Thanks for the feedback. Your point concerning toning is a good one>
--- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Ridings <dlr@...> wrote:
>
> bcadigan wrote:
>
> > I am thinking of getting a set of Piezography inks for B&W
printing on
> > my Epson 1800. Has anyone had any experience with these inks on
that
> > printer? Specifically, did they improve your prints noticeably?
Is it
> > as easy as they claim to move back and forth between the
Piezography
> > cartridges for B&W and the Epson cartridges for clor printing? So
far
> > Quadtone is giving me pretty good results in B&W with the regular
set
> > of Epson inks.
>
> I have experience with both with the R800 and I think we're talking
> about the same situation, except that the R800 only goes up to
A4/Letter
> size.
>
> First I tried QTR with the Epson inks. But I had usually used the
MIS
> Ultratone inks for b/w so I wanted to try carbon inks in the R800.
>
> I ordered the Piezsography inks for b&w printing and printed out a
few.
>
> The Piezography is just fine, nice prints, nothing wrong with them
at
> all. But the original Epson inks and QTR can produce the same
results in
> addition to giving you the flexibility of toning (cold, neutral,
warm
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> and percentages of various combinations).
>
> So ... I'll probably stick to the Epson inks.
>
> Daniel Ridings
> http://dlridings.se/paw/2006
>