Yahoo Groups archive

QTR-Quadtone RIP

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:12 UTC

Thread

Help with Single Gray QTR Profile

Help with Single Gray QTR Profile

2017-02-22 by greg@...

Hi Everyone,


Trying to figure out the process of making a digital negative with QTR

I am looking at what was written in the past by Sandy and Mike about using a single gray system. I am using a Epson 7880 on a Mac and printing mostly Palladium prints. I am using florescent BLB bulbs in a UV box. I am using Fixxons and Hahnemuhle Platinum Rag. I am using 18 drops FO + 18 drops PD 2 drops Tween 20 and 1 drop Na2 2.5% I keep the paper overnight in a humidity chamber at 45% humidity at around 70-74 degrees. I coat it and let is set for 4-5 minutes. I don’t dry it with any fan after.

Step 1: I used a 31 step Tablet from Mark Nelson and figured that my max print time for blacks. 7 minutes gave me blacks merged from step 1-3. I made my printing time 4 minutes.

Step 2: I printed the inktone separation test in Quadtone RIP Calibration mode (per Clays instructions) I found the K ink becomes pure white at 80%. I compared the LK strip to the K strip and found that 85% LK = 50%K. Yellow is 80% pure white and the LLK 100% LLK = 25%K. Again following what Clay wrote a while back

Where I get confused now is that if I look at what Sandy and John wrote in the newly released and wonderful Carbon book, I don’t see how you get the limits of the inks. If I go by Clays method, I get:

DEFAULT_INK_LIMIT=100

BOOST_K=0

LIMIT_K=80

LIMIT_C=1

LIMIT_M=1

LIMIT_Y=12

LIMIT_LC=1

LIMIT_LM=1

LIMIT_LK=85

LIMIT_LLK=100

N_OF_GRAY_PARTS=3

GRAY_INK_1=K

GRAY_VAL_1=100

GRAY_INK_2=LK

GRAY_VAL_2=50

GRAY_INK_3=LLK

GRAY_VAL_3=20

When I look at Sandy’s I see

DEFAULT_INK_LIMIT=55

LIMIT_K=25

LIMIT_C=25

LIMIT_M=1

LIMIT_Y=25

LIMIT_LC=1

LIMIT_LM=1

LIMIT_LK=40

LIMIT_LLK=1

How do you get those values from the inktone separation test? Do you enter the info for density or is that replaced with the DEFAULT_INK_LIMIT=55

I tried printing out the profile like this:

GRAPH_CURVE=YES

N_OF_INKS=8

DEFAULT_INK_LIMIT=55

LIMIT_K=25

LIMIT_C=25

LIMIT_M=1

LIMIT_Y=25

LIMIT_LC=1

LIMIT_LM=1

LIMIT_LK=40

LIMIT_LLK=1

GRAY_HIGHLIGHT=4

GRAY_SHADOW=4

GRAY_GAMMA= 0.7

CURVE_K= "0;0 100;100"

COPY_CURVE_C=K

COPY_CURVE_M=K

COPY_CURVE_Y=K

COPY_CURVE_LC=K

COPY_CURVE_LM=K

COPY_CURVE_LK=K

COPY_CURVE_LLK=K

It installed but I got an error about the curve. When I printed it, the ink was dripping off the negative.

The other problem I had was when I tried to go to the next step of building the curve. I tried the Build QTR Curve.jsx with Photoshop CC 2017 and I got an error about a command no longer valid and the action stopped. I also have a Spider 4 spectrometer and was able to do it that way using the B&W mastery excel sheet.

I know, lots of questions, but I have done about 30 prints already trying to get this process down.

Thanks,

Greg


Re: Help with Single Gray QTR Profile

2017-02-22 by sanking@...

Greg,

Please look at the Files section of this forum. There, in the folder Docs, you will find a folder called QTR Files for Digital Negatives where I talk about two different methods of profiling that I use, one for an all gray ink set, the other for a single gray value system where I use the Epson OEM inks. I call that Carbon 100 because it is very easy and simple to explain to students. Like English 101 or French 101 in college!!

Basically, I only use three of the 8 inks in an Epson K3 ink set (PK, Y and LLK) because these are the only ones that block UV light. All of the others I set to defalt level of 1 so that the printer uses some of the ink to inks to keep the nozzles happy. The default level of the PK, Y and LLK is set relative to each other based on the UV blocking power of each. PK and Y are approximately equal so I set them at the same value, LLK needs about 2X the percentage of PK and Y to lay down the same UV blocking, so I set the default ink level to twice the percentage. In the Carbon 100 profile in the Files section I have these values set to PK=25, Y=25 and LLK=50, and in that profile you get UV blocking that gives a density range of about log 2.05 on OHP. If that DR turns out to be too high for your process you decrease the number of these three inks proportionally, say -10%, or -20%, etc. If these limits give a negative with a density range too low for your process you increase the number of these three inks by proportionally, for example by +10% or +20%.

Basically, you adjust the ink percentage of the PK, Y and LLK until you can print a step wedge negative (ising your standard printing time) that has a full range of tones from DMax to DMin. Then you can linearize the profile, your method with the Spyder 4 and Richard's spread sheet is a good way, or you can also just enter the log density numbers in the LINEARIZE command, as I do in the sample Carbon 100 profile in the Files section.

Sandy

Re: Help with Single Gray QTR Profile

2017-02-22 by greg@...

Thanks Sandy. I did start off with that and made some modification based on another post or somewhere you wrote about changing it for platinum. I just went back and looked at it and I think the mistake I made was having the C=25. I was wondering how did you arrive at 25 for the limit?

The other question I had was when using I1 or Spyder, do you calibrate it using the white of the paper or the cradle?

Thanks again for all the help!!

Greg

Re: Help with Single Gray QTR Profile

2017-02-22 by sanking@...

Greg,

The first test I made for the single gray value system was to print an inkjet separation 8 file in QTR calibration mode to determine the relative UV blocking of each of the inks in the K3 ink set. Initially I determined the relative values by measuring the densities with a UV transmission densitometer, and with that instrument the cyan in the K3 set measures high in UV blocking, about the same as the PK and Y, so I set all three to 25%. Later when I tested the calibration page with several alternative processes I found that the C is really a very low UV blocker, no better than the M, so I now treat it that way and set the ink limit to 1.

My view is that one should zero out readings to paper white. Not doing so will alter the grade/slope of the curve, which in turn would change the density at 50% where the correction is adjusted to linear. The difference cold be very small and have no practical impact on results, or it might be quite large.

Sandy

Re: Help with Single Gray QTR Profile

2017-02-23 by greg@...

Thanks Sandy. I tried it last night and created a profile based off the readings. I didn't get any tone until about step 15-20 and the first difference in the dark tones came in around 80 which I believe is normal for a profile with no curve or linearization. I had to change the first reading from 27 to 26, otherwise I could not linearize it. This is the profile I made:

#PRINTER=Quad7880
#CURVE_NAME=
GRAPH_CURVE=YES
N_OF_INKS=8
DEFAULT_INK_LIMIT=100
LIMIT_K=25
LIMIT_C=1
LIMIT_M=1
LIMIT_Y=25
LIMIT_LC=1
LIMIT_LM=1
LIMIT_LK=40
LIMIT_LLK=1

GRAY_HIGHLIGHT=4
GRAY_SHADOW=4
GRAY_GAMMA= 0.07

CURVE_K= "0;0 100;100"
COPY_CURVE_C=K
COPY_CURVE_M=K
COPY_CURVE_Y=K
COPY_CURVE_LC=K
COPY_CURVE_LM=K
COPY_CURVE_LK=K
COPY_CURVE_LLK=K

LINEARIZE="26.51 27.75 28.35 29.36 31.19 34.46 39.77 46.52 53.67 60.64 66.73 73.13 77.22 80.34 82.43 84.17 85.07 85.61 86.27 86.79 87.16"


I will print it tonight and see how it works.

Thanks again,

Greg

Re: Help with Single Gray QTR Profile

2017-02-23 by sanking@...

Hi Greg,

I inserted your LINEARIZE numbers into a profile and installed it. What it shows is that you have a long straight curve, but with a very abrupt toe and shoulder. The linearize will probably correct enough to make a print, but I would suggest that before you try to do so you should work on your process in printing the step wedge to make it more linear in the toe and in the shoulder.

To correct, basically what you need to do is increase density in the very low shadow areas of the negative (increase exposure time by about 10%-20%) and increase density in the highlights (increase the default level of the PK, Y and LLK by about +5% to +10%) to give you a negative with a higher density range. Then print the step wedge again with no curve.

BTW, in a profile of this type where all curves follow the K the gray highlight, gray shadow and gray gamma have no impact on the slop, but you must have something in there for the profile to install. If you have nothing, the program will place these numbers, so I just include them myself.

GRAY_HIGHLIGHT=4
GRAY_SHADOW=4
GRAY_GAMMA= 1

I am attaching another profile that was linearized with a spectro to give you some idea of the kind of differentiation you need to see in the LINEARIZE numbers for a decent profile. The lower the number the closer you are to paper white, the higher the number the higher the reflection density range, and ideally there should be a fairly even differentiation between all of the values.

Sandy

#PRINTER=Quad4880

#CURVE_NAME= Carbon100 #Based on Carbon Tissue #238, 7 grams/liter of Cal Tint II Lampblack with tissue coated to a wet height of 0.9mm.
#Profile when printing a step wedge gives a DR (density range) of approximately log 2.25.
#With Tissue #238 sensitize with a 2% potassium dichromate solution, diluted 1+1 with acetone, approximately 10 ml per 8X10 sheet, applied in two coatings with a roller. 750 ULF units.

GRAPH_CURVE=YES
N_OF_INKS=8
DEFAULT_INK_LIMIT=100
LIMIT_K=26
LIMIT_C=1
LIMIT_M=1
LIMIT_Y=31
LIMIT_LC=1
LIMIT_LM=1
LIMIT_LK=44
LIMIT_LLK=1

GRAY_HIGHLIGHT=4
GRAY_SHADOW=4
GRAY_GAMMA= 1

CURVE_K= "0;0 100;100"
COPY_CURVE_C=K
COPY_CURVE_M=K
COPY_CURVE_Y=K
COPY_CURVE_LC=K
COPY_CURVE_LM=K
COPY_CURVE_LK=K
COPY_CURVE_LLK=K

LINEARIZE="18.17 19.66 21.26 23.06 25.42 28.09 30.8 33.51 36.66 39.83 43.05 46.73 50.84 54.32 58.67 63.18 68.3 75.2 84.72 90.98 93.35"

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.