OK. Thanks. All of the files are currently in a grey gamma 2.2. I assume the process to go throught is to 'convert to profile' to the QTR grey lab and then when printing to use the qtr grey matte a the print space ( with black point compression ? ). That has produced better but not perfect results. Maybe I just need to bite the bullet and buy an eye one and make icc profiles. I have one question about the eye-one products. I assume that all I need to make the B&W icc profiles is the measuring device. Is this true or do I need to purchase one of the Eye-One packages ( design, photo, proof etc )? -- On 14-May-06, at 11:55 AM, wjlafever wrote: > Kevin > > If you haven't tried the QTR Gray Lab working space, you might try > that. I get a great print to screen match using it as my work/print > space on a 2200. > > Will > > --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, KevinG <keving@...> wrote: >> >> I've just installed the K7 inks in my 2200. I'm running a few test >> prints and I'm generally pleased but they seem flat. I hadn't >> noticed this with the UC inks where the match to the calibrated >> screen was generally very good. >> >> It is, however a new flat panel ( apple cinema ) screen and I may not >> have looked that closely at the other prints before installing the K7 >> inks. >> >> Has anyone else noticed this? > > > > > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -------------------- > ~--> > Get to your groups with one click. Know instantly when new email > arrives > http://us.click.yahoo.com/.7bhrC/MGxNAA/yQLSAA/ucIolB/TM > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > ~-> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
Message
Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: K7s a little flat
2006-05-15 by KevinG
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.