Doug, I'm no expert but I think it does matter and that there is more image information left in an RGB image than a Gray Scale. That's how it was explained to me in a community college Photoshop class and that how I've been doing it, with great results. Alan On Feb 5, 2006, at 10:41 AM, Doug Walker wrote: > Thanks Alan. > > I guess my pondering came upon seeing in Uwe Steinmueller review of > Roy Harrington's QuadTone RIP where the steps which included a > Greyscale image in Print with Preview with a source Grayscale 2.2, > not an RGB. > > So it does not matter? RGB or Grayscale? Is one better than tother? > > Doug Walker, FP > "Specializing in Corporate People in their Workplaces in a Clean, > Bold Classic Style!" > website: http://www.walkerphoto.com > Phone (360) 943-1293 > Olympia, WA > member- American Society of Media Photographers, Inc. (ASMP) > member-Professional Photographers of Washington (PPW) > > > On Feb 5, 2006, at 9:51 AM, Alan Kearney wrote: > > > I print RGB's straight to my Epson 4000 with QuadtoneRIP and they > > look great! > > > > Alan > > > > SPONSORED LINKS > Digital wedding photography Learn digital photography Digital > photography college > Digital photography Digital photography web site Digital > photography course > > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > Visit your group "QuadtoneRIP" on the web. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > QuadtoneRIP-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. > >
Message
Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Convert to Grayscale vs Channel Mixer
2006-02-06 by Alan Kearney
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.