Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Digest Number 256
2005-12-24 by Jack Winberg
Jack: I (we) await your comparative profile results with baited breath!!!!!! Jack Winberg (We are a pair of Jacks) At 11:51 AM 12/24/2005, you wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>From: Jack Fulton <jefulton1@...> >Subject: Is the Eye-One necessary? > >We, at the San Francisco Art Institute, are also beta testing the >Printfix PRO >and comparing to using an X-Rite DPT-41 with ColorVision's Profiler >Pro and >other instruments. We will have comparative profiles in a few weeks >and I'll try >to remember to post our thoughts. >Jack Fulton > > > >On Dec 23, 2005, at 8:26 AM, QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com wrote: > > > Message: 2 > > Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 15:34:27 -0500 > > From: Jack Winberg <jack.winberg@...> > > Subject: Is the Eye-one Necessary? > > > > Hi JH: > > > > I am currently involved in the end stages of beta testing the > > Colorvision Printfix PRO, and am pleased to report that it looks like > > a solid package, yielding high quality ICC print profiles. The > > spectrocolorimeter utilized is a very good design. I have not > > directly compared it to an Eye-one, and would be delighted if > > somebody did just that. It is scheduled for release in January. My > > review of it will be on Steve's Digicams, and possibly Reichman's > > Luminous Landscape. > > > > Jack Winberg