse of my LFO. :) --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, Brad Hawkins wrote: > > > > > > > 8) It will not have PWM > > > > is there a fat elf in the works? > > orr..... i supp
2008-04-08 by Eyesaw
That'll work, Nicely Done - Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: (i think you can figure that out) To: PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 10:22 AM Subject: [PLAN_B_analog_blog] Re: Plan B ELF LFO Yes, it has an attenuator for the Freq VC. All the
2008-04-08 by Tim J
Thats pretty damn cool. If its at a reasonable price (like all PlanB stuff) count me in for a couple. And...I want a model 16!!!! Tim To: PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com From: peter@buzzclick-music.com Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:59:05 +0000 Subject: [PLAN_B_analog_blog] Plan B E
2008-04-08 by Eyesaw
Excellent - instead of (2) A147 deploy (4) PB LFO? If it works out reasonably as powerful as a 147 this sounds good. Now, will the VC input have an attenuator? No big whoop either way. Challenging to consider given it's high frequency potential - Ver interesting, Bill ----- Origi
2008-04-08 by Brad Hawkins
> > > 8) It will not have PWM > is there a fat elf in the works? orr..... i suppose we can mod our M15s
2008-04-08 by (i think you can figure that out)
TIM! Good the hear from you, buddy! Don't be a stranger, your comments are always welcomed here. - P --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, Tim J wrote: > > > Thats pretty damn cool. If its at a reasonable price (like all PlanB stuff) count me in for a couple. > > And...I wan
2008-04-08 by Anthony Rolando
I have a feeling one of the 2 LFO will be uC based. Tony > To: PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com > From: monkeyfinger@mac.com > Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 18:58:43 -0600 > Subject: Re: [PLAN_B_analog_blog] Re: PLAN B SYNTHESIZERS MOVES TO NEW HOME AND NEW US DEALER > > whatever it is
2008-04-08 by (i think you can figure that out)
Yes, it has an attenuator for the Freq VC. All the way CW equals 1v/oct. There's a trim pot on board to adjust that to make sure it happens in everyone's system. --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "Eyesaw" wrote: > > Excellent - instead of (2) A147 deploy (4) PB LFO? If i
2008-04-08 by (i think you can figure that out)
Because it's coming up and you'll all see a picture of it soon, I will give some details of our LFO which address questions which have arisen on this list over the last couple of days: 1) It's an ELF module (only 4hp wide) 2) It will have multiple waveform outputs 3) It will have
2008-04-08 by (i think you can figure that out)
In the next week we will be publishing more information on the new Models 21C, 30, 30A, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 38A, 39 and 40. Short functional descriptions and photos. Then at least you'll know what I've been up to over the last seven months! More when I'm able, - P
2008-04-08 by Eyesaw
Peter: This is very good news. Looking forward to its release - Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: (i think you can figure that out) To: PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 11:06 PM Subject: [PLAN_B_analog_blog] Mlton (was: Model 18) In regards to
2008-04-08 by tomas everaert
> There will be two Milton's initially. 4 x 16 Venti and another small > one the Model 21C you guys know nothing about yet._ Hmm. Perhaps the C of Circle? (just guessing ;-)
2008-04-08 by (i think you can figure that out)
Jari, the M25 is about 3 inches deep, possibly a little less than that. The ring is AC coupled. This particular circuit did not yield a lot of difference between the two modes, but it was so damn quiet in carrier suppression I didn't want to mess with it just to add a feature eve
2008-04-08 by (i think you can figure that out)
In regards to this comment: > --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "Eyesaw" wrote: > ...Same goes for the Milton. Although, at least I know why that has not > been released. Perhaps others are aware of the issues with this > device... ????? I want to clear this up before ru
2008-04-07 by modularplanner
Update to planners: Planner now has the following features -- Automatic Save/Load of Layout via Flash Shared Object (cookies) stored on your system. -- All modules graphics now have either their graphic or a labels blank panel, so all are usable now. A lot more pictures now. -- C
2008-04-07 by jalmari3
How deep is it? --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "jalmari3" wrote: > > Not much has been said about M25. Is it good? > > Are noise and waveshaping available at the same time? > "WIth no input present in the Attenuator/Waveshaper, the output of the > returns a manually-a
2008-04-06 by jalmari3
--- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "Eyesaw" wrote: ...Same goes for the Milton. Although, at least I know why that has not been released. Perhaps others are aware of the issues with this device... What kind of issues? It was mentioned, that putting all the controls into t
2008-04-06 by Brad Hawkins
whatever it is it better have PWM!!! On 5-Apr-08, at 3:01 PM, Ryan Dean wrote: > > Note how he says "LFOs" plural. > > So, it's a dual then? > > Hope they have a reset. >
2008-04-05 by Eyesaw
Peter - I can understand an LFO being prioritized. I see absolutely no flaws in the 18 design and await it's release - Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: (i think you can figure that out) To: PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 1:17 PM Subject:
2008-04-05 by p. hendricks
On 4/5/08 11:17 AM, "(i think you can figure that out)" wrote: > yeah, better. > > remember, ours have four VC level and VC pan pots with the headphone > pre and the level meter. so it's more than just a mixer. cool! didn't mean to imply Peter couldn't make a better sounding mixe
2008-04-05 by Ryan Dean
Note how he says "LFOs" plural. So, it's a dual then? Hope they have a reset. Can't wait to see what you come up with. On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 11:17 AM, (i think you can figure that out) peter@buzzclick-music.com > wrote: yeah, better. remember, ours have four VC level and VC pan
2008-04-05 by gabu_004
Moog audio... canada? hehehe my M25 and M10 will be there soon then ;) g. --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "(i think you can figure that out)" wrote: > > All, > > First, I apologize for not getting to the list management this week. > As warned we were going dark for the
2008-04-05 by Brad Hawkins
> > >> I think many people are using Mackie 1204 or Behringer equiv. > >> > > > > > > which is just totally insane! > but is something even from Peter's crafty hand gonna much sound > better? Peter? i hope so. i can't imagine it being too hard to surpass a behringer/mackie
2008-04-05 by (i think you can figure that out)
yeah, better. remember, ours have four VC level and VC pan pots with the headphone pre and the level meter. so it's more than just a mixer. For the record, I am not putting the Model 18 at the end of the rope becaue there's no demand for it. I'm doing it because we have other fun
2008-04-05 by (i think you can figure that out)
All, First, I apologize for not getting to the list management this week. As warned we were going dark for the move, but I have some time now that it's the weekend to get to everything. I've uploaded some photos of our new facility in the loft of the Noisebug complex. Look for th
2008-04-04 by jalmari3
OK. I found the photo. There are actually four knobs in the top section.
2008-04-04 by jalmari3
Not much has been said about M25. Is it good? Are noise and waveshaping available at the same time? "WIth no input present in the Attenuator/Waveshaper, the output of the returns a manually-adjustable analog White Noise source. When the Mode switch is thrown to left , the White N
2008-04-03 by p. hendricks
On 4/1/08 10:38 PM, "Brad Hawkins" wrote: >> >> >> I think many people are using Mackie 1204 or Behringer equiv. >> > > > which is just totally insane! but is something even from Peter's crafty hand gonna much sound better? I think this is more of a function case, I don't know, I
2008-04-03 by othersidesounds2003
curious, I found the vector rails for mounting, and I understand I have to get a condor PS thats better than the doepfers...any idea which one though? and also can I just use the doepfer power rails? or should I get a bunch of model 1s? or is there another alternative? thanks
2008-04-02 by joshualiburdi
I wonder how many of the M10 mk2s they got... I got one. --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "deastman2" wrote: > > Peter, any idea when additional Model 10 mk2's will be available? > I've been trying to buy an M10 since last year. When the new mk2 > showed up on Analogue
2008-04-02 by Eyesaw
Peter: I am not interested in (8) channels; if you want to talk of a nearly no demand product, there you have it. I just want the Model 18 which was supposed to be available , like 2 years ago. It is very frustrating when these designs are proposed with statements like "available
2008-04-02 by Brad Hawkins
> > > I think many people are using Mackie 1204 or Behringer equiv. > which is just totally insane! why spend all that money on an amazing sounding synth(s) then run it/them through such ugly garbage? i know, it's a sad market place in the 'small mixer' dept, but... ugh rack up o
2008-04-02 by deastman2
Peter, any idea when additional Model 10 mk2's will be available? I've been trying to buy an M10 since last year. When the new mk2 showed up on Analogue Haven, I ordered one immediately. A few days later, they contacted me to let me know they had run out of them and had to refund
2008-04-02 by (i think you can figure that out)
It's coming....there are just other things that need to come first. When you guys see what the modules are that were listed this morning in the annoncement it'll make a whole lot more sense. It's a big picture scenario. In regards to the 8 channel expander however....not sure thi
2008-04-02 by Dan Levey
Until the 18 is out, Cwejman has the only Stereo 4 Channel Eurorack Mixer, the MX-4S. Has attenuation for everything but expensive. --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "Eyesaw" wrote: > > Tony: > > OK, so that explains the 18's delay fairly well. It is apparent from curren